16.12.2012 Views

Commission Work Session Agenda Memo - City of Hays, KS

Commission Work Session Agenda Memo - City of Hays, KS

Commission Work Session Agenda Memo - City of Hays, KS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Memo</strong><br />

To: <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />

From: Toby Dougherty, <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

Date: 10-1-12<br />

Re: October 4, 2012 <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong><br />

Please find the attached agenda and supporting documentation for the October 4, 2012 <strong>Work</strong><br />

<strong>Session</strong>.<br />

Item 2 – Update on Larks Park Turf<br />

At the June 28, 2012 regular meeting, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> was asked to cost-share with Fort<br />

<strong>Hays</strong> State University for the replacement <strong>of</strong> turf at Larks Park. The <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> voted to<br />

split the cost with Fort <strong>Hays</strong> State University with the <strong>City</strong> contribution not to exceed $150,000.<br />

The only request that the <strong>Commission</strong>ers had at that time was that they be aware <strong>of</strong> the final<br />

design selection before the turf is installed. The University is receiving bids on October 1, 2012,<br />

and Fort <strong>Hays</strong> State University Director <strong>of</strong> Athletics Curtis Hammeke will be at the work session<br />

on Thursday to inform the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>of</strong> which company the University intends to select and<br />

to give examples <strong>of</strong> what the final design will look like. No further action is required by the <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong>. This item is informational only.<br />

Item 3 – Golden Belt 8 th Addition Replat (Lot 2, Block 9)<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong><br />

Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

Please refer to the attached information from Planning, Inspection and Enforcement<br />

Superintendent Jesse Rohr regarding the Replat <strong>of</strong> Golden Belt 8 th Addition. This is an area that<br />

has been vacant for many years. The property recently changed hands, and it is the property<br />

owner’s intention to put in high-density housing. The Replat has been vetted through the Planning<br />

<strong>Commission</strong> with a unanimous recommendation to approve.<br />

Item 4 – Pre-annexation Agreement for Sanitary Sewer Service – 2807 Highway 183 Alternate<br />

Property<br />

This is a housekeeping item. The property at 2807 Highway 183 Alternate is requesting to hook<br />

up to the <strong>City</strong>’s sanitary sewer service. Before we authorize that hookup, a pre-annexation<br />

agreement is required.


Item 5 – Vacate <strong>of</strong> Alley in Reservation Addition<br />

The owner <strong>of</strong> a parcel in Reservation Addition is asking the <strong>City</strong> to vacate an alley to<br />

accommodate a business expansion. <strong>City</strong> staff sees no issues with this request.<br />

Item 6 – Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Development Corporation (DHDC) Pavilion Operating Costs<br />

Please refer to the brief memorandum from Assistant <strong>City</strong> Manager Paul Briseno. The <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong> was asked by DHDC to cost-share in creating a pavilion in the downtown area. At<br />

that meeting, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> had questions in regard to further operating costs that would<br />

be incurred by the <strong>City</strong> once the pavilion was built. Parks Director Jeff Boyle and Assistant <strong>City</strong><br />

Manager Paul Briseno have answered those questions.<br />

aw


CITY OF HAYS<br />

CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION<br />

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2012 – 6:30 P.M.<br />

AGENDA<br />

1. ITEM FOR REVIEW: September 20, 2012 <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong> Notes (PAGE 1)<br />

DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE: Kim Rupp, Director <strong>of</strong> Finance<br />

2. ITEM FOR REVIEW: FHSU Update on Larks Park Turf<br />

PERSON RESPONSIBLE: Curtis Hammeke, FHSU Director <strong>of</strong> Athletics<br />

3. ITEM FOR REVIEW: Golden Belt 8 th Addition Replat (Lot 2, Block 9) (PAGE 5)<br />

DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE: I.D. Creech, Director <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Work</strong>s<br />

4. ITEM FOR REVIEW: Pre-annexation Agreement for Sanitary Sewer Service –<br />

2807 Highway 183 Alternate Property (PAGE 13)<br />

DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE: I.D. Creech, Director <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Work</strong>s<br />

5. ITEM FOR REVIEW: Vacate <strong>of</strong> Alley in Reservation Addition (PAGE 23)<br />

DEPARTMENT HEAD RESPONSIBLE: I.D. Creech, Director <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Work</strong>s<br />

6. ITEM FOR REVIEW: Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Development Corporation (DHDC) Pavilion<br />

Operating Costs (PAGE 29)<br />

PERSON RESPONSIBLE: Toby Dougherty, <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

7. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION<br />

8. EXECUTIVE SESSION (IF REQUIRED)<br />

9. ADJOURNMENT<br />

ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY NEEDING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS TO ATTEND THIS MEETING<br />

SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED MEETING<br />

TIME. EVERY ATTEMPT WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE ANY REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE.


<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong><br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong> Notes<br />

September 20, 2012<br />

Present: Troy Hickman, Kent Steward, Henry Schwaller IV, Ron Mellick, Barbara<br />

Wasinger, John Bird, Toby Dougherty<br />

Downtown Pavilion Presentation & Strategic Plan<br />

Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Development Corporation (DHDC) executive director<br />

Traci Konrade appeared before the <strong>Commission</strong> to present the recently<br />

completed DHDC Strategic Plan. Part <strong>of</strong> the Plan is to develop a pavilion in<br />

downtown <strong>Hays</strong>. Michelle Flax, president <strong>of</strong> the DHDC, gave a Power Point<br />

presentation <strong>of</strong> the proposed pavilion. The pavilion can be used for a farmer’s<br />

market, family reunions, and a variety <strong>of</strong> other events. The proposed site is<br />

along the railroad corridor on 10 th Street between the grain elevators and Union<br />

Pacific Park.<br />

Ms. Flax stated that a major contributor has <strong>of</strong>fered to donate a substantial<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> money to the project if the <strong>City</strong> supports this project with a cash<br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> $100,000 and in-kind labor. The project is estimated to cost<br />

$600,000. DHDC would like the <strong>City</strong> to manage the building once it is complete,<br />

<strong>City</strong> staff will provide estimated annual costs for maintenance and upkeep<br />

<strong>of</strong> the building at the October 11, 2012 work session.<br />

<strong>Hays</strong> Housing Assessment<br />

Aaron White, executive director <strong>of</strong> the Ellis County Coalition for Economic<br />

Development (ECCED), presented the findings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Hays</strong> Housing<br />

Assessment. The <strong>Hays</strong> Realtors Association and ECCED contracted with RDG<br />

Planning & Design to perform a housing needs assessment.<br />

The assessment identified groups that exhibit the greatest need for<br />

housing in <strong>Hays</strong>. The top three groups are:<br />

1


� Young families with children<br />

� Low or moderate income households<br />

� First-time home buyers<br />

Errol Wuertz, representing the <strong>Hays</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Realtors, discussed housing<br />

conditions and zoning regulations with the <strong>Commission</strong>ers.<br />

<strong>City</strong> Manager Toby Dougherty stated there a lot <strong>of</strong> strategies that can be<br />

used to alleviate the housing problem. Zoning regulations could be changed to<br />

encourage additions to single-family homes. Policy discussion needs to be<br />

vetted through the Planning <strong>Commission</strong>. In conjunction with the<br />

