14.12.2012 Views

Tracking Ocean Wanders (PDF, 5 MB) - BirdLife International

Tracking Ocean Wanders (PDF, 5 MB) - BirdLife International

Tracking Ocean Wanders (PDF, 5 MB) - BirdLife International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

waters. Main foraging areas were located over the<br />

continental shelf and slope south to 55ºS. During chickrearing,<br />

albatrosses mixed two strategies, short trips over<br />

the surrounding waters in southern Chile (similar to<br />

distribution during brooding), representing up to 90% of<br />

total trips, with long trips to central Chile (similar to those<br />

made during incubation) and Antarctic waters, mainly<br />

along the continental shelf and slope of the western<br />

Antarctic Peninsula. Despite the difference in trip<br />

characteristics between breeding stages, Black-browed<br />

Albatrosses tracked from Diego Ramirez foraged mainly<br />

over Chilean territorial waters, especially inside the EEZ<br />

waters during breeding, with very occasional forays into<br />

Argentine Patagonian Shelf waters.<br />

During incubation, birds tracked from Isla Ildefonso<br />

show a similar distribution to Diego Ramirez, with<br />

concentrations occurring off the Arauco Gulf, Los Chonos<br />

Archipelago (45ºS) and southern Chile (50–57ºS). This<br />

result is similar to that between Falkland Island (Malvinas)<br />

colonies during incubation.<br />

There is a strong interaction between breeding<br />

albatrosses and fishing vessels, which produce food through<br />

offal discards and cause mortality by incidental capture<br />

(Arata and Xavier 2003, Moreno et al. 2003). Thus, it seems<br />

likely that fishing boats could affect the normal distribution<br />

patterns of Black-browed Albatrosses in southern Chile and<br />

reduce inter-colony competition by food, allowing greater<br />

than normal levels of foraging range overlap.<br />

16<br />

<strong>Tracking</strong> ocean wanderers: the global distribution of albatrosses and petrels – Results<br />

Javier Arata and Graham Robertson<br />

Figure 3.7. Utilisation<br />

distribution maps for<br />

breeding Black-browed<br />

Albatrosses tracked from Isla<br />

Diego Ramirez at different<br />

stages in the breeding cycle.<br />

A. incubating birds<br />

(n=10,103 hrs); B. early<br />

breeding (incubation/<br />

brooding) (n=1,642 hrs);<br />

C. brooding (n=5,367 hrs);<br />

D. post guard (n=6,083 hrs).<br />

(Unable to determine number<br />

of individuals of each<br />

category from dataset, so<br />

sample sizes are only given<br />

in number of hours tracked).<br />

3.1.2 Distribution of breeding birds in relation to sex<br />

Northern and Southern Giant-petrels Macronectes halli<br />

and M. giganteus – South Georgia<br />

Giant-petrels are the largest birds of the family Procellariidae,<br />

weighing about 4–5 kg and with a wingspan of 150–210 cm.<br />

Both sibling species, the Northern Macronectes halli and the<br />

Southern M. giganteus, show a noticeable sexual size<br />

dimorphism in which males are between 16 and 35% heavier<br />

and have disproportionately larger bills than females<br />

(González-Solís 2004). The two species are the dominant<br />

scavengers of the Southern <strong>Ocean</strong>; males and females of<br />

both species rely mainly on penguin and pinniped carrion,<br />

but complement this diet by taking live seabirds, scavenging<br />

on food waste and feeding on marine prey such as<br />

crustaceans, cephalopods and fish (Hunter 1985).<br />

There is much evidence, from various sources, that both<br />

species of giant-petrels are among the more remarkable<br />

examples of sexual segregation in feeding habits in birds.<br />

Direct observation of feeding habits, diet analysis and stable<br />

isotope heavy metal studies, all suggest clear segregation in<br />

the trophic habits of males and females in both species<br />

(Hunter 1983, Becker et al. 2002, González-Solís et al. 2002b,<br />

González-Solís and Croxall 2005). Such sexual differences<br />

in the type of prey consumed imply a fundamental decision<br />

to direct the searching effort to particular habitats.<br />

This is well demonstrated in the areas exploited by each<br />

sex during the incubation period. In both species most males<br />

engaged in short trips close to the breeding grounds whereas<br />

most females foraged in pelagic waters further away from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!