07.09.2017 Views

2016 Global Review of Constitutional Law

I-CONnect–Clough Center collaboration.

I-CONnect–Clough Center collaboration.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

France<br />

DEVELOPMENTS IN FRENCH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW<br />

Corinne Luquiens, Member <strong>of</strong> the Conseil constitutionnel; Nefeli Lefkopoulou, Ph.D.<br />

Candidate at Sciences Po <strong>Law</strong> School; Eirini Tsoumani, Ph.D. Candidate at Sciences<br />

Po <strong>Law</strong> School; and Guillaume Tusseau, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Law</strong> at Sciences Po <strong>Law</strong><br />

School, Member <strong>of</strong> the Institut universitaire de France<br />

FRANCE<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>2016</strong> was an important year for the French<br />

Conseil constitutionnel. From an organic<br />

viewpoint, one third <strong>of</strong> its members were<br />

renewed. From a substantive viewpoint, the<br />

new bench had to face the consequences <strong>of</strong><br />

the continuing application <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong><br />

emergency that has been in force since November<br />

2015. In the 113 rulings it handed<br />

down, the Conseil made use <strong>of</strong> all the jurisdictional<br />

techniques it has developed over<br />

the years in order to control the activities<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Parliament that was, despite a socialist<br />

majority in the National Assembly, highly<br />

divided.<br />

THE CONSTITUTION AND<br />

THE COURT<br />

The drafters <strong>of</strong> the 1958 Constitution meant<br />

to introduce crucial changes regarding the<br />

way the Constitution was made binding on<br />

public authorities. According to Michel Debré,<br />

“The creation <strong>of</strong> the Conseil constitutionnel<br />

manifests the will to subordinate the<br />

law, that is to say the will <strong>of</strong> Parliament, to<br />

the superior rule laid down by the Constitution.<br />

It is neither in the spirit <strong>of</strong> the parliamentary<br />

system, nor in the French tradition,<br />

to give judges, that is to say to give every<br />

litigant, the right to question the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

law. The project has therefore devised a special<br />

institution that can only be set in motion<br />

by four authorities: the President <strong>of</strong> the Republic,<br />

the Prime Minister and the Presidents<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Houses <strong>of</strong> Parliament. To this Conseil<br />

other assignments were given, including the<br />

review <strong>of</strong> Parliament’s standing orders, and<br />

the litigation related to contested elections,<br />

in order to avoid the scandal <strong>of</strong> partisan invalidations.<br />

The Constitution thus created a<br />

weapon against the deviation <strong>of</strong> the parliamentary<br />

system.” 1<br />

The Conseil consists <strong>of</strong> the former Presidents<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Republic and nine appointed<br />

members, serving non-renewable terms <strong>of</strong><br />

nine years. One-third <strong>of</strong> them are appointed<br />

every three years. Three, among whom is<br />

the President <strong>of</strong> the Conseil, are appointed<br />

by the President <strong>of</strong> the Republic, three by<br />

the President <strong>of</strong> the National Assembly, and<br />

three by the President <strong>of</strong> the Senate. The Parliament’s<br />

commissions are allowed to veto<br />

a nomination with a supermajority <strong>of</strong> threefifths.<br />

In March <strong>2016</strong>, three new members<br />

were appointed to the Conseil, among whom<br />

its President, Laurent Fabius, is the former<br />

Minister <strong>of</strong> Foreign Affairs.<br />

The Conseil’s most significant function in the<br />

French statute-centred (légicentriste) context<br />

is that <strong>of</strong> reviewing the constitutionality <strong>of</strong><br />

legislation. The standard <strong>of</strong> constitutional review<br />

is not limited to the constitutional text<br />

strictly understood. Since the 70-39 DC and<br />

the (more famous) 71-44 DC rulings, it has<br />

grown into a wider “constitutionality block”<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> the Preamble to the Constitution,<br />

the Declaration <strong>of</strong> the Rights <strong>of</strong> Man<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the Citizen (1789), the Preamble to<br />

the Constitution <strong>of</strong> 1946, the Charter for the<br />

Environment, and several unwritten “fundamental<br />

principles acknowledged in the<br />

1<br />

For a general overview, see O Duhamel and G Tusseau, Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques<br />

(4th ed Le Seuil <strong>2016</strong>)<br />

<strong>2016</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Constitutional</strong> <strong>Law</strong> | 67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!