Comprehensive Plan, RDG presented a list <strong>of</strong> barriers that hinder development<br />

and growth. Removal <strong>of</strong> those barriers is the next step. It may be necessary to<br />

do some strategic planning and try some other methods going forward.<br />

Market <strong>Hays</strong> Plan<br />

Jana Jordan, director <strong>of</strong> the Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB), reported<br />

on a marketing plan for the city <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>. In January 2012, the CVB contacted<br />

Jake Huyett with Jones, Huyett Partners in Topeka to assist in creating a solid<br />

marketing plan for <strong>Hays</strong>. After visiting <strong>Hays</strong>, he met with CVB staff, fellow<br />

economic development partners, and local tourism personnel to discuss the best<br />

opportunities for marketing <strong>Hays</strong> and Ellis County. A Market <strong>Hays</strong> Action Plan<br />

was developed which promotes the <strong>City</strong>’s assets and points out areas where the<br />

<strong>City</strong> has fallen short and needs to take corrective action.<br />

Ordinance Requiring Two (2) Forms <strong>of</strong> Identification to Enter Drinking<br />

Establishments<br />

<strong>Commission</strong>er Schwaller requested discussion on this subject.<br />

In 1991, Ordinance No. 3239 was adopted, with a section <strong>of</strong> that<br />

ordinance requiring two forms <strong>of</strong> identification to enter certain drinking<br />

establishments. Ordinance No. 3493, adopted in 2001, further defined what two<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> identification would be required. This requirement was the result <strong>of</strong><br />

2


much negotiation between the <strong>City</strong> and bar owners. Bar owners wanted to allow<br />

person under 21 in drinking establishments and in return, agreed to a heightened<br />

level <strong>of</strong> identification to address concerns by law enforcement and other<br />

interested parties that underage drinking would be allowed if under-21 individuals<br />

were admitted. There is no state statute requiring two forms <strong>of</strong> identification to<br />

enter a drinking establishment. Staff checked with Salina, Manhattan, Lawrence,<br />

Emporia and Topeka, none <strong>of</strong> which required two forms <strong>of</strong> identification.<br />

<strong>Commission</strong>er Schwaller stated that bar owners have access to<br />

technology that can tell whether an ID is fake or not. This technology was not<br />

available 20 years ago. He requested the <strong>Commission</strong> consider an ordinance<br />

requiring only one form <strong>of</strong> identification to enter a bar.<br />

Police Chief Don Scheibler stated that the Police Department has written<br />

nine (9) violations for this <strong>of</strong>fense since 2007; it is not a major problem. There is<br />

some underage drinking in bars. For the most part, with the punishment the state<br />

dishes out, it is in the best interest <strong>of</strong> the bar owners to police underage drinking<br />

on their own. The Police Chief added that the majority <strong>of</strong> the ID’s are not fake,<br />

but belong to someone else.<br />

Staff was directed to do further research. The matter will be discussed at<br />

a future work session.<br />

Condemnation <strong>of</strong> Sidewalks<br />

In June <strong>of</strong> 2012, <strong>City</strong> staff inspected sidewalks for adequacy and safety.<br />

Letters were mailed to forty (40) property owners identifying the need to make<br />

repairs to sidewalks on their property. The letters contained information on the<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> Sidewalk Assistance Program, which provides financial assistance<br />

for sidewalk repairs. Of the 40 properties, 20 have completed repairs and 11<br />

have either been issued a permit or hired a contractor to make repairs. Nine<br />

have made no attempt to make repairs as <strong>of</strong> this point in time.<br />

Public <strong>Work</strong>s Director I. D. Creech stated the 1 st phase <strong>of</strong> this program<br />

was implemented in the neighborhood area around Fort <strong>Hays</strong> State University.<br />

Other areas <strong>of</strong> town will be addressed during the next few years. <strong>City</strong> Code<br />

3


allows the Governing Body to determine, by resolution, that a sidewalk is<br />

inadequate or unsafe and order the construction <strong>of</strong> a new sidewalk. The owner<br />

would then have to repair the sidewalk within 30-60 days after the resolution is<br />

published. If the sidewalks are not repaired, the <strong>City</strong> Manager can authorize the<br />

repairs and have the associated costs assessed to the property owner by means<br />

<strong>of</strong> special assessment. The Public <strong>Work</strong>s Director estimated the cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />

repairs to the nine properties to be under $10,000.<br />

Staff will present a draft resolution for the <strong>Commission</strong>’s consideration at a<br />

future work session.<br />

Other Items for Discussion<br />

<strong>City</strong> Manager Toby Dougherty informed the <strong>Commission</strong>ers that in order<br />

for the <strong>City</strong> to pull out <strong>of</strong> Public Wholesale Water District #15 it will be necessary<br />

to pass an ordinance. PWWD#15 could still exist; it has no assets, no cash, no<br />

land, it only has a board <strong>of</strong> directors. This would not dissolve the District, just<br />

withdraw from the District.<br />

The work session adjourned at 8:28 p.m.<br />

Submitted by:_________________________________________<br />

Doris Wing – <strong>City</strong> Clerk<br />

4


<strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />

<strong>Memo</strong><br />

From: Jesse Rohr, PIE Superintendent<br />

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong>: October 4, 2012<br />

Subject: Golden Belt 8 th Addition Replat (Lot 2, Block 9)<br />

Person(s) Toby Dougherty, <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

Responsible: I.D. Creech, Director <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Work</strong>s<br />

Summary<br />

The owner <strong>of</strong> Lot 2, Block 9 <strong>of</strong> the Golden Belt 8 th Addition has submitted a replat <strong>of</strong> the<br />

property for consideration. The proposed plat will contain 24 residential lots, and is<br />

consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Future Development Map while also<br />

complying with the <strong>City</strong>’s Subdivision and Zoning regulations. Staff, as well as the<br />

Planning <strong>Commission</strong>, recommends approval <strong>of</strong> the final plat as submitted.<br />

Background<br />

This property was originally platted in 1983. It was platted as one lot (440’ x 450’) and is now<br />

being split into residential sized lots. The original intention for this lot was for commercial<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the area. However, as the land around developed, it became primarily<br />

residential, with a large portion <strong>of</strong> it being two-family or multi-family dwellings.<br />

Discussion<br />

The owner <strong>of</strong> Lot 2, Block 9 <strong>of</strong> the Golden Belt 8 th Addition has submitted a replat <strong>of</strong> the<br />

property for consideration. The plat contains 24 residential lots. There is a 30’ wide<br />

platted access/utility easement running north/south through the middle <strong>of</strong> the property.<br />

