12.08.2016 Views

About the Puget Sound Institute

PugetSoundFactbook_v3.0

PugetSoundFactbook_v3.0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2015 <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> Factbook Book | v3.0<br />

breakwaters/jetties, overwater structures, roads within 25 m of <strong>the</strong> shoreline, active &<br />

inactive railroads within 25 m of <strong>the</strong> shoreline.<br />

a. Only 31.3% of <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>’s shoreline has not been modified (i.e.,<br />

none of <strong>the</strong> stressors occurs) (Fresh et al., 2011).<br />

b. Negligible historically, artificial shoreline now represents about 9.5% of <strong>the</strong><br />

shoreline (Fresh et al., 2011).<br />

4. Armoring is clearly <strong>the</strong> most frequently occurring stressor, observed in along 74–78% of<br />

shoreline segments studied (Fresh et al., 2011), followed by nearshore fill (62%) and<br />

overwater structures (30%) (Schlenger et al., 2011).<br />

a. Armoring occurs along 27% of <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> shoreline (1070 of 3969 km)<br />

(Schlenger et al., 2011).<br />

b. The percent of armored shoreline varies considerably (10 to 63 percent) across<br />

<strong>the</strong> sub-basins in <strong>the</strong> study area (Schlenger et al., 2011).<br />

5. An estimated 34.6% of shorelines lack natural vegetation (Simenstad et al., 2011).<br />

a. Riparian vegetation overhanging <strong>the</strong> intertidal zone occurs along only 440 miles<br />

of <strong>the</strong> shoreline of <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> (Clancy et al., 2009).<br />

b. Loss of overhanging vegetation can alter <strong>the</strong> microclimate of beaches for<br />

incubating eggs of intertidal spawning fish (Rice, 2006).<br />

c. Loss of vegetation reduces <strong>the</strong> supply of terrestrial insects falling into nearshore<br />

waters, an important food source for migrating juvenile salmonids (Brennan &<br />

Culverwell, 2004).<br />

6. Fragmentation of nearshore marine habitat by frequent separate smaller anthropogenic<br />

shoreline alterations can reduce biological productivity beyond <strong>the</strong> effects of fewer but<br />

larger alterations (Gaydos et al., 2009).<br />

7. The South Central <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> sub-basin is <strong>the</strong> most impacted sub-basin in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Puget</strong><br />

<strong>Sound</strong> Basin, with 51% of <strong>the</strong> nearshore zone area developed (Schlenger et al., 2011).<br />

a. Only 1% of <strong>the</strong> shoreline segments in this sub-basin had not been modified (Fresh<br />

et al., 2011).<br />

b. The Hood Canal sub-basin is <strong>the</strong> least impacted, with 10 percent of <strong>the</strong> nearshore<br />

zone area developed (Schlenger et al., 2011).<br />

8. Projections suggest that approximately 19 % of nearshore segments studied in <strong>Puget</strong><br />

<strong>Sound</strong> will become more degraded in <strong>the</strong> future (Schlenger et al., 2011). The segments<br />

forecast to degrade comprise 20 % of <strong>the</strong> shoreline length.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!