21.07.2016 Views

PENALTY

DBk0302s7Xm

DBk0302s7Xm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the wider political community of their country. I am honoured that<br />

all Italian political actors and institutions have shown full and unwavering<br />

support for the campaign. This level of support is particularly<br />

important in countries where capital punishment still exists. In these<br />

circumstances, political leaders are called to engage constructively with<br />

parliaments to facilitate the legal reforms required, so that changes to<br />

establish a de jure moratorium or abolition can be enacted according<br />

to a sustainable reform path and within an appropriate time frame.<br />

Political leaders also play an important role in mobilising public opinion<br />

in favour of the abolition of the death penalty, for instance through<br />

awareness campaigns, public debates and specific educational programs<br />

in schools. I am deeply touched by the experiences of those political<br />

leaders that have directly witnessed the effects of the use of the death<br />

penalty and are actively engaged in the campaign for the moratorium.<br />

Such strong leadership is even more necessary when countries confront<br />

significant threats to their security, including organized crime and<br />

terrorism. Although there is increasing evidence that the death penalty<br />

is not an effective deterrent to crime, statistics are not always enough<br />

to sway public opinion. The sense of insecurity caused by extremism<br />

and widespread violence may lead people to believe that the death<br />

penalty could restore security. It is exactly in such cases, however, that<br />

political leaders are called to play a guiding role and make the case<br />

for the abolition of the death penalty, even if it may seem difficult to<br />

justify. Political responsibility to stop crime and violence does not need<br />

to lead to compromises in terms of human rights. On the contrary, it<br />

makes the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental<br />

freedoms even more necessary. For instance, enhanced efforts could be<br />

made to ensure that terrorists and those responsible for violations of<br />

international humanitarian or human rights law are held to account<br />

through existing international criminal justice mechanisms.<br />

The success of the campaign for a moratorium does not depend<br />

only on the contribution of political leadership. All international and<br />

national institutions and all sectors of civil society should play a leading<br />

role. It is crucial, for example, to enhance cooperation between<br />

political institutions and nongovernmental organizations that possess<br />

specific expertise on the subject. In this regard, I would like to recall<br />

Italy’s experience as a useful example of positive synergy between<br />

national governments and civil society organisations. The Italian<br />

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation has established<br />

a special partnership with Comunità di Sant’Egidio, Hands<br />

off Cain and the Italian branch of Amnesty International. These<br />

organisations have been engaged for a long time in awareness-raising<br />

projects. Their global outreach has significantly contributed to<br />

the success of the campaign for a moratorium on the death penalty.<br />

Their efforts have effectively complemented activities undertaken at<br />

the institutional level.<br />

In many countries, religious leaders can also play a role in the campaign<br />

for the moratorium, in particular where religion and politics<br />

are closely intertwined, or for instance the judicial power is held by a<br />

religious authority. In some cases such a positive interaction could be<br />

more complex, but constructive dialogue is always the best tool for<br />

promoting human rights, even in the most difficult contexts.<br />

Other examples of successful outreach include initiatives carried out<br />

together with the academic or judiciary community of countries<br />

where capital punishment is still practised. Although in such countries<br />

the abolition of the death penalty may not be possible in the short<br />

term, dialogue between human rights experts and legal practitioners<br />

could produce significant results and pave the way for future changes.<br />

In this regard, the support of the United Nations, mainly through the<br />

activities of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights,<br />

can provide invaluable help.<br />

In conclusion, the conditions of individual countries may differ, but<br />

the campaign for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty with<br />

a view to its eventual full abolition will only be successful if it can<br />

count on strong leadership at all levels. Successful political leaders<br />

are able to overcome setbacks and difficulties by reaching out to all<br />

interested parties at the institutional level and within civil society.<br />

This continuous dialogue is instrumental to building the consensus<br />

we need to steadily progress towards a world where justice does not<br />

require the loss of a human life.<br />

280 281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!