This will provide access to the interior lots within the block and will remain a private<br />

drive similar to some other recent in-fill developments in <strong>Hays</strong> over the past couple <strong>of</strong><br />

years. While the developer did consider a 60’ wide dedicated right-<strong>of</strong>-way, the size <strong>of</strong><br />

the block was just not accommodating to such a wide right-<strong>of</strong>-way. Several<br />

configurations were looked at before this one was settled on.<br />

There are some utilities required as development occurs. The developer will be required<br />

to establish the proper sanitary sewer, water, and storm water utilities necessary for the<br />

development. It is unknown at this time if the developer will special asses the costs or<br />

will pay for them up front in full. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat which has also<br />

been reviewed by the Utility Advisory Committee. All proper easements are in place.<br />

5


On August 20, 2012 the final plat was reviewed and approved (6-0 vote) by the <strong>Hays</strong><br />

Area Planning <strong>Commission</strong>. All parties recommend approval <strong>of</strong> the submitted plat.<br />

Legal Consideration<br />

There are no known legal obstacles to the proposed action.<br />

Financial Consideration<br />

This action has no immediate financial effect, unless during the construction phase over-sizing<br />

<strong>of</strong> infrastructure (water and sanitary sewer) is required, in which case the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> will<br />

pay for the over-sizing per the current Development Policy. Upon initial review, it is unlikely<br />

any oversizing will be necessary.<br />

Options include the following:<br />

� Approve the plat as submitted<br />

� Recommend changes to the plat<br />

� Do not approve the plat<br />

Options<br />

Recommendation<br />

Staff, as well as the Planning <strong>Commission</strong>, recommends approving this plat as submitted.<br />

Action Requested<br />

Approve the resolution accepting the final plat known as the Replat <strong>of</strong> Lot 2, Block 9,<br />

Golden Belt 8 th Addition.<br />

Final Plat<br />

Planning <strong>Commission</strong> Minutes<br />

Resolution<br />

Supporting Documentation<br />

P:\<strong>Agenda</strong> Materials\2012\10-04-12\Golden Belt 8th Add. Final Plat memo 1.1.doc<br />

6


DRAFT MINUTES<br />

HAYS AREA PLANNING COMMISSION<br />

CITY HALL IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS<br />

AUGUST 20, 2012<br />

MINUTES<br />

6:30 P.M.<br />

1. CALL TO ORDER: The <strong>Hays</strong> Area Planning <strong>Commission</strong> met in regular<br />

session Monday, August 20, 2012 at 6:30 p.m. in <strong>Commission</strong> Chambers at <strong>City</strong> Hall.<br />

The meeting was called to order by Chairman Larry Gould.<br />

Present: Larry Gould Paul Phillips Jake Glover<br />

Jim Fouts Pam Rein Emery Jennings<br />

Absent: Tom Denning Lou Caplan Terry Claycamp<br />

<strong>City</strong> Staff: Jesse Rohr, Superintendent <strong>of</strong> Planning, Inspection and Enforcement<br />

and Administrative Secretary Linda K. Bixenman.<br />

2. MINUTES: The minutes from the July 16, 2012 meeting were approved by<br />

consensus.<br />

3. CITIZEN COMMENTS: - None.<br />

4. CITY/COUNTY COMMISSION ACTION & PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ISSUE<br />

UPDATES: Jesse Rohr presented the updates.<br />

6. CONSIDER FINAL PLAT OF REPLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 9, GOLDEN BELT 8 TH ADDITION:<br />

Jesse Rohr showed the location <strong>of</strong> the above property on the overhead.<br />

Harvey Ruder, engineer, presented the application request on behalf <strong>of</strong> the owner<br />

Laverne Schumacher, to consider the final plat <strong>of</strong> the above. The proposed<br />

development would be for two-family dwelling units. It is currently zoned “C-O”<br />

Central Business and Office District.<br />

The replat <strong>of</strong> lot 2 would consist <strong>of</strong> 24 residential lots north <strong>of</strong> the Oak Park Medical<br />

Center with a 30 foot access and utility easement through the middle. There<br />

would be a 24 foot paved private street in the middle with water and sewer<br />

addition. There is an ample turning radius at the end <strong>of</strong> the access (Judith Drive)<br />

approved by the fire department. This layout <strong>of</strong> the plat would be comparable to<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> the area where the duplexes were built at 13 th and<br />

Canterbury and the Paul-Wertenberger Development near the Country Club area.<br />

The plans for the development are for two-family dwelling units. Paul Phillips asked<br />

if the east lots face Harvest Road, and the far west lots face Anthony Dr and the<br />

1<br />

7


interior lots face Judith Drive. He asked if the utilities would come in from 17 th<br />

Street. It was answered that was correct.<br />

Jesse Rohr stated that the Utility Advisory Committee has no opposition to the<br />

replat.<br />

Larry Gould asked if it had come up for discussion by the <strong>City</strong> for having the alleys<br />

to maintain; he thought the <strong>City</strong> discouraged alleys because <strong>of</strong> the additional<br />

maintenance. Jesse Rohr answered that alleys are an option in the development<br />

policy; although it has not been seen in several years. Due to the increase in<br />

development costs, the developer has retained the extra 20 feet for the lots.<br />

Jack Glover asked if the lots back up against each other. It was answered that<br />

they would back up against each other. He asked if there was ample green<br />

space. Jesse Rohr answered that there was a park (Kiwanis Park) and a drainage<br />

dedication not for development nearby.<br />

Emery Jennings asked if there was water drainage on one corner. Jesse Rohr<br />

answered that the development would have to meet the stormwater<br />

requirements.<br />

Jim Fouts asked if the Oak Park Medical Center were aware <strong>of</strong> this potential<br />

development. The center was designed to add two legs to the complex when<br />

needed. Jesse Rohr answered that the Oak Park Medical Center had sold <strong>of</strong>f<br />

their ownership <strong>of</strong> the parcel <strong>of</strong> land to the north.<br />

Paul Phillips asked what process they plan to take since the property is zoned “C-<br />

O” and the proposed zoning is “R-3” Two Family Dwelling District. Jesse Rohr<br />

answered they can either go before the <strong>Hays</strong> Area Board <strong>of</strong> Zoning to request a<br />

special use permit for two-family dwellings or they can go through the rezoning<br />

process or it could develop as commercial as it stands.<br />

Jesse Rohr noted that the current zoning on adjacent properties were two-family<br />

dwelling units to the west, single family to the north and east and commercial to<br />

the south. This is ideal for a mixed use area.<br />

Larry Gould entertained a motion.<br />

There was a motion by Pam Rein and a second by Paul Phillips for their<br />

recommendation to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> to approve the final plat <strong>of</strong> replat <strong>of</strong> Lot<br />

2, Block 9, Golden Belt 8 th Addition.<br />

Motion: AYES: Larry Gould Paul Phillips Jake Glover<br />

Jim Fouts Pam Rein Emery Jennings<br />

2<br />

8


RESOLUTION<br />

GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, TO THE PUBLIC:<br />

WHEREAS, Laverne Schumacher, an individual, has presented to the<br />

Governing Body <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas, a certain replat <strong>of</strong> LOT 2, BLOCK 9,<br />

