2016 Global Review of Constitutional Law
I-CONnect–Clough Center collaboration.
I-CONnect–Clough Center collaboration.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
France<br />
DEVELOPMENTS IN FRENCH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW<br />
Corinne Luquiens, Member <strong>of</strong> the Conseil constitutionnel; Nefeli Lefkopoulou, Ph.D.<br />
Candidate at Sciences Po <strong>Law</strong> School; Eirini Tsoumani, Ph.D. Candidate at Sciences<br />
Po <strong>Law</strong> School; and Guillaume Tusseau, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Law</strong> at Sciences Po <strong>Law</strong><br />
School, Member <strong>of</strong> the Institut universitaire de France<br />
FRANCE<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>2016</strong> was an important year for the French<br />
Conseil constitutionnel. From an organic<br />
viewpoint, one third <strong>of</strong> its members were<br />
renewed. From a substantive viewpoint, the<br />
new bench had to face the consequences <strong>of</strong><br />
the continuing application <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong><br />
emergency that has been in force since November<br />
2015. In the 113 rulings it handed<br />
down, the Conseil made use <strong>of</strong> all the jurisdictional<br />
techniques it has developed over<br />
the years in order to control the activities<br />
<strong>of</strong> a Parliament that was, despite a socialist<br />
majority in the National Assembly, highly<br />
divided.<br />
THE CONSTITUTION AND<br />
THE COURT<br />
The drafters <strong>of</strong> the 1958 Constitution meant<br />
to introduce crucial changes regarding the<br />
way the Constitution was made binding on<br />
public authorities. According to Michel Debré,<br />
“The creation <strong>of</strong> the Conseil constitutionnel<br />
manifests the will to subordinate the<br />
law, that is to say the will <strong>of</strong> Parliament, to<br />
the superior rule laid down by the Constitution.<br />
It is neither in the spirit <strong>of</strong> the parliamentary<br />
system, nor in the French tradition,<br />
to give judges, that is to say to give every<br />
litigant, the right to question the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
law. The project has therefore devised a special<br />
institution that can only be set in motion<br />
by four authorities: the President <strong>of</strong> the Republic,<br />
the Prime Minister and the Presidents<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Houses <strong>of</strong> Parliament. To this Conseil<br />
other assignments were given, including the<br />
review <strong>of</strong> Parliament’s standing orders, and<br />
the litigation related to contested elections,<br />
in order to avoid the scandal <strong>of</strong> partisan invalidations.<br />
The Constitution thus created a<br />
weapon against the deviation <strong>of</strong> the parliamentary<br />
system.” 1<br />
The Conseil consists <strong>of</strong> the former Presidents<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Republic and nine appointed<br />
members, serving non-renewable terms <strong>of</strong><br />
nine years. One-third <strong>of</strong> them are appointed<br />
every three years. Three, among whom is<br />
the President <strong>of</strong> the Conseil, are appointed<br />
by the President <strong>of</strong> the Republic, three by<br />
the President <strong>of</strong> the National Assembly, and<br />
three by the President <strong>of</strong> the Senate. The Parliament’s<br />
commissions are allowed to veto<br />
a nomination with a supermajority <strong>of</strong> threefifths.<br />
In March <strong>2016</strong>, three new members<br />
were appointed to the Conseil, among whom<br />
its President, Laurent Fabius, is the former<br />
Minister <strong>of</strong> Foreign Affairs.<br />
The Conseil’s most significant function in the<br />
French statute-centred (légicentriste) context<br />
is that <strong>of</strong> reviewing the constitutionality <strong>of</strong><br />
legislation. The standard <strong>of</strong> constitutional review<br />
is not limited to the constitutional text<br />
strictly understood. Since the 70-39 DC and<br />
the (more famous) 71-44 DC rulings, it has<br />
grown into a wider “constitutionality block”<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> the Preamble to the Constitution,<br />
the Declaration <strong>of</strong> the Rights <strong>of</strong> Man<br />
and <strong>of</strong> the Citizen (1789), the Preamble to<br />
the Constitution <strong>of</strong> 1946, the Charter for the<br />
Environment, and several unwritten “fundamental<br />
principles acknowledged in the<br />
1<br />
For a general overview, see O Duhamel and G Tusseau, Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques<br />
(4th ed Le Seuil <strong>2016</strong>)<br />
<strong>2016</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Constitutional</strong> <strong>Law</strong> | 67