Making Every Baby Count
9789241511223-eng
9789241511223-eng
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In addition, review committee members should be instructed not to disclose any confidential<br />
information about cases (including names of family or medical or other staff involved,<br />
or any details of the discussions or findings of the review process) outside the review<br />
group. Ideally, anyone with access to any information that contains personal identifiers<br />
should sign a confidentiality agreement, stating that they will not disclose this information.<br />
All records of the cases reviewed and any discussion should be kept secure; hard<br />
copies of information should be kept in locked cabinets/offices, and electronic data kept<br />
in password-protected files. In some types of review, such as confidential enquiries, complete<br />
anonymity is the rule. However, in others, such as facility- and community-based case<br />
reviews, the identity of both the deceased and the health workers involved in the care are<br />
typically known, though care is taken to remove identifying markers in the notes as soon as<br />
possible.<br />
5.3 Developing and disseminating policy and guidelines<br />
A clear, supportive policy has been one of the prerequisites for success in maternal mortality<br />
audit (46, 51). In some cases this has also involved an enabling legal framework,<br />
which may need to be in place before the process begins. Any fear of participation in such<br />
audits can be removed by affording legal protection for assisting in such enquiries while<br />
ensuring cases of gross malpractice will continue to be dealt with by the existing legal procedures.<br />
National guidelines for how to set up an audit committee and conduct meetings,<br />
clear guidance on information transmission, and standardized tools are also helpful. Clear<br />
norms and practice standards for each level of the health system may facilitate a more<br />
objective assessment of modifiable factors associated with each death (38, 63). These will<br />
require periodic review and updating as new evidence emerges, as with the national clinical<br />
guidelines. This process can be led by the national steering committee with ministry of<br />
health guidance.<br />
National guidelines for stillbirth and neonatal death mortality audit may mandate that particular<br />
staff members are designated at various levels to oversee the system and that the<br />
associated tasks and responsibilities are included in their job descriptions. In settings<br />
where midwives provide the majority of care at birth and during the postnatal period, the<br />
system should be developed in such a way that midwives can complete the process from<br />
start to finish and provide leadership at all levels. If resources permit, an outreach person<br />
or regional coordinator who is familiar with the tools and meeting structure can serve<br />
as a liaison between clinical staff, senior management and district decision-makers. This<br />
person can be a valuable resource, especially in ensuring that recommendations result in<br />
actions that are followed up. This system has been one of the key drivers of institutionalization<br />
and successful outcomes in South Africa (41, 47).<br />
5.4 Staff training, ongoing supervision and leadership<br />
District health staff, administrative staff, health workers and other relevant stakeholders<br />
require training specific to their role in the audit process and the level of implementation<br />
of the audit system. This training may be conducted by the ministry of health or through<br />
professional associations. In Uganda, both the Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians<br />
and the Uganda Paediatric Association have been involved in training on the national<br />
MAKING EVERY BABY COUNT: AUDIT AND REVIEW OF STILLBIRTHS AND NEONATAL DEATHS<br />
57