PENALTY
DBk0302s7Xm
DBk0302s7Xm
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the wider political community of their country. I am honoured that<br />
all Italian political actors and institutions have shown full and unwavering<br />
support for the campaign. This level of support is particularly<br />
important in countries where capital punishment still exists. In these<br />
circumstances, political leaders are called to engage constructively with<br />
parliaments to facilitate the legal reforms required, so that changes to<br />
establish a de jure moratorium or abolition can be enacted according<br />
to a sustainable reform path and within an appropriate time frame.<br />
Political leaders also play an important role in mobilising public opinion<br />
in favour of the abolition of the death penalty, for instance through<br />
awareness campaigns, public debates and specific educational programs<br />
in schools. I am deeply touched by the experiences of those political<br />
leaders that have directly witnessed the effects of the use of the death<br />
penalty and are actively engaged in the campaign for the moratorium.<br />
Such strong leadership is even more necessary when countries confront<br />
significant threats to their security, including organized crime and<br />
terrorism. Although there is increasing evidence that the death penalty<br />
is not an effective deterrent to crime, statistics are not always enough<br />
to sway public opinion. The sense of insecurity caused by extremism<br />
and widespread violence may lead people to believe that the death<br />
penalty could restore security. It is exactly in such cases, however, that<br />
political leaders are called to play a guiding role and make the case<br />
for the abolition of the death penalty, even if it may seem difficult to<br />
justify. Political responsibility to stop crime and violence does not need<br />
to lead to compromises in terms of human rights. On the contrary, it<br />
makes the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental<br />
freedoms even more necessary. For instance, enhanced efforts could be<br />
made to ensure that terrorists and those responsible for violations of<br />
international humanitarian or human rights law are held to account<br />
through existing international criminal justice mechanisms.<br />
The success of the campaign for a moratorium does not depend<br />
only on the contribution of political leadership. All international and<br />
national institutions and all sectors of civil society should play a leading<br />
role. It is crucial, for example, to enhance cooperation between<br />
political institutions and nongovernmental organizations that possess<br />
specific expertise on the subject. In this regard, I would like to recall<br />
Italy’s experience as a useful example of positive synergy between<br />
national governments and civil society organisations. The Italian<br />
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation has established<br />
a special partnership with Comunità di Sant’Egidio, Hands<br />
off Cain and the Italian branch of Amnesty International. These<br />
organisations have been engaged for a long time in awareness-raising<br />
projects. Their global outreach has significantly contributed to<br />
the success of the campaign for a moratorium on the death penalty.<br />
Their efforts have effectively complemented activities undertaken at<br />
the institutional level.<br />
In many countries, religious leaders can also play a role in the campaign<br />
for the moratorium, in particular where religion and politics<br />
are closely intertwined, or for instance the judicial power is held by a<br />
religious authority. In some cases such a positive interaction could be<br />
more complex, but constructive dialogue is always the best tool for<br />
promoting human rights, even in the most difficult contexts.<br />
Other examples of successful outreach include initiatives carried out<br />
together with the academic or judiciary community of countries<br />
where capital punishment is still practised. Although in such countries<br />
the abolition of the death penalty may not be possible in the short<br />
term, dialogue between human rights experts and legal practitioners<br />
could produce significant results and pave the way for future changes.<br />
In this regard, the support of the United Nations, mainly through the<br />
activities of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights,<br />
can provide invaluable help.<br />
In conclusion, the conditions of individual countries may differ, but<br />
the campaign for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty with<br />
a view to its eventual full abolition will only be successful if it can<br />
count on strong leadership at all levels. Successful political leaders<br />
are able to overcome setbacks and difficulties by reaching out to all<br />
interested parties at the institutional level and within civil society.<br />
This continuous dialogue is instrumental to building the consensus<br />
we need to steadily progress towards a world where justice does not<br />
require the loss of a human life.<br />
280 281