GOLDEN BELT 8 TH ADDITION situated within the corporate limits <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas, being lots and streets comprising the following described real<br />

estate, to-wit:<br />

LOT 2, OF BLOCK 9, OF THE GOLDEN BELT 8 TH ADDITION TO<br />

THE CITY OF HAYS, ELLIS COUNTY, KANSAS;<br />

to be known as REPLAT OF LOT 2 BLOCK 9 GOLDEN BELT 8 TH ADDITION to<br />

the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas; and,<br />

WHEREAS, the said plat has been examined and considered by the <strong>Hays</strong><br />

Area Planning <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas; and,<br />

WHEREAS, the <strong>City</strong> Attorney <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas, has found that<br />

the proposed plat conforms to the requirements <strong>of</strong> the statutes in such matters<br />

made and provided;<br />

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY<br />

OF THE CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, that the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas, hereby<br />

approves the replat <strong>of</strong> LOT 2 BLOCK 9 GOLDEN BELT 8 TH ADDITION to the<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas, and the <strong>City</strong> Clerk is instructed to endorse such approval<br />

on said plat.<br />

Passed and adopted by the Governing Body <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas,<br />

this 11 th day <strong>of</strong> October, 2012.<br />

ATTEST:<br />

BY_____________________________<br />

Doris Wing - <strong>City</strong> Clerk<br />

9<br />

_______________________________<br />

Troy Hickman - Mayor


Golden Belt 8th<br />

11


<strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />

<strong>Memo</strong><br />

From: Jesse Rohr, PIE Superintendent<br />

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong>: October 4, 2012<br />

Subject: Pre-annexation Agreement for Sanitary Sewer Service<br />

for 2807 Hwy 183 Alt.<br />

Person(s) Toby Dougherty, <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

Responsible: I.D. Creech, Director <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Work</strong>s<br />

Summary<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> Development Policy allows connection to one or both utilities (water or<br />

sanitary sewer) when the subject property lies outside the <strong>City</strong> Limits, as long as the<br />

parties involved first agree to a pre-annexation agreement. The owner <strong>of</strong> 2807 Hwy 183<br />

Alt. (map attached) has requested a sanitary sewer connection for an existing commercial<br />

structure on the property. The owner has agreed to the terms <strong>of</strong> the standard preannexation<br />

agreement. If approved, the owner will pay the current outside rate <strong>of</strong> $36.10<br />

per month for sanitary sewer service, or will have their well water metered for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> establishing the monthly sewer rate. Staff, including Public <strong>Work</strong>s and<br />

Utilities, recommends approving the agreement allowing the property owner to connect<br />

to <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> sanitary sewer.<br />

Background<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> Development Policy allows connection to one or both utilities (water or<br />

sanitary sewer) when the subject property lies outside the <strong>City</strong> Limits, as long as the parties<br />

involved first agree to a pre-annexation agreement.<br />

Discussion<br />

The owner <strong>of</strong> 2807 Hwy 183 Alt. has requested a sanitary sewer connection for an existing<br />

commercial structure on the property. The <strong>City</strong> sewer main does lie along the east side <strong>of</strong><br />

HWY 183 Alt., making it available for connection. There is currently a septic system on the<br />

property, however Ellis Co. environmental regulations restrict the use <strong>of</strong> septic systems when<br />

a public sewer is readily available. Also, a minimum <strong>of</strong> 2 acres is required for a septic system,<br />

and the subject property is only comprised <strong>of</strong> 1.1 acres. The existing septic system is<br />

essentially “grandfathered”. The new owners <strong>of</strong> the property have consulted with Dale Wing<br />

from the Ellis Co. Environmental Office and he strongly recommended to them to pursue<br />

connection to the public sewer system. The owners have agreed to the terms <strong>of</strong> the standard<br />

13


pre-annexation agreement as detailed on Pg. 14 <strong>of</strong> the Development Policy Infrastructure<br />

Guidelines for New Development, last revised October 8, 2009. (See excerpt below)<br />

14) Annexation:<br />

a. An individual or business located outside the city limits may submit a written<br />

application to the Planning, Inspection, Enforcement Superintendent asking for<br />

permission to connect a legally recorded lot or tract to a sanitary sewer line or water<br />

main.<br />

b. The requesting individual or business must file a Petition for Annexation or agree<br />

to enter into a Pre-annexation Agreement, which either annexes the property to be<br />

served with sanitary sewer and/or water service immediately or provides for the point<br />

in time when annexation will take place. The Petition for Annexation or Preannexation<br />

Agreement must be approved by the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>.<br />

Once a property is connected to both public water and sewer services and/or<br />

property is contiguous with the <strong>City</strong> Limit on at least 3 sides, the <strong>City</strong> will consider<br />

annexing the property.<br />

c. The requesting individual or business must agree to comply with all zoning<br />

regulations, subdivision regulations and building codes, building permits, building<br />

inspections, and building and inspection fees now in force or as may be amended in<br />

the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> for all improvements commenced after annexation or adoption <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Pre-annexation Agreement.<br />

d. The requesting individual or business must agree to participate in any Special<br />

Assessment District, which might be formed for the purpose <strong>of</strong> paving roads/street,<br />

and or extending public water mains or sanitary sewer lines to the property.<br />

e. The above conditions, as well as any conditions, which might be imposed by the<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> at the time <strong>of</strong> application, shall apply to subsequent owners <strong>of</strong> the<br />

property for which the request is being made.<br />

f. Water and sewer service charges, as provided through ordinance and as amended<br />

from time to time, shall be assessed against properties, that connect to the public<br />

utility infrastructure.<br />

g. A non-refundable fee <strong>of</strong> $200.00 shall be collected for the purpose <strong>of</strong> administrating<br />

each application for connection.<br />

Legal Consideration<br />

There are no known legal obstacles to proceeding as recommended by <strong>City</strong> Staff.<br />

Financial Consideration<br />

If approved, the owner will pay the current outside rate <strong>of</strong> $36.10 per month for sanitary<br />

sewer service or will have their well water metered for the purpose <strong>of</strong> establishing the<br />

monthly sewer rate.<br />

14


Options<br />

Options include the following:<br />

� Approve the pre-annexation agreement and allow the property owner to connect<br />

to the <strong>City</strong> sanitary sewer service.<br />

� Do not approve the agreement therefore not allowing the property owner to<br />

connect to <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> sanitary sewer service.<br />

Recommendation<br />

Staff, including Public <strong>Work</strong>s and Utilities, recommends approving the agreement<br />

allowing the property owner to connect to <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> sanitary sewer.<br />

Action Requested<br />

Approve the pre-annexation agreement which would allow the owners <strong>of</strong> 2807 Hwy 183<br />

Alt. to connect one commercial structure to the <strong>City</strong> sanitary sewer system.<br />

