13.12.2012 Views

COAST ARTILLERY, JOURNAL - Air Defense Artillery

COAST ARTILLERY, JOURNAL - Air Defense Artillery

COAST ARTILLERY, JOURNAL - Air Defense Artillery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROFESSIONAL NOTES 563<br />

The eight practices were fired in the following order: Battery A, mortars;<br />

E, 12-inch guns; F, lO-inch guns; B, mortars, all on July 12; and on July 13,<br />

D, mortars; H, 12-inch guns; G, 10-inch guns; and C, mortars. This made it<br />

necessary for the spotting detail to move between each two practices. Only one<br />

spotting bo~rd was available, but there were enough azimuth instruments. available<br />

for all of the spotting stations used. The moves were made without delaying the<br />

practices.<br />

Notwithstand the brief traiuing of the detail, they lost only one of' the 32 shots<br />

fired by the gun batteries at ranges varying from 9,200 to 10,500 yards, and for<br />

the 31 splashes spotted the mean difference between the spotters' report and the<br />

longitudinal deviations subsequently obtained by the plot of the splashes from<br />

the camera and lateral deviation records was only 27 yards. Thirteen, or 42 per cent.<br />

of these shots, were spotted within 12 yards, and 71 per cent were spotted within 30<br />

yards. <strong>Air</strong>plane observation was available for seven of these shots, one of which<br />

was lost by the airplane. For the other. six the results obtained by the terrestrial<br />

spotters and the airplane observer were practically identical, the former being<br />

somewhat closer and so much more rapid that the report had been received from<br />

the terrestrial spotting detail and the resulting correction made and applied before<br />

the airplane report was received. The airplane report was transmitted by radio<br />

to the radio station and thence relayed by telephone, the telephone wire being<br />

kept open.<br />

The result in the case of the four mortar p~actices was not so satisfactory as<br />

to accuracy, probably on account of the special situation obtaining at the battery<br />

which was fired. The entire target course is hidden from this battery by a large<br />

island, on the left end of which the primary station is located. The observer of<br />

lateral deviations and the observer of the azimuth of the target at the instant<br />

of splash were both placed at the primary station on the island where one of the<br />

spotting observers was also located and an effort of the details for the three<br />

functions to cooperate seems to have worked badly. Under this arrangement, also,<br />

the lateral deviations on which, with the camera recor~, the plot of deviations is<br />

based, being observed at an angle of from forty to eighty degrees with the target<br />

course and most of the impacts being nearer the forty than the eighty degree end<br />

of the course, a slight error by thl" observer of lateral errors might make a large<br />

error in plotting the splash. Excessive armament errors developed tend to encourage<br />

the suspicion that all of the spotting errors show might not in fact have been<br />

spotting errors.<br />

Be that as it may, the average spotting error shown for the mortar practices<br />

on the twelfth was 209 yards, and on the thirteenth, 60 yards, or' a mean of 132<br />

yards for the entire 30 mortar shots observed, two having been reported as lost.<br />

The result obtained in the gun practices is believed to be the more reliable<br />

criterion of the system. Three errors of 30 yards in the spotting were directly due<br />

to a fault of the particular board used, the head of the pivot extending 30 yards<br />

from the center of the board and concealing the 20-yard line passing under it for<br />

a distance of approximately 60 yards. In each of the cases referred to a shot<br />

falling 20 yards short was reported ten yards over through the inability of the<br />

board operator's eye to carry the line through this area where it could not he<br />

actually seen. So large a head for the pivot was not necessary and this type of<br />

error also would be minimized "ith a larger board.<br />

The result was obtained with a board having a scale of 160 yards to the<br />

inch and reading lines spaced 20 yards apart. With a scale of 100 yards to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!