TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS
1Spfyta
1Spfyta
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
years. Of the three intercountry adoptions in FY 2013/14, all were girls. Among them, one was<br />
adopted in India and Norway each, and another was in USA. In the FY 2014/15, there were only 2<br />
intercountry adoptions – both were girls. One was adopted in USA and another in Slovakia. Although<br />
the number of intercountry adoptions has declined in the recent years, the number of surrogacy has<br />
rapidly been increasing in Nepal.<br />
Table 2.15 Number of children in intercountry adoption from FY 2009/10 -2014/15<br />
FY Boys Girls Total<br />
Before 1993<br />
NA<br />
May 1993 –August 2008 NA NA 2,234<br />
2009/10 18 32 50<br />
2010/11 18 34 52<br />
2011/12 6 18 24<br />
2012/13 2 5 7<br />
2013/14 0 3 3<br />
2014/15 0 2 2<br />
Source: CCWB 2010, and CCWB 2014 and CCWB 2015. Note NA refers to ‘not availability’.<br />
Much research, however, is needed to understand the potential nexus of trafficking in relation to<br />
inter-country adoptions, in relation to both inter and intra country adoptions. It has also time to<br />
assess the implementation status of Terms and Conditions 2008 and the role of the Management<br />
Committee of MoWCSW to regulate the intercountry adoption.<br />
2.6.5 Vulnerability of Trafficking: Missing Children and Women<br />
Missing children is often not taken as the trafficking of children. However, studies indicate that there<br />
is close relation between missing children phenomenon and trafficking of children (NHRC-OSRT,<br />
2011). Realizing the linkage between the phenomena of missing children and trafficking, the<br />
Supreme Court of India ordered to the Union of India and States in May 10, 2013 that if the missing<br />
children are not found within four months of the first information report (FIR), the matter shall be<br />
forwarded to the Anti-Trafficking Unit and take up more intensive investigation regarding the<br />
missing child as human trafficking (Box 2.2).<br />
Box 2.2 Supreme Court of India: Decision on Missing Children<br />
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 75 of 2012<br />
Bachpan Bacho Andolan Petitioner (s) versus Union of India and ORS – Respondent (s)<br />
In the said Office Memorandum, a missing child has been defined as, “a person below eighteen<br />
years of age, whose whereabouts are not known to the parents, legal guardians and any other<br />
person, who may be legally entrusted with the custody of the child, whatever may be the<br />
circumstances/causes of disappearance. The child will be considered missing and in need of care<br />
and protection within the meaning of the later part of the Juvenile Act, until located and/or<br />
his/her safety/well being is established.”<br />
In case a missing child is not recovered within four months from the date of filing of the FIR, the<br />
matter may be forwarded to the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit in each State in order to enable<br />
the said Unit to take up more intensive investigation regarding the missing child. The Anti-<br />
Human Trafficking Unit shall file periodical status reports after every three months to keep the<br />
Legal Services Authorities updated.<br />
Once a child is recovered, the police authorities shall carry out further investigation to see<br />
whether there is an involvement of any trafficking in the procedure by which the child went<br />
missing and if, on investigation, such links are found, the police shall take appropriate action<br />
thereupon.<br />
26