Tracking Ocean Wanders (PDF, 5 MB) - BirdLife International
Tracking Ocean Wanders (PDF, 5 MB) - BirdLife International
Tracking Ocean Wanders (PDF, 5 MB) - BirdLife International
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Tracking</strong> ocean wanderers: the global distribution of albatrosses and petrels – Conclusions and future work<br />
Albatross (Figure 6.1) would considerably emphasise the<br />
importance of the Humboldt Current habitat offshore<br />
of Ecuador and Peru and portray migration routes to<br />
and from albatross concentrations at sea around the<br />
Galapagos Islands.<br />
2. For the other species, even for breeding birds, more data<br />
(and in most cases from more individuals) are needed<br />
for some stages of the breeding cycle (particularly<br />
incubation), for sexed birds and for sufficient years to<br />
assess the consistency of basic distribution patterns.<br />
Particularly, however, data are needed for additional<br />
populations (island groups) and from more colonies<br />
within populations.<br />
3. For most species data are urgently needed on the<br />
distribution of adults when not breeding.<br />
4. For almost every species data are lacking on the<br />
distribution of immatures and totally absent for early<br />
life-history stages (and the subsequent at-sea phase<br />
lasting the next 3–5 years).<br />
It could be argued that without data for all breeding cycle<br />
and life-history stages we cannot depict albatross and petrel<br />
ranges sufficiently accurately for management and<br />
conservation purposes. Nevertheless, for many applications,<br />
if the adult breeding and non-breeding distributions and<br />
core areas could be characterised this would, until adequate<br />
empirical data become available, likely provide adequate<br />
safeguards for juveniles and immatures. Completing the<br />
picture for adult birds is, therefore, potentially more<br />
important than diverting much resource into studying<br />
juveniles and immatures.<br />
Analysis and methods<br />
More work is desirable to evaluate the potential biases of<br />
using the different types (and where appropriate different<br />
duty cycling) of existing data (e.g. PTT, GLS) in different<br />
kinds of analysis and particularly on the appropriate use of<br />
spatial statistics to create density distributions from the<br />
different kinds of tracking data.<br />
Environmental data<br />
There is a priority need to facilitate easy access to<br />
appropriate data sets on the physical and biological<br />
environment at appropriate scales, including detailed<br />
bathymetry, sea surface temperature, marine productivity,<br />
sea-ice etc.<br />
6.3.2 Links to other tracking data<br />
There is a need to facilitate links to analogous sets of data<br />
on other petrels (some data are becoming available for<br />
shearwaters and fulmars), penguins (extensive data exist<br />
from the temperate and sub-Antarctic species), marine<br />
mammals (many data sets for phocid and otariid seals and<br />
increasingly for cetaceans), sea turtles (data now available<br />
for most species) and migratory fish (some data for tuna<br />
and tuna-like species becoming available).<br />
There is a need to encourage and support initiatives like<br />
the Marine Mammal <strong>Tracking</strong> Database (Annex 8) and<br />
programmes like Tagging Of Pacific Pelagics (Annex 5) which<br />
are trying to assemble similar data on a collaborative basis.<br />
6.3.3 Links to seabird-at-sea survey data<br />
Existing data are much more extensive than remotetracking<br />
data and often deal with very large numbers of<br />
sightings. However the lack of knowledge of the origin and<br />
status (breeder, migrant, non-breeder) of the birds observed<br />
reduces their utility for some purposes. Also, for deriving<br />
density-distribution maps, essential for relating to<br />
environmental features and examining relationships of<br />
interest, most data were not collected by consistent<br />
standard methods valid for producing quantitative outputs.<br />
Therefore high quality survey data tend to be rather<br />
restricted in space and time.<br />
Nevertheless there is a real need to investigate the<br />
feasibility and utility of combining remote tracking and<br />
survey data sets. Prime candidate areas for pilot studies to<br />
do this would include the north-east Pacific, tropical east<br />
Pacific, south-west Atlantic and parts of the Indian <strong>Ocean</strong>.<br />
These are all sites where substantial quantitative at-sea<br />
surveys have taken place in areas commonly frequented by<br />
remote-tracked albatrosses.<br />
6.3.4 Links to data from fisheries<br />
The highest priority investigations, involving comparing the<br />
distribution data for albatrosses and petrels and fishing<br />
effort would include:<br />
1. Identification of times and places where potential exists<br />
for adverse interactions between fisheries and<br />
albatrosses/petrels. This would enable:<br />
i. Specification of mitigation measures appropriate to<br />
these circumstances;<br />
ii. Approaches to RFMOs, singly or in combination,<br />
with appropriate jurisdictions, to seek to develop the<br />
necessary regulations to apply the mitigation<br />
measures.<br />
2. Estimation of bycatch rates of albatrosses/petrels for<br />
appropriate areas and at appropriate scales and for<br />
extrapolation to areas where bycatch data from fisheries<br />
are currently lacking.<br />
3. Assistance for modelling seabird-fishery interactions<br />
with implications for fisheries (taking financial losses<br />
through bycatch into account in cost-benefit analyses)<br />
and for seabird populations.<br />
6.3.5 IBAs and Marine Protected Areas<br />
A priority need is to relate areas of core habitat (at different<br />
levels of definition) to population estimates and threatened<br />
status in order to evaluate in detail the implications of<br />
different criteria for helping define marine IBAs (from the<br />
perspective of albatrosses and petrels). Additional, related,<br />
suggestions are made in Section 5.1.<br />
There is also a need to develop this approach further by<br />
choosing suitable systems/areas in which to link to remotetracking<br />
data on other seabirds (especially penguins) and to<br />
at-sea survey data. This is especially relevant for coastal and<br />
shelf systems (i.e. within EEZs).<br />
In the context of Marine Protected Areas, it is<br />
important to develop this further in conjunction with data<br />
on other marine taxa (e.g. marine mammals, sea turtles) and<br />
on resource use (e.g. fisheries, hydrocarbons). This is<br />
relevant both to EEZs and to high seas.<br />
6.3.6 Relationship with the Agreement for the<br />
Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels<br />
As indicated in Annex 9 the applications envisaged of these<br />
albatross and petrel data, particularly as set out above, have<br />
substantial relevance to the work of ACAP.<br />
71