Utilities <strong>Memo</strong><br />

Owner Request<br />

Location Map<br />

Pre-Annexation Agreement<br />

Supporting Documentation<br />

P:\<strong>Agenda</strong> Materials\2012\10-04-12\2807 Hwy 183 Alt. Pre-annexation Agreement memo 1.1.doc<br />

15


PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND PROVISION FOR CITY<br />

SANITARY SEWER SERVICE<br />

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 11 th day <strong>of</strong> October 2012, by<br />

and between the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Ellis County, Kansas, a duly organized municipal<br />

corporation hereinafter referred to as “FIRST PARTY”, and Brandon and Julie<br />

Weidenhaft, hereinafter referred to as “SECOND PARTY”.<br />

WHEREAS, Second Party is the owner <strong>of</strong> a tract <strong>of</strong> land described as follows,<br />

to-wit:<br />

A tract <strong>of</strong> land situated in the Southeast Quarter (SE/4) <strong>of</strong> Section 30, Township 13<br />

South, Range 18 West <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Principal Meridian in Ellis County, Kansas, also<br />

known as 2807 HWY 183 Alternate, and more particularly described as follows:<br />

Commencing at the Northeast corner <strong>of</strong> the Southeast Quarter (SE/4) <strong>of</strong> Section 30,<br />

Township 13 South, Range 18 West; THENCE on an assumed bearing <strong>of</strong> S 1° 44' 08'' E<br />

along the East line <strong>of</strong> said Section 30, a distance <strong>of</strong> 1,667.00 feet; THENCE on a bearing<br />

<strong>of</strong> S 87° 37' 51” W parallel with the North line <strong>of</strong> the Southeast Quarter (SE/4) <strong>of</strong> said<br />

Section 30 a distance <strong>of</strong> 20.00 feet; THENCE on a bearing <strong>of</strong> N 62° 01' 11" W a distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> 69.78 feet to the West right-<strong>of</strong>-way line <strong>of</strong> U.S. Highway 183 Alternate and the point<br />

<strong>of</strong> beginning; THENCE continuing on the last described course a distance <strong>of</strong> 309.42 feet;<br />

THENCE on a bearing <strong>of</strong> N 1° 44' 08" W parallel with the East line <strong>of</strong> said Section 30, a<br />

distance <strong>of</strong> 59.57 feet; THENCE on a bearing <strong>of</strong> N 88° 15' 52" E a distance <strong>of</strong> 329.33 feet<br />

to the West right-<strong>of</strong>-way line; THENCE on a bearing <strong>of</strong> S 1° 44' 08" E parallel with the<br />

East line <strong>of</strong> said Section 30 and along the West right-<strong>of</strong>-way line a distance <strong>of</strong> 88.00 feet;<br />

THENCE on a bearing <strong>of</strong> S 87° 36' 08" W a distance <strong>of</strong> 23.69 feet along the West right<strong>of</strong>-way<br />

line <strong>of</strong> said U.S. Highway 183 Alternate; THENCE on a bearing <strong>of</strong> S 14° 45' 36"<br />

W along the right-<strong>of</strong>-way line a distance <strong>of</strong> 130.03 feet to the point <strong>of</strong> beginning;<br />

THEREFORE, the parties agree that in consideration <strong>of</strong> the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

connection <strong>of</strong> the above described tract <strong>of</strong> land to the existing system for the providing <strong>of</strong><br />

sanitary sewer service by the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, and the following agreements and promises<br />

made by Second Party, it is agreed as follows:<br />

1. Second Party, as the owner <strong>of</strong> record <strong>of</strong> the area above described, hereby<br />

petitions the Governing body <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> to annex such land to the <strong>City</strong>, as<br />

authorized by K.S.A. 12-520c, and subject to the condition that First Party shall not<br />

submit its resolution <strong>of</strong> intent to annex any or all <strong>of</strong> such tract <strong>of</strong> land to the Ellis County<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> County <strong>Commission</strong>ers unless and until the property becomes contiguous with<br />

the Corporate <strong>City</strong> Limits <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> on at least two sides.<br />

Upon the meeting <strong>of</strong> this condition and a decision by the Ellis County<br />

<strong>Commission</strong> which allows First Party to annex pursuant to K.S.A. 12-520c, First Party<br />

may so exercise its power to annex any or all <strong>of</strong> the above described tract.<br />

16


2. The parties intend for this petition for annexation to be binding upon any<br />

successors in interest to the above described area now owned by Second Party, The<br />

parties agree that First Party shall file this agreement with the Ellis County Register <strong>of</strong><br />

Deeds within thirty (30) days <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> this agreement, following the procedure set<br />

forth in K.S.A. 12-534. The parties understand that Second Party shall advise each and<br />

every purchaser <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the above described lot, in writing, <strong>of</strong> this petition for<br />

annexation and that it is binding upon all owners and successors in interest.<br />

3. Following execution <strong>of</strong> this agreement. Municipal services shall be<br />

provided with respect to the above-described lot as follows:<br />

SANITARY SEWER. Second Party shall connect one commercial structure on<br />

the above-described tract to the <strong>City</strong>’s sanitary sewer system in accordance with the<br />

<strong>City</strong>’s rules and regulations for the extension <strong>of</strong> such service to new customers. For any<br />

period <strong>of</strong> time such service is provided prior to the effective date <strong>of</strong> annexation, First<br />

Party shall provide sanitary sewer service at rates established for non-resident outside<br />

<strong>City</strong> limit customers.<br />

STREETS. Any streets constructed following annexation <strong>of</strong> the abovedescribed<br />

lot shall be constructed to those adopted street standards deemed applicable to<br />

such construction by the <strong>Hays</strong> <strong>City</strong> Engineer. The parties agree that the costs <strong>of</strong> such<br />

construction shall be assessed 100% to the above-described lot annexed by First Party,<br />

following creation <strong>of</strong> a benefit district formed in accordance with K.S.A. 12-6a01et seq.<br />

WATER. The parties agree that water will be provided to the above-described lot<br />

through a private well and that if at anytime the owner(s) <strong>of</strong> the above-described lot<br />

desire to connect to the First Party’s public water supply system for domestic use or for<br />

fire protection, the cost <strong>of</strong> such connections shall be paid by the property owners through<br />

direct payment or through the creation <strong>of</strong> a special benefit district.<br />

Second Party hereby petitions First Party for the formation <strong>of</strong> a special benefit<br />

district, as authorized by K.S.A. 12-6a01et seq., for the purpose <strong>of</strong> financing the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> public streets and/or installation <strong>of</strong> public water mains serving<br />

domestic/fire protection needs for the above-described lot. The parties understand that<br />

