La Red de Alta Velocidad Europea: Más un mosaico poco efectivo que una realidad

More documents

Recommendations

Info

61 Recommendation 2 – EU co-funding support for high-speed rail infrastructure investments The Commission should : 1. Revise the TEN-T regulation to enable it to enforce the timely implementation of the key strategic infrastructure networks identified above. Target implementation date: initiate the work as soon as possible to ensure work is completed by 2023. 2. Upon revision of the TEN-T Regulation earmark the EU co-funding support for these strategic priority projects. Target implementation date: immediately after the revision of the TEN-T Regulation. 3.During the programming of cohesion policy, together with the Member States, focus its funding for high-speed rail lines to those high-speed rail lines that form part of the core network corridors. Target implementation date: when preparing the programmes for the post-2020 period. 4. Make EU co-funding contingent on the introduction of an effective on-track competition on the supported high-speed lines soonest after completion of the works. Target implementation date: immediately. 5. Link EU co-funding to beneficiaries not only to the delivery of outputs but also to the achievement of results announced. To achieve this, it should ensure the introduction of the principle of paying a fixed percentage of the EU co-funding granted to the beneficiary as a performance bonus, if it can be evidenced, from an ex-post evaluation, that the anticipated results have been exceeded. Such bonus should come from a performance reserve, similar to what currently exists in the Cohesion policy framework. Target implementation date: when preparing the new legislative proposals for the post- 2020 period.
62 6. In the upcoming CEF Regulation, together with the Member States, agree stronger enforcement tools to speed up the completion of the current obligations deriving from the TEN-T regulation. Such enforcement tools should also tackle the situation where a Member State does not propose to timely advance on key projects in view of fulfilling the commitments taken for the completion of the core network projects. Target implementation date: when preparing the new legislative proposals on CEF for the post-2020 period. Recommendation 3 - Simplifying cross-border constructions To simplify current and future major cross-border investments in high-speed rail infrastructure, the Commission should: 1. Review the rules on procurement, to have the option of a single legal framework for key cross-border infrastructure projects. This includes issues such as the language of the tendering documents, contracts and accounting systems of management bodies implementing the projects, and procedures for the settling of disputes. 2. Create, or facilitate the creation of, “one-stop shops”, which are single bodies streamlining the various formalities to be complied with on both sides of the border. 3. Accelerate the lifting of all administrative and regulatory barriers to interoperability. Target implementation date: by mid-2019.
Page 1 and 2:
EN 2018 NO 19 Special Report A Euro
Page 3 and 4:
2 CONTENTS Paragraph Abbreviations
Page 5 and 6:
4 Annex I - European High-Speed Net
Page 7 and 8:
6 ERTMS (European Rail traffic mana
Page 9 and 10:
8 V. The quality of the assessment
Page 11 and 12: 10 (ii) making EU co-funding suppor
Page 13 and 14: 12 all planned high-speed rail infr
Page 15 and 16: 14 Member States, to remove bottlen
Page 17 and 18: 16 13. Although these sums are sign
Page 19 and 20: 18 Figure 4 - Overview of audited l
Page 21 and 22: 20 22. Although the relationship is
Page 23 and 24: 22 two or more Member States, as th
Page 25 and 26: 24 30. This limits the EU added val
Page 27 and 28: 26 Picture 1 - Missing link at the
Page 29 and 30: 28 Decision-making lacks reliable c
Page 31 and 32: 30 Figure 5 - Differences in constr
Page 33 and 34: 32 Table 4 - Cost of the audited hi
Page 35 and 36: 34 unrealistic. This was not questi
Page 37 and 38: 36 Picture 2 - Construction works o
Page 39 and 40: 38 speed rail. However, when assess
Page 41 and 42: 40 (iv) From Paris to Strasbourg, t
Page 43 and 44: 42 16 km/h 37 . The number of stati
Page 45 and 46: 44 74. To be successful and competi
Page 47 and 48: 46 be successful 43 . In 2016, only
Page 49 and 50: 48 Box 2 - The operations of the Sh
Page 51 and 52: 50 Seamless and competitive cross-b
Page 53 and 54: 52 Picture 5 - Passengers waiting a
Page 55 and 56: 54 90. Directive (EU) No 2012/34/EU
Page 57 and 58: 56 A strong and independent regulat
Page 59 and 60: 58 The principles of sound financia
Page 61: 60 106. Each Member State must have
Page 65 and 66: 64 ANNEX I European High-Speed Netw
Page 68: 66 Country HSL Project Code Project
Page 72: 68 ANNEX IV Key HSR Data per Member
Page 76 and 77: 70 ANNEX VI A citizen’s view: Ass
Page 78 and 79: 72 given to the fastest and slightl
Page 81: 74 Averages by visited country Euro
Page 85 and 86: 76 ANNEX VIII Map of the catchment
Page 87 and 88: High-Speed Line Eje Atlantico 78
Page 89 and 90: 80 High-Speed Line Est Européenne
Page 91 and 92: 82 High-Speed Line Torino - Salerno
Page 93 and 94: High-Speed Line Berlin - Munich 84
Page 95 and 96: 86 High-Speed Line Madrid - Lisbon
Page 97 and 98: 88 High-Speed Line Figueres - Perpi
Page 99: 90 Analysis of stations ANNEX IX Co
Page 102 and 103: XI. The Commission refers to its re
Page 104 and 105: calculation of the socio-economic v
Page 106 and 107: depend on the size of the country a
Page 108 and 109: As regards CEF, the Commission does
Page 110 and 111: operators, the Commission has recen
Page 112 and 113:
Since 2000, the EU has been investi
Page 114 and 115:
ES los auditores, una velocidad med
show all

La Red de Alta Velocidad Europea: Más un mosaico poco efectivo que una realidad

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?