RiskUKSeptember2017
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
News Analysis: British Standard 8593 for Body-Worn Video<br />
British Standard 8593:2017 focusing on body-worn<br />
video cameras backed by industry<br />
British Standard 8593 delivers a common<br />
framework to boost public trust in the<br />
understanding of where and when bodyworn<br />
video can be employed, with the<br />
document providing technical and operational<br />
recommendations for its appropriate and<br />
proportionate deployment and use.<br />
The new British Standard was drawn up to<br />
address a gap in guidance due to the<br />
differences between the use of CCTV and bodyworn<br />
video, and also with a view to avoiding<br />
any repeat of the privacy concerns associated<br />
with the widespread roll-out of the former. The<br />
UK is widely believed to be the most surveilled<br />
state in the world.<br />
BS 8593:2017 covers planning and<br />
operational recommendations, outlining the<br />
need for body-worn video’s deployment to be<br />
based on legitimate reasons, and particularly<br />
so in terms of undertaking those all-important<br />
privacy impact assessments.<br />
Anne Hayes, head of market development for<br />
governance and resilience at the BSI,<br />
explained: “During the development of BS<br />
8593, it was agreed that public confidence in<br />
the operation and management of body-worn<br />
video was and is critical. Balancing safety,<br />
security and privacy matters is a central<br />
concern. The involvement of both security and<br />
privacy groups shows that British Standards<br />
can deliver industry consensus by aligning<br />
agendas to the public benefit. Body-worn video<br />
has an advantage as a security device in terms<br />
of providing the end user with a sense of<br />
protection. It’s a second pair of ‘eyes and ears’<br />
should something go wrong.”<br />
Tony Porter QPM LLB, the Surveillance<br />
Camera Commissioner, added: “I’m absolutely<br />
delighted to support the new British Standard<br />
and acknowledge the excellent work which has<br />
been undertaken to deliver it in such short<br />
timescales. As the use of body-worn cameras<br />
proliferates, so they become more and more<br />
ingrained as an intrusive capability in the daily<br />
lives of citizens. The important and<br />
fundamental balance of preserving the rights of<br />
citizens while keeping our communities safe<br />
and secure is at the heart of the Home<br />
Secretary’s Surveillance Camera Code of<br />
Practice which, of course, I regulate. The<br />
principles within that Code are resident at the<br />
very heart of the new British Standard and I<br />
commend its introduction.”<br />
With body-worn video cameras now widely adopted by<br />
councils and police services across the UK, and in direct<br />
response to concerns over data security and privacy, a new<br />
British Standard (BS 8593:2017 Code of Practice for the<br />
Deployment and Use of Body-Worn Video) has been<br />
developed in conjunction with security and privacy groups<br />
including the Home Office, the Metropolitan Police Service<br />
and Big Brother Watch*. Brian Sims reports<br />
Legitimate deployment<br />
Examples of the legitimate deployment of bodyworn<br />
video cameras can include:<br />
• Safeguarding employee safety and security<br />
where a given end user of body-worn video may<br />
be at risk of physical or verbal attack or is<br />
otherwise working in a hazardous environment<br />
• As a deterrent if the device wearer is involved<br />
in policing or controlling an environment which<br />
people could try to disrupt<br />
• Evidence capture if the body-worn video user<br />
is involved in a role where they might witness<br />
or investigate criminal activity, and where<br />
capturing visual or audio evidence could assist<br />
with future legal proceedings<br />
• Promoting transparency where device wearers<br />
(such as bailiffs or parking wardens, for<br />
example) regularly encounter complaints<br />
• Capturing data to use in process improvement<br />
or training (identifying learning opportunities)<br />
Device recommendations such as<br />
functionality, weight, image quality and<br />
Tony Porter QPM LLB:<br />
Surveillance Camera<br />
Commissioner<br />
9<br />
www.risk-uk.com