12.08.2016 Views

About the Puget Sound Institute

PugetSoundFactbook_v3.0

PugetSoundFactbook_v3.0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2015 <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> Factbook Book | v3.0<br />

terrestrial sources. Beach wrack available to beach detritivores is composed of ~60% marine<br />

algae, 24% terrestrial plant materials, and 13% eelgrass.<br />

8. Shoreline armoring reduces talitrid (beach hopper) abundance (Sobocinski et al., 2010),<br />

which is an important food source for shore crabs (Hemigrapsus nudus) (Lewis et al., 2007),<br />

birds and o<strong>the</strong>r animals (Toweil, 1974; Vermeer, 1982).<br />

9. There are many types of detritivores in estuarine and marine ecosystems. Suspension<br />

feeders, such as mussels, littleneck clams, barnacles and oysters, filter food suspended in <strong>the</strong><br />

water as it passes by. By contrast, benthic-deposit feeders engulf sediments, digesting <strong>the</strong><br />

bioavailable portions. Benthic-deposit feeders include several types of clams, polychaete<br />

worms, gastropods, sea cucumbers, crabs and sand dollars. Grazers also depend on benthicassociated<br />

food production, but are not classified as detritivores. Grazers consume (as a<br />

group) a combination of fresh macroalgae, epiphytic algae, and fresh detritus. Grazers<br />

include such organisms as snails, limpits, sea urchins, and chitons (Encyclopedia of <strong>Puget</strong><br />

<strong>Sound</strong>, Herbivores and detritiores in <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>).<br />

10. The benthic and nearshore communities of <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> rely strongly on detritus for food<br />

web support, especially near river mouths, tidal marshes, eelgrass and kelp beds.<br />

Suspension-feeding mussels, for example, obtain between 11-88% of <strong>the</strong>ir nutrition from<br />

detrital sources, depending on <strong>the</strong> season (Hoffnagle et al., 1979; Tallis, 2009; Howe &<br />

Simenstad, 2014), and a variety of estuarine and nearshore invertebrates ultimately derive<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir nutrition from sources o<strong>the</strong>r than phytoplankton (Simenstad & Wissmar, 1985).<br />

The Salish Sea’s intertidal food webs echo those studied across <strong>the</strong> world. From<br />

Amchitka, AK (Duggins et al., 1989), San Francisco Bay, CA (Howe & Simenstad 2011,<br />

2011), and <strong>the</strong> tip of South Africa (Bustamante et al., 1995), strongly relying on detritus<br />

to fuel community metabolism.<br />

11. Detrital food webs support keystone predators, such as <strong>the</strong> Ochre seastar (Pisaster<br />

ochraceus) which plays a key role in regulating community diversity in <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>’s rocky<br />

intertidal habitats (Paine, 1980). P. ochraceus feeds preferentially on barnacles (proportion<br />

of diet = 10-54%) and mussels (~20%). Detritus comprises 11-88% of <strong>the</strong> diet of both prey<br />

species (Tallis, 2009).<br />

Pisaster ochraceus populations have dramatically declined in <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> as a result of<br />

seastar wasting disease. The cause of <strong>the</strong> disease has yet to be unequivocally identified,<br />

but emerging research points to a viral infection of densovirus (Hewson et al., 2014),<br />

perhaps augmented by higher than normal water temperatures (Bates et al., 2009). The<br />

loss of this keystone predatory species indicates that nearshore food webs are dynamic in<br />

space and time, and we expect extensive restructuring of rocky intertidal communities as<br />

a result its removal via densovirus (Paine, 1980).<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!