Second Party shall inform each and every purchaser, in writing <strong>of</strong> this petition for<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> a benefit district for street improvements and/or installation <strong>of</strong> public water<br />

mains, that by purchasing the above-described lot such purchaser has also petitioned for<br />

the creation <strong>of</strong> the benefit district, and that this petition is binding upon all owners and<br />

successors in interest.<br />

Any use <strong>of</strong> land and any improvements commenced after the execution <strong>of</strong> this<br />

agreement by Second Party or any successors in interest to any <strong>of</strong> the above described lot<br />

shall be in accordance with zoning regulations, subdivision regulations and building<br />

codes, building permit(s), building inspections, building and inspection fees now in force<br />

or as they may be amended in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>.<br />

17


The parties understand that upon annexation into the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, the use <strong>of</strong> and<br />

improvements to such lots shall be subject to First Party’s land use regulations and<br />

building codes in the same manner as with other newly annexed land.<br />

4. BREACH In the event Second Party breaches the terms <strong>of</strong> this agreement<br />

First Party may discontinue sanitary sewer service to the above described tract and shall<br />

recover from Second Party all necessary costs incurred as a result <strong>of</strong> such discontinuance<br />

<strong>of</strong> service, including but not limited to the cost <strong>of</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> lines, meters or other<br />

sewerworks.<br />

5. SEVERABILITY If any part or parts <strong>of</strong> this agreement are held to be<br />

invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional by any court, it shall be conclusively presumed that<br />

First Party and Second Party would have agreed to the remainder <strong>of</strong> this agreement<br />

without such invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional part or parts.<br />

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we hereunto set our hands this _____ day <strong>of</strong> ________,<br />

2012.<br />

CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS<br />

ATTEST:<br />

by_____________________<br />

_______________________ ________________________<br />

Brandon Weidenhaft, Owner<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

STATE OF KANSAS, COUNTY OF ELLIS, ss:<br />

________________________<br />

Julie Weidenhaft, Owner<br />

BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this____day <strong>of</strong> _________, 2012, before me, the<br />

undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, came the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas, by ________________________, its___________________________,<br />

who is personally known to me to be the same person who executed the foregoing Pre-<br />

Annexation Agreement and Provision for Sanitary Sewer Service, and duly<br />

acknowledged the execution <strong>of</strong> the same.<br />

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my<br />

notarial seal the day and last above written.<br />

____________________________________<br />

NOTARY PUBLIC<br />

My <strong>Commission</strong> Expires________________<br />

18


STATE OF KANSAS, COUNTY OF ELLIS, ss:<br />

BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this _____ day <strong>of</strong> _________, 2012, before me,<br />

the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, came<br />

Brandon Weidenhaft, who is personally known to me to be the same person who<br />

executed the foregoing Pre-Annexation Agreement and Provision for Sanitary Sewer<br />

Service, and duly acknowledged the execution <strong>of</strong> the same.<br />

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my<br />

notarial seal the day and year last above written.<br />

My <strong>Commission</strong> Expires________________<br />

STATE OF KANSAS, COUNTY OF ELLIS, ss:<br />

____________________________________<br />

NOTARY PUBLIC<br />

BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this _____ day <strong>of</strong> _________, 2012, before me,<br />

the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, came Julie<br />

Weidenhaft, who is personally known to me to be the same person who executed the<br />

foregoing Pre-Annexation Agreement and Provision for Sanitary Sewer Service, and duly<br />

acknowledged the execution <strong>of</strong> the same.<br />

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my<br />

notarial seal the day and year last above written.<br />

My <strong>Commission</strong> Expires________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

NOTARY PUBLIC<br />

19<br />

4


<strong>Memo</strong><br />

To: Toby Dougherty, <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

From: Bernie Kitten, Director <strong>of</strong> Utilities<br />

CC: I.D. Creech, Director <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Work</strong>s<br />

John Braun, Assistant Director <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Work</strong>s<br />

Jesse Rohr, PIE Superintendent<br />

Paul Briseno, Assistant <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

Kyle Sulzman, Assistant Utilities Director<br />

Jim Cooper, Utilities Superintendent Water<br />

Mark Darnall, Utilities Supervisor<br />

Tessa Scheck, Utilities Administrative Secretary<br />

Date: 9/21/2012<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong><br />

Utilities Department<br />

Re: Pre-Annexation <strong>of</strong> Property 2807 Hwy 183 Alt<br />

The owner <strong>of</strong> 2807 Hwy 183 Alt. has requested a sanitary sewer connection for a<br />

residential single-family dwelling. The <strong>City</strong> sewer main is available for connection.<br />

The owner has agreed to the terms <strong>of</strong> the standard pre-annexation agreement and the<br />

sewer rate for outside the city limits.<br />

The property owner will be responsible for the sewer line from the main tap to his<br />

buildings. The effluent must be residential sewage only.<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> Planning, Inspection and Enforcement Division will be inspecting the<br />

system tap<br />

Utilities Department, recommends approving the agreement allowing the property<br />

owner to connect to <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> sanitary sewer.<br />

20


To whom it may concern:<br />

8-23-12<br />

I will be opening Big Creek Veterinary Services, PA and would like to apply to connect<br />

to city sewer to better facilitate my business. Enclosed is the legal description for the<br />

property where it will be located. Thank you for your time and consideration.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Brandon Weidenhaft, DVM<br />

21


2807 183 Alt.<br />

22


<strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />

<strong>Memo</strong><br />

From: Jesse Rohr, PIE Superintendent<br />

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong>: October 4, 2012<br />

Subject: Vacate <strong>of</strong> Alley in Reservation Addition<br />

Person(s) Toby Dougherty, <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

Responsible: I.D. Creech, Director <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Work</strong>s<br />

Summary<br />

The Reservation Addition was platted in 1976. Within this plat, there is a platted alley<br />

dedication identified, however it was never improved in any manner. A request has been<br />

made by property owner Tom Alm (Discovery Drilling) to vacate a portion <strong>of</strong> a platted<br />

20 foot alley within the Reservation Addition located between lots 21 and 22 <strong>of</strong> Block 1.<br />

There are also no utilities within the 20’ alley dedication, and no future plan for utilities<br />

within the area. This request has been reviewed by city staff and has gone before the<br />

Utility Advisory Committee and the <strong>Hays</strong> Area Planning <strong>Commission</strong> for review and<br />

comment. All those involved have determined that the alley is not necessary, do not<br />

anticipate any future development requiring the alley, and do agree with the vacate<br />

request.<br />

Background<br />

The Reservation Addition was platted in 1976. Within this plat, there is a platted alley<br />

dedication identified, however it was never improved in any manner.<br />

Discussion<br />

A request has been made by property owner Tom Alm (Discovery Drilling) to vacate a<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> a platted 20 foot alley within the Reservation Addition located between lots 21<br />

and 22 <strong>of</strong> Block 1. The alley was dedicated during the platting process when the plat was<br />

approved in September <strong>of</strong> 1976. The alley was never improved and it actually only exists<br />

on paper. No physical or visible indications <strong>of</strong> the alley are present on site. There are<br />

also no utilities within the 20’ alley dedication, and no future plan for utilities within the<br />

area.<br />

The current property owner owns both adjacent lots (21 and 22) and is planning to<br />

expand his business yard onto the east property (lot 22) and has no need for the alley.<br />

