04.06.2016 Views

Arendt und Zannini - 2013 - Cereal grains for the food and beverage industries

Arendt und Zannini - 2013 - Cereal grains for the food and beverage industries

Arendt und Zannini - 2013 - Cereal grains for the food and beverage industries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

136 <strong>Cereal</strong> <strong>grains</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>beverage</strong> <strong>industries</strong><br />

which are <strong>the</strong>n lifted from <strong>the</strong> grain mass <strong>and</strong> discharged by gravity when<br />

<strong>the</strong> indent cannot hold <strong>the</strong> grain any longer (Wimberly, 1983; Bond, 2004).<br />

Milling<br />

Three methods, namely wet, dry <strong>and</strong> semi-dry milling, have been used to<br />

grind polished rice kernels or brokens into flour (Chiang <strong>and</strong> Yeh, 2002).<br />

Wet grinding is a traditional process used to prepare rice flour <strong>and</strong> includes<br />

five successive steps: soaking, adding excess water during grinding, filtering,<br />

drying <strong>and</strong> sieving. This process comprises <strong>the</strong> use of several machines <strong>and</strong><br />

much manpower. Additionally, this process is known to have significant<br />

flour loss <strong>and</strong> high energy consumption (Yeh, 2004). Dry grinding does<br />

not use water (no waste water generation) <strong>and</strong> is characterized by its<br />

limited consumption of energy. Herein, <strong>the</strong> rice kernel is gro<strong>und</strong> with dry<br />

grinding machinery such as a hammer mill, pin mill, roller mill or disc mill,<br />

etc. Never<strong>the</strong>less, many <strong>food</strong> items made of dry gro<strong>und</strong> flour (<strong>for</strong> instance,<br />

noodles) have inadequate rheological properties <strong>for</strong> many consumer uses<br />

(Yeh, 2004).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> semi-dry grinding methods, <strong>the</strong> properties of flour are intermediate<br />

to those of both dry <strong>and</strong> wet gro<strong>und</strong> flour from <strong>the</strong> perspectives<br />

of particle size, viscosity, damaged starch, etc. (Ngamnikom <strong>and</strong><br />

Songsermpong, 2011). The semi-dry grinding process is characterized by<br />

three consecutive steps: soaking, drying to remove excess water (15-17 %<br />

wet basis) <strong>and</strong> grinding with dry grinding machinery (Yeh, 2004). Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />

<strong>the</strong> semi-dry method has some disadvantages, such as <strong>the</strong> longer time<br />

required to adjust <strong>the</strong> rice kernel moisture content, <strong>the</strong> high energy consumption<br />

needed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> drying step, <strong>the</strong> excessive consumption of water<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> generation of waste water. Generally, wet-milled flour is superior<br />

to dry-milled flour <strong>for</strong> making traditional baked products (Bean et ai, 1983)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Thai rice-based snack <strong>food</strong> (Jomduang <strong>and</strong> Mohamed, 1994). The superior<br />

quality of wet-milled flour is mainly due to its low proportion of<br />

damaged starch <strong>and</strong> finest relative particle size (Chen et al., 1999).<br />

Ngamnikom <strong>and</strong> Songsermpong (2011) investigated <strong>the</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance of<br />

a new grinding process, which includes freezing rice with liquid nitrogen<br />

prior to dry grinding. In terms of damaged starch content, average particle<br />

size, particle size distribution, microscopic structures <strong>and</strong> energy consumption,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y fo<strong>und</strong> that <strong>the</strong> freeze grinding resulted in (i) reduced particle size<br />

<strong>and</strong> damaged starch content due to <strong>the</strong> extremely low temperature of <strong>the</strong><br />

sample prior to grinding, <strong>and</strong> (ii) a smaller flour particle size than from dry<br />

grinding resulting in a greater yield after sieving. Moreover, freeze grinding<br />

produced a higher flour yield after sieving in comparison with dry grinding<br />

using an identical grinder. Finally, <strong>the</strong> energy consumption of freeze grinding<br />

was similar to dry grinding <strong>and</strong> much lower than that detected <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

wet grinding process. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> authors conclude that <strong>the</strong> freeze<br />

grinding process was a viable alternative to <strong>the</strong> traditional wet grinding

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!