30.12.2016 Views

Modern Blanket Toss: Findings and Observations

This book is the last in a series of three covering the National Science Foundation awarded Modern Blanket Toss project. In this book are the evaluation findings for each of the three years as well as observations from Modern Blanket Toss staff.

This book is the last in a series of three covering the National Science Foundation awarded Modern Blanket Toss project. In this book are the evaluation findings for each of the three years as well as observations from Modern Blanket Toss staff.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2016 FINDINGS<br />

6) Student academic data<br />

Grade Point Average<br />

GPAs of <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Blanket</strong> <strong>Toss</strong> students were higher in than the Upward Bound<br />

students, but not significantly (P = 0.281). However, the shift from pre-program<br />

to post-program was not significant for either group (Table 25).<br />

Table 25 Average pre <strong>and</strong> post-program student GPA for <strong>Modern</strong><br />

<strong>Blanket</strong> <strong>Toss</strong> participants <strong>and</strong> Upward Bound control group<br />

students program in the summer of 2014.<br />

GPA Pre-<br />

Program<br />

GPA Post-<br />

Program<br />

<strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Blanket</strong> <strong>Toss</strong> (n=16) 3.07 3.09 0.764<br />

Upward Bound Control (n=15) 2.73 2.84 0.151<br />

Sig.<br />

Number of Math Courses <strong>and</strong> grades<br />

The number of math courses completed by <strong>Modern</strong><br />

<strong>Blanket</strong> <strong>Toss</strong> students <strong>and</strong> Upward Bound control group<br />

students was not significantly different either at preprogram<br />

or post-program (Table 26).<br />

Table 26 Average number of math courses completed pre- <strong>and</strong> post-program for<br />

<strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Blanket</strong> <strong>Toss</strong> participants <strong>and</strong> Upward Bound control group students<br />

Count of Math<br />

Courses<br />

Pre-Program<br />

Average Courses<br />

Per Student<br />

Count of Math<br />

Courses<br />

Post-Program<br />

Average Courses<br />

Per Student<br />

<strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Blanket</strong> <strong>Toss</strong> (n=17) 30 1.76 25 1.47<br />

Upward Bound Control (n=18) 32 1.78 28 1.56<br />

<br />

The average math pre-program grade for <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Blanket</strong> <strong>Toss</strong> participants was<br />

significantly higher than that of the control group students (P = 0.021). However,<br />

the shift from pre-program to post-program was not significant for either group<br />

(Table 27).<br />

Table 27 Average pre <strong>and</strong> post-program average math grades for<br />

<strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Blanket</strong> <strong>Toss</strong> participants <strong>and</strong> Upward Bound control<br />

group students<br />

Math Pre-<br />

Program<br />

Math Post-<br />

Program<br />

<strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Blanket</strong> <strong>Toss</strong> (n=17) 2.87 2.83 0.765<br />

Upward Bound Control (n=18) 2.07 2.56 0.238<br />

Sig.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!