SLO LIFE Jun/Jul 2017
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5/9<br />
A group of neighbors in North San Luis Obispo banded together<br />
to file a lawsuit against the <strong>SLO</strong> City Council over its approval of<br />
the controversial 33-unit apartment building at 71 Palomar Avenue.<br />
The plan calls for removing 55 trees from the 1.3-acre property,<br />
relocating the historic Sanford House, and the opening of Luneta<br />
Drive to through traffic. The developer, Loren Riehl, an El Segundobased<br />
lawyer, has argued that there is no “legal or factual basis” for an<br />
Environmental Impact Report. Longtime permanent residents in the<br />
neighborhood—an area that is increasingly occupied by students—<br />
have expressed frustration with the city that the property had not<br />
been converted to a park. Many residents on the north end of the<br />
city, who increasingly feel they are not being represented, have begun<br />
to openly question city elections that are held “at-large” and not by<br />
district. Currently, none of San Luis Obispo’s five council members<br />
reside in the 93405 zip code.<br />
MAY ‘17<br />
5/18<br />
Two years after its permit was denied, owners of the Las Pilitas Quarry<br />
in Santa Margarita applied again with the county to move forward with<br />
the 41-acre project. The controversial plan was met with resistance from<br />
protesters concerned about the hundreds of gravel-carrying trucks that<br />
were expected to pass through downtown Santa Margarita, as well as<br />
the environmental consequences and noise that come from blasting<br />
at the site. At the time, the project was shot down by a 3-2 vote with<br />
former Supervisor Frank Mecham joining Adam Hill and Bruce Gibson<br />
(Supervisors Debbie Arnold and Lynn Compton voted “Yes”). At the<br />
time, Mecham’s replacement, John Peschong, stated that he would have<br />
voted to approve the quarry.<br />
5/11<br />
5/19<br />
<strong>SLO</strong> High special education teacher Michael Stack penned a letter Adam Hill and Bruce Gibson, who make up the progressive bloc on<br />
to the student newspaper in which he cited Bible verses claiming<br />
the <strong>SLO</strong> County Board of Supervisors, claimed that it was the “toxic<br />
that people who commit homosexual acts “deserve to die.” Students, majority” made up of conservatives Debbie Arnold, Lynn Compton,<br />
teachers, and parents immediately and sharply rebuked the letter<br />
and John Peschong, who forced out popular Chief Administrative<br />
while administrators attempted to calm their outrage, prompting<br />
Officer Dan Buckshi after his announcement that he was leaving<br />
a debate pitting First Amendment rights against the separation of<br />
to become the city manager in Walnut Creek. Buckshi was widely<br />
church and state. Stack, who said in his letter that he “didn’t want<br />
credited with leading the county unscathed through the recession<br />
to displease God” and claimed that the Bible is “without error” and while implementing reforms that led to an increase of its bond<br />
that its predictions are “100 percent accurate,” had been a firstyear<br />
probationary teacher that administrators determined back in<br />
Supervisor Adam Hill circulated an opinion piece among local media<br />
rating to AAA, the highest possible. Following the announcement,<br />
February would not be asked to return. Following the publication of that read in part, “Dan was subject to too many months of hostile,<br />
his letter, Stack failed to return to campus and instead resigned by<br />
disrespectful treatment by Supervisors Lynn Compton and Debbie<br />
email, which he also copied to Fox News. Arnold, which was abetted by Supervisor John Peschong.” <strong>SLO</strong> <strong>LIFE</strong><br />
JUN/JUL <strong>2017</strong> | <strong>SLO</strong> <strong>LIFE</strong> MAGAZINE | 31