12.12.2012 Views

Energiforsyning i Arktis – hvilken vej vælger Grønland? - Artek ...

Energiforsyning i Arktis – hvilken vej vælger Grønland? - Artek ...

Energiforsyning i Arktis – hvilken vej vælger Grønland? - Artek ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a) b)<br />

Figure 6: Gas hydrates in different shapes from the Hydrate Ridge, Oregon in 2000 (TECFLUX,<br />

IFM-GEOMAR).<br />

2. Potential Energy Source<br />

Over the last decades, many countries have<br />

become very interested in exploiting gas<br />

hydrates as a potential energy source. This<br />

has been of particular importance for<br />

countries like Japan and India who do not<br />

have direct access to other fossil fuel<br />

sources.<br />

One argument for using gas hydrates as an<br />

energy source is the enormous amount of<br />

methane that is globally stored in gas<br />

hydrates. Most recent calculations predict<br />

that about 10 x 10 15 m 3 to 40 x 10 15 m 3<br />

methane occur in gas hydrate deposits<br />

(Kvenvolden, 1999). Alone in the Arctic<br />

Basin more than 1.1 x 10 15 m 3 methane can<br />

be found (Kvenvolden & Grantz, 1990).<br />

However, it should be mentioned that these<br />

numbers are rough estimations that are<br />

based on limited data. Besides the large<br />

amount of methane that is globally stored<br />

(Collett & Kuuskraa, 1998), other<br />

advantages are that the energy density of<br />

gas hydrates is 2-5 times larger than for<br />

conventional natural gas (MacDonald, 1990)<br />

and that they appear at shallow sediment<br />

depths within 2,000 m of the surface<br />

(Kvenvolden, 1999) and should thus be<br />

accessible for exploration.<br />

Although gas hydrates seem to be an<br />

important energy source in the future, a<br />

number of negative factors are responsible<br />

for the limited interest in the development<br />

of exploration technologies so far. One<br />

56<br />

factor is the low permeability in the<br />

sediments where gas hydrates occur, which<br />

makes the access to the methane in the gas<br />

hydrates very difficult, at least with<br />

exploration techniques commonly used for<br />

methane or oil production. Without<br />

permeability only small accumulations of gas<br />

can be found and moreover, the<br />

accumulated gas cannot move into<br />

production wells fast enough. In<br />

consequence, the methane cannot be<br />

produced by drilling (Levorsen, 1967) and<br />

new technologies need to be invented.<br />

Moreover, the significant gas hydrate<br />

deposits are far away from the existing<br />

conventional gas fields and thus, new<br />

expensive infrastructure needs to be built.<br />

Due to all these complications and the fact<br />

that alternative resources (i.e., oil and<br />

conventional gas) are still available, the<br />

development of gas hydrate exploration<br />

techniques is only slowly advancing. So far,<br />

no field study has been successful,<br />

including, for example, the Messoyakha gas<br />

field project in Western Siberia (Makogon,<br />

1997, Collett, 1993).<br />

However, a variety of new gas hydrate<br />

research programs in different parts of the<br />

world are currently underway. Japan and<br />

India, for example, have started to<br />

implement large-scale field studies (Collett<br />

& Kuuskraa, 1998), and the USA has<br />

initiated an intense program in the US Gulf<br />

of Mexico (DOE Gulf of Mexico Joint Industry<br />

Project, 2009). Moreover, the German IFM-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!