07.09.2017 Views

2016 Global Review of Constitutional Law

I-CONnect–Clough Center collaboration.

I-CONnect–Clough Center collaboration.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Brazil<br />

DEVELOPMENTS IN BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW<br />

Luís Roberto Barroso, Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice, Tenured Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Constitutional</strong> <strong>Law</strong> at the Rio de Janeiro State University. Juliano Zaiden Benvindo,<br />

Tenured Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Constitutional</strong> <strong>Law</strong> at the University <strong>of</strong> Brasília; and Aline Osorio,<br />

Clerk <strong>of</strong> the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court and Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Constitutional</strong> <strong>Law</strong> at the<br />

University Center <strong>of</strong> Brasília.<br />

BRAZIL<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Developments in Brazilian <strong>Constitutional</strong><br />

<strong>Law</strong> in the year <strong>2016</strong> were shaped by<br />

deepening economic, political, and social<br />

turmoil, and by the repercussions <strong>of</strong> investigations<br />

into widespread corruption implicating<br />

high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile political actors and leading<br />

companies.<br />

In politics, we went through a traumatic<br />

impeachment trial against President Rousseff;<br />

the speaker <strong>of</strong> the Lower House was<br />

removed from <strong>of</strong>fice and later arrested on<br />

corruption charges; and the speaker <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Senate has been indicted on charges <strong>of</strong> embezzlement<br />

and removed from the presidential<br />

line <strong>of</strong> succession. Hundreds <strong>of</strong> political<br />

figures from diverse political parties are currently<br />

under investigation for graft, money<br />

laundering, and other crimes, mostly within<br />

“Car Wash Operation”.<br />

In the economic field, Brazil has been facing<br />

a severe recession, with a shrinking GDP, rising<br />

unemployment, and the hemorrhaging <strong>of</strong><br />

public finances. The fiscal crisis has had a<br />

major impact on the member states’ economies,<br />

many <strong>of</strong> which have been struggling<br />

to meet their payrolls and maintain essential<br />

public services. In the social realm, the widespread<br />

popular discontent with and cynicism<br />

toward the political class, coupled with the<br />

fear <strong>of</strong> impending setbacks to the protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> social rights, gave rise to people’s protests<br />

and to the “Occupy Schools” movement led<br />

by students nationwide.<br />

It would be naive to assume that the storm<br />

would not hit the Supreme Court. If, in Brazil,<br />

there was already a tendency toward the<br />

judicialization <strong>of</strong> politics, in times <strong>of</strong> crisis<br />

this inclination has become even more clear.<br />

Throughout the year, the Court was called<br />

upon to intervene in several core political,<br />

economic, and social controversies. Taking<br />

the position as arbiter <strong>of</strong> national disputes,<br />

it was nonetheless thrust into the heart <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crisis.<br />

THE CONSTITUTION AND<br />

THE COURT<br />

The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF),<br />

the apex court <strong>of</strong> the country’s judiciary,<br />

comprises 11 justices, appointed by the President<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Republic and confirmed by the<br />

absolute majority <strong>of</strong> the Federal Senate. The<br />

justices have life tenure and are subject to<br />

mandatory retirement at age 75.<br />

The STF has primary responsibility for safeguarding<br />

the Constitution. Brazil’s 1988<br />

Constitution adopts a hybrid or mixed system<br />

<strong>of</strong> judicial review, which combines aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> both the American and European models.<br />

From America, we derived a concrete and<br />

diffuse form <strong>of</strong> review: every judge or court<br />

has the authority to adjudicate on claims<br />

<strong>of</strong> constitutional violation in a case. The<br />

constitutional issues raised in the various<br />

courts can ultimately be brought before the<br />

STF through “extraordinary appeals” (RE),<br />

whereby the Court examines if the appealed<br />

decision violates the Constitution. Extraordi-<br />

<strong>2016</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Constitutional</strong> <strong>Law</strong> | 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!