11.09.2017 Views

RiskUKSeptember2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

News Analysis: British Standard 8593 for Body-Worn Video<br />

British Standard 8593:2017 focusing on body-worn<br />

video cameras backed by industry<br />

British Standard 8593 delivers a common<br />

framework to boost public trust in the<br />

understanding of where and when bodyworn<br />

video can be employed, with the<br />

document providing technical and operational<br />

recommendations for its appropriate and<br />

proportionate deployment and use.<br />

The new British Standard was drawn up to<br />

address a gap in guidance due to the<br />

differences between the use of CCTV and bodyworn<br />

video, and also with a view to avoiding<br />

any repeat of the privacy concerns associated<br />

with the widespread roll-out of the former. The<br />

UK is widely believed to be the most surveilled<br />

state in the world.<br />

BS 8593:2017 covers planning and<br />

operational recommendations, outlining the<br />

need for body-worn video’s deployment to be<br />

based on legitimate reasons, and particularly<br />

so in terms of undertaking those all-important<br />

privacy impact assessments.<br />

Anne Hayes, head of market development for<br />

governance and resilience at the BSI,<br />

explained: “During the development of BS<br />

8593, it was agreed that public confidence in<br />

the operation and management of body-worn<br />

video was and is critical. Balancing safety,<br />

security and privacy matters is a central<br />

concern. The involvement of both security and<br />

privacy groups shows that British Standards<br />

can deliver industry consensus by aligning<br />

agendas to the public benefit. Body-worn video<br />

has an advantage as a security device in terms<br />

of providing the end user with a sense of<br />

protection. It’s a second pair of ‘eyes and ears’<br />

should something go wrong.”<br />

Tony Porter QPM LLB, the Surveillance<br />

Camera Commissioner, added: “I’m absolutely<br />

delighted to support the new British Standard<br />

and acknowledge the excellent work which has<br />

been undertaken to deliver it in such short<br />

timescales. As the use of body-worn cameras<br />

proliferates, so they become more and more<br />

ingrained as an intrusive capability in the daily<br />

lives of citizens. The important and<br />

fundamental balance of preserving the rights of<br />

citizens while keeping our communities safe<br />

and secure is at the heart of the Home<br />

Secretary’s Surveillance Camera Code of<br />

Practice which, of course, I regulate. The<br />

principles within that Code are resident at the<br />

very heart of the new British Standard and I<br />

commend its introduction.”<br />

With body-worn video cameras now widely adopted by<br />

councils and police services across the UK, and in direct<br />

response to concerns over data security and privacy, a new<br />

British Standard (BS 8593:2017 Code of Practice for the<br />

Deployment and Use of Body-Worn Video) has been<br />

developed in conjunction with security and privacy groups<br />

including the Home Office, the Metropolitan Police Service<br />

and Big Brother Watch*. Brian Sims reports<br />

Legitimate deployment<br />

Examples of the legitimate deployment of bodyworn<br />

video cameras can include:<br />

• Safeguarding employee safety and security<br />

where a given end user of body-worn video may<br />

be at risk of physical or verbal attack or is<br />

otherwise working in a hazardous environment<br />

• As a deterrent if the device wearer is involved<br />

in policing or controlling an environment which<br />

people could try to disrupt<br />

• Evidence capture if the body-worn video user<br />

is involved in a role where they might witness<br />

or investigate criminal activity, and where<br />

capturing visual or audio evidence could assist<br />

with future legal proceedings<br />

• Promoting transparency where device wearers<br />

(such as bailiffs or parking wardens, for<br />

example) regularly encounter complaints<br />

• Capturing data to use in process improvement<br />

or training (identifying learning opportunities)<br />

Device recommendations such as<br />

functionality, weight, image quality and<br />

Tony Porter QPM LLB:<br />

Surveillance Camera<br />

Commissioner<br />

9<br />

www.risk-uk.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!