WOMEN IN TECH THE FACTS
womenintech_facts_fullreport_05132016
womenintech_facts_fullreport_05132016
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
03<br />
<strong>IN</strong>STITUTIONAL BARRIERS:<br />
How Do Biases Influence Recruitment?<br />
CHAPTER SNAPSHOT: FOUR BARRIERS TO RECRUITMENT<br />
> > Job Ads: Biased and exclusionary language.<br />
> > The Recruiting Process: Hiring people like ourselves.<br />
> > The Interview and Selection Context: Practices that trigger stereotype threat<br />
and other biases.<br />
> > The Physical Office Environment: Subtle cues about who belongs here.<br />
Key Takeaways<br />
> > Job ads often contain language and other subtle cues that discourage<br />
women and other underrepresented candidates from applying.<br />
> > Resume review and selection criteria often embed unconscious bias.<br />
> > The technical interview context often triggers stereotype threat and can<br />
prevent interview teams from recognizing highly qualified talent even<br />
when it is right in front of them.<br />
> > The physical environment can communicate who does and does not fit-in,<br />
ultimately influencing candidates’ decisions about joining a company.<br />
FOUR BARRIERS TO RECRUITMENT<br />
This chapter focuses on how implicit bias plays out in institutional practices related to recruiting.<br />
Often, these biases are difficult to recognize because they are embedded into the “normal” operations<br />
of recruiting and appear to be “just the way it is.” When left unchecked, however, they cause hiring<br />
managers and others to miss out on finding and hiring many highly qualified candidates.<br />
28 <strong>WOMEN</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>TECH</strong>: <strong>THE</strong> <strong>FACTS</strong> NCWIT // ncwit.org