21.07.2016 Views

PENALTY

DBk0302s7Xm

DBk0302s7Xm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were no reports of judicial executions carried out by stoning. In the<br />

United Arab Emirates, one woman was sentenced to death by stoning<br />

for committing “adultery” while married. Public executions were<br />

carried out in Iran and Saudi Arabia.<br />

Justifications for the use of the death penalty<br />

In 2014 an alarming number of countries used the death penalty to<br />

respond to real or perceived threats to state security and public safety<br />

posed by terrorism, crime or internal instability. This is not a new<br />

phenomenon, but it has become a serious concern for the abolitionist<br />

movement as we see more countries and politicians attempt to<br />

defend the use, or resumption, of executions as a solution to crime<br />

and terrorism. As this publication and others have made clear, there<br />

is no evidence that the death penalty has a greater deterrent effect<br />

on crime than imprisonment. When governments present the death<br />

penalty as a solution to crime or insecurity, they are not only misleading<br />

the public but also failing, in many cases, to take the necessary<br />

action to prevent and respond to crime through robust and rights-respecting<br />

criminal justice systems. 4<br />

China, Iran, Iraq and Pakistan executed people convicted of terrorism<br />

in 2014, while Cameroon and the United Arab Emirates expanded<br />

the scope of the death penalty to include terrorism-related crimes.<br />

On 17 December 2014, Pakistan lifted a six-year moratorium on<br />

civilian executions for terrorism-related offences. The decision was in<br />

response to a horrific attack the day before on a school in Peshawar<br />

that left more than 149 people dead, including 132 children. Seven<br />

people, all of whom had been convicted under an anti-terrorism law,<br />

were executed in less than two weeks. The government also pledged<br />

to execute hundreds of people on death row who had been convicted<br />

of terrorism-related offences. By 28 April 2015, the country<br />

had already executed 100 people.<br />

Also in December 2014, Indonesia announced its intention to resume<br />

executions for drug-related offences to confront what it called a<br />

national emergency. On 19 January 2015, six people were executed<br />

and the Indonesian authorities announced plans to put more people<br />

to death throughout the year. On 28 April, eight people, including<br />

Indonesian and foreign nationals, were executed by firing squad. All<br />

of them had been convicted of drug trafficking. The executions went<br />

ahead despite international calls for clemency.<br />

China made use of the death penalty as a tool in the Strike Hard<br />

campaign against terrorism and violent crime in the Xinjiang Uighur<br />

Autonomous Region. Three people were sentenced to death in a<br />

mass sentencing event that was held in an outdoor sports arena in<br />

May 2014. Those sentenced had been convicted of terrorism, separatism<br />

and murder. Between June and August, 21 people were executed<br />

in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region in relation to various<br />

terrorist attacks.<br />

Jordan resumed executions at the end of 2014 after an eight-year<br />

hiatus, executing 11 men for murder. The executions followed the<br />

establishment, weeks before, of a special committee of the Cabinet<br />

to look into lifting the suspension on executions as a deterrent to<br />

murder and in response to public demand.<br />

The ongoing use of the death penalty in<br />

contravention of international law<br />

In 2014, as in the past, many of the states that retain the death penalty<br />

continued to use it in contravention of international law and standards.<br />

Unfair trials, “confessions” extracted through torture or other<br />

ill-treatment, and the use of the death penalty against juvenile offenders<br />

and people with mental or intellectual disabilities and for crimes<br />

other than intentional killing continued to be concerning features of<br />

the use of the death penalty.<br />

4 See Amnesty International, Not Making Us Safer: Crime, Public Safety and the Death Penalty<br />

(London, Amnesty International, 2013), available from www.amnesty.org/en/documents/document/?indexnumber=act51%2f002%2f2013&language=en.<br />

People with mental or intellectual disabilities were under sentence of<br />

death in several countries including Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan,<br />

Trinidad and Tobago and the United States.<br />

288 289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!