Attached is a plat drawing showing the location <strong>of</strong> the alley to be vacated.<br />

23


Legal Consideration<br />

There are no known legal obstacles to proceeding as recommended by <strong>City</strong> Staff.<br />

Financial Consideration<br />

There are no known financial considerations for this request. The lot owner requesting<br />

the vacate will pay for any necessary recording <strong>of</strong> documents if the vacate is approved.<br />

Options<br />

Options include the following:<br />

� Approve the Ordinance vacating the platted alley<br />

� Do not approve the ordinance<br />

� Provide other alternatives<br />

Recommendation<br />

This request has been reviewed by city staff and has gone before the Utility Advisory<br />

Committee and the <strong>Hays</strong> Area Planning <strong>Commission</strong> for review and comment. All those<br />

involved have determined that the alley is not necessary, do not anticipate any future<br />

development requiring the alley, and do agree with the vacate request.<br />

Action Requested<br />

Approve the ordinance authorizing the vacate <strong>of</strong> the south 704.66’ portion <strong>of</strong> the 20’<br />

wide platted alley between lots 21 and 22, Block 1, <strong>of</strong> the Reservation Addition.<br />

Supporting Documentation<br />

Copy <strong>of</strong> Plat Map and Image<br />

Vacate Ordinance<br />

P:\<strong>Agenda</strong> Materials\2012\10-04-12\Reservation Addition Alley Vacate <strong>Memo</strong> 1.1.doc<br />

24


RESERVATION ADDITION<br />

ELLIS COUNTY, KANSAS<br />

25<br />

THIS l£J**C*tfCTIC« WtS tWOC BY BUCtffiP 4 WILLIS,<br />

C\3*lUi.T£!tG CNG1KEEXS, FLAXXEBi a AJtCHlTCCTS III<br />

N<br />

SCALE : I-JSO ,<br />

© • l^?* R£QAA SET AS SHOVlffv;<br />

notijiTCPHng»ai<br />

Stat* Cf tlWM, CoaMf Of ftafto,<br />

I, a Xetaiy mile la aad Ter 3*n» Coasvr, in U<br />

, do boraa*- e«"5try U«l Sawra M.<br />

l* NfcMi»ad to t*a foTafaii*; launawm. u rack « ._.„<br />

*pM»nd bafar* m iM» * p*613c f locat«» ecnatrjet ttd aalntala cr autharlk* tfea Xoe«tlant OQAstraoiiMt and<br />

naiManaoea *f polaa, vi«*ap, oun4ult«# aatar, f*#, aid ataar (daaa cr raqalrad dninw* etaanajs or<br />

awTtaraa apes t » aancad f cr <<br />

I aarabjr gT*i&*A.<br />

1 Vara, £*±a«* tbla<br />

^tata »r Kanaasr, CmuSt cf EiUa, aa<br />

m/£S&><br />

I, a V'-aiy ^Mte U and for »'Ui Coant?, In tha Stata af Easaaa. da fearaaysanity that<br />

Sail W. >o*M^ Ztwa 3. Dralllae fta&art I. 1-M^r<br />

prloraa *. LQtfcar . ana HayaClfariup»ar sSJSwr. toe.. 1Jmt.1>' SUA. Pr^ildairt.<br />

ra aooaerlaadio ih« firatrine lS^tricaaat *maisah« •FPoarad- * a<strong>of</strong>sm - i«-ettla day la paraoai<br />

aaal 1 ackaawlcdfad ackaowlcdfaa' t/ ta*t Usaj " rlcaad tbo fO*t aa tkalr can frao a»l aalaMarr<br />

haa^tr aat ferU-.<br />

r ban! end *>tarlnl !<br />

k Uetcaad prafcMiExaU<br />

cir or cats funrao c«itssrc« i^anrxunK:<br />

r wis ew^lata «n Xl? X» 1f76><br />

cur cr mis fluvdo ccMtotrcv, n,i.n cccrr. uicus<br />

irrori<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Eaeaaat daiatj cf tUia,<br />

Tbla la Up aarttfy ti»t Od.<br />

en Uhj /3 di<br />

1^-1 iff/ ' >»JV. 7-W<br />

Ahn v. smut, us.<br />

SUla Cetnttr CeanSaaleaarni<br />

, SatrKarr<br />

^»»ri»atia»t<br />

JOHN W. SMITH<br />

CONSULTING ENGINEER<br />

AND ASSOCIATES<br />

RCSERVATtON ADDITION<br />

C.LIS CC-JNTT-


Alley Vacate<br />

26


ORDINANCE NO. _______<br />

AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A PUBLIC<br />

PLATTED ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN LOTS 21 AND 22,<br />

BLOCK 1 OF RESERVATION ADDITION TO THE CITY OF<br />

HAYS, KANSAS.<br />

WHEREAS, the Governing Body <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas, finds it necessary and<br />

expedient that a portion <strong>of</strong> the platted alley located between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1, <strong>of</strong> Reservation<br />

Addition to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, described as follows, to wit:<br />

be vacated;<br />

The alley to be vacated is 20.00 feet wide and runs parallel with the line<br />

between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1, <strong>of</strong> the Reservation Addition to the <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas. The portion <strong>of</strong> the alley to be vacated is further described<br />

as follows:<br />

The South 704.66 feet <strong>of</strong> the 20.00 feet wide platted alley located parallel<br />

to and between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1, Reservation Addition to the <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas,<br />

WHEREAS, K.S.A. 12-504, authorizes the vacation <strong>of</strong> lands by the <strong>City</strong> Governing Body<br />

under certain conditions, which have now been met;<br />

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY<br />

OF HAYS, KANSAS:<br />

Section 1. That a portion <strong>of</strong> the platted alley located between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1, <strong>of</strong><br />

Reservation Addition to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, described as follows, to-wit:<br />

The alley to be vacated is 20.00 feet wide and runs parallel with the line<br />

between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1, <strong>of</strong> the Reservation Addition to the <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas. The portion <strong>of</strong> the alley to be vacated is further described<br />

as follows:<br />

The South 704.66 feet <strong>of</strong> the 20.00 feet wide platted alley located parallel<br />

to and between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1, Reservation Addition to the <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, Kansas, to be vacated, be and the same is hereby vacated.<br />

27


ORDINANCE NO.<br />

Page 2<br />

Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective upon publication in The <strong>Hays</strong> Daily News,<br />

the <strong>of</strong>ficial city newspaper.<br />

ATTEST:<br />

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11 th day <strong>of</strong> October, 2012.<br />

_____________________<br />

Doris Wing<br />

<strong>City</strong> Clerk<br />

28<br />

__________________<br />

Troy Hickman<br />

Mayor


<strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />

<strong>Memo</strong><br />

From: Paul Briseno, Assistant <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong>: October, 4 2012<br />

