10.04.2018 Views

RCG 17 Guide to Markets FINAL[1]

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 1 | MARKET PERFORAMANCE<br />

Red 49 Performance Forecast (continued)<br />

RED 49 EXPECTED TOTAL RETURNS<br />

The weighted average five-year expected <strong>to</strong>tal return (“ETR”)<br />

of the RED 49 declined -10bps from 2Q<strong>17</strong> and 3Q<strong>17</strong> <strong>to</strong> 7.0%.<br />

Faster NOI growth projections in 4Q<strong>17</strong> are largely offset by<br />

higher terminal cap rate forecasts.<br />

The ETR estimate would be higher had RCR not changed the<br />

model it uses <strong>to</strong> project U.S. housing appreciation (FHFA Alltransactions<br />

Home Price Index). The new model employs fewer<br />

economic variables, elevating the relative effect of interest rates.<br />

Both models are nearly identical with respect <strong>to</strong> adjusted-R 2 ,<br />

standard error, Durbin-Watson statistic and Akaike information<br />

criterion, the principal statistics that we rely on <strong>to</strong> determine<br />

whether an equation is robust, reliable, unbiased and inclusive<br />

of most of the authentic economic drivers. Like the old model<br />

the new one projects a decided slowdown in appreciation over<br />

the forecast interval but, unlike the previous equation, does<br />

not produce negative growth point estimates. The old model<br />

forecast negative appreciation beginning in 2020. Logically, we<br />

consider the old model unrealistically negative in light of the<br />

weak housing supply response observed so far in this recovery/<br />

expansion phase.<br />

The impact of the new model on ETR is negative. Higher home<br />

prices contribute <strong>to</strong> reduced apartment demand and weaker<br />

rent growth, all things being equal, and thus lower ETR in the<br />

majority of markets. Although the old model contributed <strong>to</strong> an<br />

accurate rent projection for 20<strong>17</strong>, we feel the new model will be<br />

more reliable going forward.<br />

With respect <strong>to</strong> cap rates, the group inven<strong>to</strong>ry-weighted<br />

average now is expected <strong>to</strong> rise 67bps over the five-year<br />

forecast interval <strong>to</strong> 5.84% (Exhibit D). In 4Q16, the expectation<br />

was for a 50bps increase <strong>to</strong> 5.70%. The principal catalyst is the<br />

10-year Treasury rate forecast. In the earlier analysis, the 10-<br />

year yield was projected <strong>to</strong> rise 110bps over the course of the<br />

forecast interval <strong>to</strong> 3.2%. The latest iteration foresees 100bps<br />

increase from the 4Q<strong>17</strong> average rate <strong>to</strong> 3.42%.<br />

The outlook for operating fundamentals is promising, but<br />

the inflation and interest rate outlook has deteriorated.<br />

Consequently, we expect terminal cap rates <strong>to</strong> be higher<br />

than under the slow growth/low volatility conditions that we<br />

expected six months ago. This change shaves 5-year ETRs<br />

moderately, but considering the late stage of the economic and<br />

real estate cycles these are relatively good problems <strong>to</strong> have.<br />

Exhibit D. RED 49 Cap Rate His<strong>to</strong>ry and Forecast<br />

Souces: CoStar His<strong>to</strong>ries / RCR Projections<br />

4Q16 Cap Rate Forecast<br />

4Q<strong>17</strong> Cap Rate Forecast<br />

6.00%<br />

Y-o-Y Rent Growth<br />

5.75%<br />

5.25%<br />

5.25%<br />

5.20%<br />

5.<strong>17</strong>%<br />

5.70%<br />

5.84%<br />

5.00%<br />

4.75%<br />

2015 2016<br />

20<strong>17</strong> 2018f 2019f 2020f 2021f 2022f<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!