21.08.2016 Views

Making Every Baby Count

9789241511223-eng

9789241511223-eng

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(e.g. individuals who conduct routine home visits during pregnancy and the postnatal<br />

period). To facilitate their role as reporters, in order to effectively relay the information, they<br />

should be formally connected to the health system through a primary health centre, hospital<br />

or district office.<br />

Where a public health system already has a network of CHWs in place, it may be effective<br />

to train them to take on the identifier-reporter role. Many countries, however, do not have<br />

unified networks of CHWs with sufficient coverage. Alternatively, identification/notification<br />

programmes could be run through district or sub-district networks of identifier-reporters to<br />

capture stillbirths and neonatal deaths in smaller areas. For example, in Cameroon, several<br />

programmes have worked with village mothers’ associations or women’s associations to<br />

assist community-level identification of programme-related outcomes.<br />

It may be possible in some settings to integrate the reporting of stillbirths and neonatal<br />

deaths within other existing public health surveillance efforts. Community-based maternal<br />

death surveillance and response (MDSR) and integrated disease surveillance and response<br />

systems may provide platforms for expansion to include perinatal deaths. In Indonesia, for<br />

example, a training programme for professional midwives to be deployed in villages facilitated<br />

the initiation of community-based perinatal death review (55).<br />

Other public health programmes, including those outside maternal, newborn and child<br />

health, may also provide these opportunities. For example, if a region has an ongoing<br />

polio vaccination campaign to target remote communities, it may be possible to train the<br />

community-based volunteers or campaign staff to identify stillbirths and neonatal deaths<br />

in these communities and notify the health system of their occurrence. For example, the<br />

“Reaching <strong>Every</strong> District” (RED) strategy was undertaken by a group of immunizationtargeting<br />

partners of WHO in 2002 to improve surveillance by re-establishing outreach<br />

services to communities in both urban and rural areas (56).<br />

A variety of reporting mechanisms can be designed to successfully relay information from<br />

community-based identifier-reporters to the public health system, as discussed in the section<br />

on transmission of information, below.<br />

Reviewers<br />

Reviewers are community representatives who participate in perinatal mortality audits.<br />

The composition and roles of the membership of facility-based or national-level steering<br />

committees for these audits are described in Annex 5. There are a few additional considerations<br />

that are particularly important to the community, including representation,<br />

communication and advocacy.<br />

The first consideration in the selection of reviewers of stillbirths and neonatal deaths in<br />

the community is that of representation of the community perspective on these deaths.<br />

Including a member of the community in the facility-based review committee may help<br />

gather more complete information from the community’s perspective on what led to each<br />

stillbirth or neonatal death. For example, a CHW participating in a review may be able to<br />

contribute information on why a family did not seek care earlier or why transportation may<br />

have been delayed.<br />

44 MAKING EVERY BABY COUNT: AUDIT AND REVIEW OF STILLBIRTHS AND NEONATAL DEATHS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!