Subject: DHDC Pavilion Operating Costs<br />

Person(s) Toby Dougherty, <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

Responsible: Paul Briseno, Assistant <strong>City</strong> Manager<br />

Summary<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> requested an estimate <strong>of</strong> annual operating expenditures for the<br />

Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Development District proposed pavilion. Based on the design given,<br />

staff projected costs at $6,000. This item is brought forward to give greater insight into<br />

potential ongoing operational costs and respond to DHDC's funding/participation request.<br />

Staff asks the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> to give further guidance.<br />

Background<br />

At the September 20 th <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Session</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> asked staff to calculate annual<br />

operating costs for the Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Development Corporation proposed pavilion<br />

project. DHDC estimates the project to cost $576,534, which includes facility<br />

construction and site improvements. Specifically, their request from the <strong>City</strong> is not to<br />

exceed $276,534. Broken down, this request equates to a $100,000 cash contribution and<br />

$176,534 in match noncash (site improvements). DHDC will raise the remaining funds<br />

necessary for the project.<br />

The September 20th DHDC presentation outlining the project and costs are attached to<br />

this memo.<br />

Discussion<br />

Based on DHDC’s proposal staff has conservatively estimated the following reoccurring<br />

costs:<br />

Pavilion Project<br />

Annual Operational Costs<br />

$ 1,800 Electricity - Pavilion & Restroom<br />

$ 2,600 Cleaning 1.5 Hrs Per Occurrence<br />

$ 750 Cleaning Supplies<br />

$ 850 Mow, Fuel, Trimming, 20 weeks<br />

$ 6,000 Total Annual Operational Costs<br />

29


Staff would recommend $3,000 to $5,000 be placed in a replacement fund for future<br />

facility maintenance costs/depreciation.<br />

There is no calculation for additional advertising <strong>of</strong> the farmers market or potential event<br />

scheduling by <strong>City</strong> staff. The Parks Department envisions a similar process currently<br />

used to reserve shelters. It’s assumed a fee will be charged for utilization <strong>of</strong> this facility<br />

to recoup some costs. DHDC has committed ongoing marketing <strong>of</strong> the facility through<br />

its endeavors.<br />

Financial Consideration<br />

If approved the expected ongoing cost incurred by the Parks Department for operations<br />

would be $6,000, and the maintenance fund for future improvements would be $3,000 to<br />

$5,000. The requested total capital cost <strong>of</strong> $276,534 would be funded with <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong> Financial Policy Projects.<br />

Options<br />

1. Approve an amount not to exceed $276,534 to partially fund the construction <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Downtown Pavilion as presented by the DHDC to be paid out <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />

Financial Policy Projects.<br />

2. Direct Staff to gather additional information.<br />

3. Do nothing.<br />

Recomendation<br />

Staff recommends the <strong>City</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> give guidance for further participation <strong>of</strong> this<br />

project financially as well as the management <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

Action Requested<br />

Give guidance for further participation <strong>of</strong> this project financially as well as the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

Supporting Documentation<br />

September 20th DHDC Presentation<br />

30


DHDC Mission<br />

To foster awareness and promote<br />

Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> as a vibrant<br />

center <strong>of</strong> commerce, recreation,<br />

arts, government and history that<br />

serves the people <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong>, the<br />

surrounding region and visitors<br />

from around the world.<br />

DHDC will strive to prevent the<br />

deterioration and enhance the<br />

viability <strong>of</strong> the community’s<br />

cultural centers, historical<br />

landmarks and public<br />

infrastructure important to the<br />

community’s economic and<br />

cultural well being.<br />

DHDC Strategic Plan<br />

Strategic Goals<br />

1.Improve the physical appearance <strong>of</strong> Downtown<br />

<strong>Hays</strong> and the Chestnut Street District.<br />

2.Grow the number and variety <strong>of</strong> businesses in<br />

Downtown <strong>Hays</strong>.<br />

3.Develop and implement a branding/marketing plan<br />

to advertise and promote patronage <strong>of</strong> Downtown<br />

<strong>Hays</strong> and the Chestnut Street District.<br />

4.Support the quality <strong>of</strong> housing in the Downtown<br />

area.<br />

5.Develop new events and continue to support the<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> currently held successful events in<br />

Downtown.<br />

32


Future<br />

• Implementation <strong>of</strong> Downtown<br />

Pavilion Phases<br />

• Railroad Corridor<br />

Development to FHSU Plan<br />

• Development with the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Hays</strong> hike/bike trail<br />

• 2nd Phase – Way finding Signs<br />

• Banners for Downtown<br />

• Additional aesthetic street<br />

signs Downtown<br />

• Stronger Relationship with<br />

FHSU<br />

• New Website/Mobile Presence<br />

33


Multi-Use<br />

Pavilion<br />

• Multi-Use<br />

• Farmer’s Market<br />

• Family Reunions<br />

• Weddings<br />

• Outdoor Entertainment<br />

• Art Venue<br />

• Event Venue<br />

• University Events<br />

• Fundraising Event Site<br />

• Projected cost<br />

• Public/Private Investment<br />

Construction<br />

• <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> Management<br />

34


Proposed Location Site<br />

35


Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Multi‐Use Pavilion<br />

36


Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Multi‐Use Pavilion<br />

37


Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Multi‐Use Pavilion<br />

38


Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Multi‐Use Pavilion<br />

39


Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Multi‐Use Pavilion<br />

40


Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Multi‐Use Pavilion<br />

41


Downtown <strong>Hays</strong> Multi‐Use Pavilion<br />

42


ITEM TOTAL<br />

Projected Cost<br />

Site <strong>Work</strong> $ 35,000<br />

Site Demolition (remove foundation) <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> (Match Noncash) $ 176,534<br />

Stormwater Plan and BMP <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> (Cash Contribution) $ 100,000<br />

Landscape (from Jeff Boyle)<br />

Environmental Assessment<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> (Total Contribution) $ 276,534<br />

Infrastructure Improvements $ 125,760<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hays</strong> (Total Contribution) $ 276,534<br />

Water Improvements Donor (Cash Contribution) $ 300,000<br />

Sanitary Sewer Improvements<br />

UP Park Sidewalk Repair<br />

Electrical/Gas Service<br />

Restroom Facility<br />

Concrete Pavement around Pavilion<br />

Total Project Cost $ 576,534<br />

UPRR Permitting/Insurance $ 10,000<br />

Sub‐Total $ 170,760<br />

Contingency (15%) $ 25,614<br />

Other Sub‐Total<br />

$<br />

196,374<br />

Building 3,168 SF $120 $ 380,160<br />

TOTAL BUILDING AND OTHER SUB‐COST $ 576,534<br />

SALES TAX $<br />

‐<br />

TOTAL PROJECT COST<br />

43<br />

$<br />

576,534<br />

COST BREAKDOWN


Executive Director – Traci Konrade<br />

Pavilion Committee Chair – Michele Flax<br />

2700 Vine Street | <strong>Hays</strong> Kansas<br />

785.621.4171<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!