Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 1 | MARKET PERFORAMANCE<br />
Red 49 Performance Forecast (continued)<br />
RED 49 EXPECTED TOTAL RETURNS<br />
The weighted average five-year expected <strong>to</strong>tal return (“ETR”)<br />
of the RED 49 declined -10bps from 2Q<strong>17</strong> and 3Q<strong>17</strong> <strong>to</strong> 7.0%.<br />
Faster NOI growth projections in 4Q<strong>17</strong> are largely offset by<br />
higher terminal cap rate forecasts.<br />
The ETR estimate would be higher had RCR not changed the<br />
model it uses <strong>to</strong> project U.S. housing appreciation (FHFA Alltransactions<br />
Home Price Index). The new model employs fewer<br />
economic variables, elevating the relative effect of interest rates.<br />
Both models are nearly identical with respect <strong>to</strong> adjusted-R 2 ,<br />
standard error, Durbin-Watson statistic and Akaike information<br />
criterion, the principal statistics that we rely on <strong>to</strong> determine<br />
whether an equation is robust, reliable, unbiased and inclusive<br />
of most of the authentic economic drivers. Like the old model<br />
the new one projects a decided slowdown in appreciation over<br />
the forecast interval but, unlike the previous equation, does<br />
not produce negative growth point estimates. The old model<br />
forecast negative appreciation beginning in 2020. Logically, we<br />
consider the old model unrealistically negative in light of the<br />
weak housing supply response observed so far in this recovery/<br />
expansion phase.<br />
The impact of the new model on ETR is negative. Higher home<br />
prices contribute <strong>to</strong> reduced apartment demand and weaker<br />
rent growth, all things being equal, and thus lower ETR in the<br />
majority of markets. Although the old model contributed <strong>to</strong> an<br />
accurate rent projection for 20<strong>17</strong>, we feel the new model will be<br />
more reliable going forward.<br />
With respect <strong>to</strong> cap rates, the group inven<strong>to</strong>ry-weighted<br />
average now is expected <strong>to</strong> rise 67bps over the five-year<br />
forecast interval <strong>to</strong> 5.84% (Exhibit D). In 4Q16, the expectation<br />
was for a 50bps increase <strong>to</strong> 5.70%. The principal catalyst is the<br />
10-year Treasury rate forecast. In the earlier analysis, the 10-<br />
year yield was projected <strong>to</strong> rise 110bps over the course of the<br />
forecast interval <strong>to</strong> 3.2%. The latest iteration foresees 100bps<br />
increase from the 4Q<strong>17</strong> average rate <strong>to</strong> 3.42%.<br />
The outlook for operating fundamentals is promising, but<br />
the inflation and interest rate outlook has deteriorated.<br />
Consequently, we expect terminal cap rates <strong>to</strong> be higher<br />
than under the slow growth/low volatility conditions that we<br />
expected six months ago. This change shaves 5-year ETRs<br />
moderately, but considering the late stage of the economic and<br />
real estate cycles these are relatively good problems <strong>to</strong> have.<br />
Exhibit D. RED 49 Cap Rate His<strong>to</strong>ry and Forecast<br />
Souces: CoStar His<strong>to</strong>ries / RCR Projections<br />
4Q16 Cap Rate Forecast<br />
4Q<strong>17</strong> Cap Rate Forecast<br />
6.00%<br />
Y-o-Y Rent Growth<br />
5.75%<br />
5.25%<br />
5.25%<br />
5.20%<br />
5.<strong>17</strong>%<br />
5.70%<br />
5.84%<br />
5.00%<br />
4.75%<br />
2015 2016<br />
20<strong>17</strong> 2018f 2019f 2020f 2021f 2022f<br />
12