11.09.2017 Views

RiskUKSeptember2017

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Changing Face of Security Services: Brexit<br />

security industry, in particular, can pick and<br />

choose their next move.<br />

That being so, this leaves a pool of – dare I<br />

say this – poorer-qualified applicants with less<br />

experience, or those individuals with no<br />

experience at all.<br />

For the latter, we need to bear in mind that<br />

the security industry may not be an attractive<br />

option when hours, shift patterns and salary<br />

levels are all taken into account.<br />

Historically, therefore, like many labourintensive<br />

industries, security has always<br />

welcomed a broad mix of individuals from<br />

overseas, and if entry into the UK is to be made<br />

more difficult for migrants, or the number of<br />

immigrants is otherwise limited in some way,<br />

then we will all have to recruit more homegrown<br />

talent.<br />

Future considerations<br />

If this is the case, as an industry we will need to<br />

consider two things. First, how do we go about<br />

making security and security companies<br />

themselves more attractive as a career for<br />

potential employees? Second, but inextricably<br />

linked with the first point, how do we go about<br />

raising salary and benefit levels to attract the<br />

right people in the first instance?<br />

The answer to the second question poses a<br />

real conundrum as it’s not something that’s<br />

directly within our control. Site-based<br />

remuneration is in the hands of our customers.<br />

Unless we see a universal shift across the<br />

industry, and stand together to drive positive<br />

change, a low-price option will still be a choice<br />

for end users in what some of them view as the<br />

race for the bottom.<br />

On that note, for years now many of us in the<br />

guarding sector have bemoaned the increase in<br />

skills and quality sought on some contracts<br />

when viewed alongside an apparent – and, in<br />

some instances, actual – unwillingness on the<br />

part of customers to pay for that situation.<br />

Our officers are constantly being asked to do<br />

more with – or for – less. Their roles and<br />

responsibilities have widened. Their remit often<br />

extends beyond security into Front of House<br />

services, Health and Safety and facilities<br />

management. With the evolution of services<br />

has come the need for greater training and<br />

additional management support. Yet all the<br />

while the fees being paid for such services have<br />

been heading downwards and not up.<br />

Perhaps Brexit will have a positive impact<br />

here? We can certainly hope so.<br />

Security’s attractiveness<br />

With regards to making our industry more<br />

attractive for potential new recruits, many of us<br />

“It has been up to individual security companies to make<br />

tough choices over pay levels and benefits for their nonsite<br />

based staff and for customers who recognise the value<br />

of their security to ‘up the ante’ in terms of contract rates”<br />

felt that SIA licensing was the advent of a new<br />

dawn. The promise from the Regulator and<br />

those in power in Westminster at the time was<br />

that it meant ‘cowboy’ operators would be<br />

exposed and forced out of business.<br />

Perhaps more importantly, licensing and<br />

regulation also meant that standards would be<br />

raised and officers given the credit for the<br />

difficult tasks they perform. It signalled a<br />

positive move towards the highly successful<br />

Scandinavian model wherein security is viewed<br />

as a respected career of choice.<br />

Unfortunately, this hasn’t turned out to be<br />

the case. In the real world, it has been up to<br />

individual security companies to make tough<br />

choices over pay levels and benefits for their<br />

non-site based staff (with one eye on everdecreasing<br />

margin levels) and for customers<br />

who recognise the value of their security to ‘up<br />

the ante’ in terms of contract rates.<br />

If the price of security to end users were to<br />

increase, there would undoubtedly be a<br />

concerted movement towards ever-smarter<br />

solutions incorporating the latest technology<br />

and reduced manpower. Here, we’re talking<br />

about solutions that many companies would<br />

welcome due to the increased margins often<br />

produced from such outcomes.<br />

Closer to home<br />

In reality, at this present moment nobody really<br />

knows the true impact that Brexit will have on<br />

our industry, or indeed any other industry for<br />

that matter. What we do know, however, is that<br />

if we reduce the pool from which we can recruit<br />

then a difficult situation will be made even<br />

more difficult still. If security businesses can no<br />

longer rely on a steady flow of talent influx from<br />

across Europe then we may have to look closer<br />

to home for a solution.<br />

During the lead-up to the EU Referendum, we<br />

were all inundated with truths, half-truths and<br />

what have subsequently been shown to be<br />

falsehoods to try and win our vote. This<br />

scenario doesn’t appear to have changed.<br />

We all have our opinions of what might<br />

happen post-Brexit and we all want to remain<br />

optimistic about our future prospects. One<br />

thing’s for sure, though. If we are to realise a<br />

positive outcome for the security business<br />

sector, we must put company interests aside<br />

and all work together for the greater good.<br />

David Mundell: Managing<br />

Director of Axis Security<br />

37<br />

www.risk-uk.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!