14.12.2012 Views

Tracking Ocean Wanders (PDF, 5 MB) - BirdLife International

Tracking Ocean Wanders (PDF, 5 MB) - BirdLife International

Tracking Ocean Wanders (PDF, 5 MB) - BirdLife International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Tracking</strong> ocean wanderers: the global distribution of albatrosses and petrels – Conclusions and future work<br />

Albatross (Figure 6.1) would considerably emphasise the<br />

importance of the Humboldt Current habitat offshore<br />

of Ecuador and Peru and portray migration routes to<br />

and from albatross concentrations at sea around the<br />

Galapagos Islands.<br />

2. For the other species, even for breeding birds, more data<br />

(and in most cases from more individuals) are needed<br />

for some stages of the breeding cycle (particularly<br />

incubation), for sexed birds and for sufficient years to<br />

assess the consistency of basic distribution patterns.<br />

Particularly, however, data are needed for additional<br />

populations (island groups) and from more colonies<br />

within populations.<br />

3. For most species data are urgently needed on the<br />

distribution of adults when not breeding.<br />

4. For almost every species data are lacking on the<br />

distribution of immatures and totally absent for early<br />

life-history stages (and the subsequent at-sea phase<br />

lasting the next 3–5 years).<br />

It could be argued that without data for all breeding cycle<br />

and life-history stages we cannot depict albatross and petrel<br />

ranges sufficiently accurately for management and<br />

conservation purposes. Nevertheless, for many applications,<br />

if the adult breeding and non-breeding distributions and<br />

core areas could be characterised this would, until adequate<br />

empirical data become available, likely provide adequate<br />

safeguards for juveniles and immatures. Completing the<br />

picture for adult birds is, therefore, potentially more<br />

important than diverting much resource into studying<br />

juveniles and immatures.<br />

Analysis and methods<br />

More work is desirable to evaluate the potential biases of<br />

using the different types (and where appropriate different<br />

duty cycling) of existing data (e.g. PTT, GLS) in different<br />

kinds of analysis and particularly on the appropriate use of<br />

spatial statistics to create density distributions from the<br />

different kinds of tracking data.<br />

Environmental data<br />

There is a priority need to facilitate easy access to<br />

appropriate data sets on the physical and biological<br />

environment at appropriate scales, including detailed<br />

bathymetry, sea surface temperature, marine productivity,<br />

sea-ice etc.<br />

6.3.2 Links to other tracking data<br />

There is a need to facilitate links to analogous sets of data<br />

on other petrels (some data are becoming available for<br />

shearwaters and fulmars), penguins (extensive data exist<br />

from the temperate and sub-Antarctic species), marine<br />

mammals (many data sets for phocid and otariid seals and<br />

increasingly for cetaceans), sea turtles (data now available<br />

for most species) and migratory fish (some data for tuna<br />

and tuna-like species becoming available).<br />

There is a need to encourage and support initiatives like<br />

the Marine Mammal <strong>Tracking</strong> Database (Annex 8) and<br />

programmes like Tagging Of Pacific Pelagics (Annex 5) which<br />

are trying to assemble similar data on a collaborative basis.<br />

6.3.3 Links to seabird-at-sea survey data<br />

Existing data are much more extensive than remotetracking<br />

data and often deal with very large numbers of<br />

sightings. However the lack of knowledge of the origin and<br />

status (breeder, migrant, non-breeder) of the birds observed<br />

reduces their utility for some purposes. Also, for deriving<br />

density-distribution maps, essential for relating to<br />

environmental features and examining relationships of<br />

interest, most data were not collected by consistent<br />

standard methods valid for producing quantitative outputs.<br />

Therefore high quality survey data tend to be rather<br />

restricted in space and time.<br />

Nevertheless there is a real need to investigate the<br />

feasibility and utility of combining remote tracking and<br />

survey data sets. Prime candidate areas for pilot studies to<br />

do this would include the north-east Pacific, tropical east<br />

Pacific, south-west Atlantic and parts of the Indian <strong>Ocean</strong>.<br />

These are all sites where substantial quantitative at-sea<br />

surveys have taken place in areas commonly frequented by<br />

remote-tracked albatrosses.<br />

6.3.4 Links to data from fisheries<br />

The highest priority investigations, involving comparing the<br />

distribution data for albatrosses and petrels and fishing<br />

effort would include:<br />

1. Identification of times and places where potential exists<br />

for adverse interactions between fisheries and<br />

albatrosses/petrels. This would enable:<br />

i. Specification of mitigation measures appropriate to<br />

these circumstances;<br />

ii. Approaches to RFMOs, singly or in combination,<br />

with appropriate jurisdictions, to seek to develop the<br />

necessary regulations to apply the mitigation<br />

measures.<br />

2. Estimation of bycatch rates of albatrosses/petrels for<br />

appropriate areas and at appropriate scales and for<br />

extrapolation to areas where bycatch data from fisheries<br />

are currently lacking.<br />

3. Assistance for modelling seabird-fishery interactions<br />

with implications for fisheries (taking financial losses<br />

through bycatch into account in cost-benefit analyses)<br />

and for seabird populations.<br />

6.3.5 IBAs and Marine Protected Areas<br />

A priority need is to relate areas of core habitat (at different<br />

levels of definition) to population estimates and threatened<br />

status in order to evaluate in detail the implications of<br />

different criteria for helping define marine IBAs (from the<br />

perspective of albatrosses and petrels). Additional, related,<br />

suggestions are made in Section 5.1.<br />

There is also a need to develop this approach further by<br />

choosing suitable systems/areas in which to link to remotetracking<br />

data on other seabirds (especially penguins) and to<br />

at-sea survey data. This is especially relevant for coastal and<br />

shelf systems (i.e. within EEZs).<br />

In the context of Marine Protected Areas, it is<br />

important to develop this further in conjunction with data<br />

on other marine taxa (e.g. marine mammals, sea turtles) and<br />

on resource use (e.g. fisheries, hydrocarbons). This is<br />

relevant both to EEZs and to high seas.<br />

6.3.6 Relationship with the Agreement for the<br />

Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels<br />

As indicated in Annex 9 the applications envisaged of these<br />

albatross and petrel data, particularly as set out above, have<br />

substantial relevance to the work of ACAP.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!