SENATE
2mKfSKX
2mKfSKX
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Wednesday, 1 March 2017 Senate Page 47<br />
Senator Payne: Most certainly this year and, indeed, this side of the financial year, yes.<br />
Senator XENOPHON: Thank you.<br />
Senator GALLACHER: We were told yesterday that there are 400 projected losses of jobs between February<br />
and December. So how urgently is the minister taking this forward plan announcement? That is 530.<br />
Senator Payne: I think the quantifiable difference between how urgently this government and the relevant<br />
ministers are taking this and, for example, yours is that we are in the process of commissioning 54 different naval<br />
vessels ranging across specific patrol boats, offshore patrol vessels, future frigates and future submarines. You, of<br />
course, commissioned not one ship from one Australian shipyard in six years. So that is an indication of the<br />
priority—<br />
Senator GALLACHER: I think I have heard that before.<br />
Senator Payne: that the government places on this matter. The development of the naval shipbuilding plan is<br />
making excellent progress. As I said, the minister will release it imminently.<br />
Senator GALLACHER: And we have 400 projected job losses on top of—<br />
Senator Payne: And as you know, Senator—<br />
Senator GALLACHER: Sorry, Minister. On top of 130 we have already lost this year.<br />
Senator Payne: Had you done anything about that, that might have been avoided. But it was not because you<br />
did nothing.<br />
Senator GALLACHER: Well, do something. There are 530 South Australians in the firing line in 2017. You<br />
have got your hand on the till. You can make a decision.<br />
Senator Payne: Yes, Senator. And we are working towards the cutting of steel on the offshore patrol vessels<br />
in 2018 and on the future frigates in 2020 at Osborne in South Australia. As I said, we have commissioned over<br />
50 vessels in the name of the Australian government since we were elected in 2013 to address capability issues<br />
that you failed to respond to in six years in government. So it is frankly a little rich for you to say this government<br />
is doing nothing.<br />
Senator GALLACHER: I did not say the government is doing nothing.<br />
Senator Payne: I think you might have implied that.<br />
Senator GALLACHER: The workforce planning happening at the moment indicates 325 permanent—<br />
Senator Payne: Indeed.<br />
Senator GALLACHER: and 75 contractors. Some of them are apprentices. The decision that needs to be<br />
made is to allow the workforce planning for 2018 to be made.<br />
Senator Payne: And that is part of the naval shipbuilding plan. It is part of the development of the naval<br />
shipbuilding plan and a very important part of it.<br />
Senator GALLACHER: So urgency.<br />
Senator Payne: And I said it will be released imminently.<br />
Senator GALLACHER: Imminently?<br />
Senator Payne: I am using the words of the Minister for Defence Industry, but he and I are working in the<br />
same space on this, and that is the case.<br />
Senator GALLACHER: Forget me. There are many thousands of South Australian families that would like<br />
the imminently to be a decision made as quickly as possible.<br />
Senator Payne: Yes. I am sure that they have reminded you of that many times.<br />
Mr Richardson: I might just add that in addition to the ships that the minister specifically mentioned, we<br />
have finished with the department of education work on the establishment of a maritime training college. We have<br />
done our work in terms of workforce requirements. We are in the process of going out to educational institutions.<br />
We are doing all of this in a very full and proper way. I also note that we will be commencing work on the<br />
additional infrastructure at Osborne in the second half of this year. So there is a lot of activity going on.<br />
Senator XENOPHON: I will resume. Minister, if a plan was to be finalised in 2016, why did the government<br />
appoint Mr Jim McDowell as the government's adviser for the naval shipbuilding plan development in December?<br />
As you are aware, Mr McDowell is a director of Austal, one of the companies that will ultimately compete for<br />
build work in the naval shipbuilding program. Can you not see a massive conflict of interest in this appointment?<br />
FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE