16.12.2012 Views

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

several industrial zones. Despite these efforts, the cost of pol- develop the industry resulted in policies that did not approlution<br />

control and prevention has yet to be integrated into priately price the economic value of tourism assets. The<br />

the concerns of industrialists, since monitoring is weak, there country learned from the mistakes of haphazard planning<br />

are no pollution taxes, and most industries regard pollution during the early years of development (1965-80), when the<br />

control as a burden that undermines profitability. The Government provided fiscal and financial advantages for<br />

Government has avoided imposing pollution taxes and the seaside developments built along coastal dunes that caused<br />

Unified Investment Code introduces incentives whereby a serious long-term erosion problems. After initially neglectfirm<br />

can receive up to 20 percent of the investment cost for ing adequate infrastructure (water and sanitation), during<br />

depollution activities. An antipollution fund (FODEP) gives the 1980s, the Government (under ONAS) developed a sysan<br />

additional subsidy for pollution abatement investment. tem for wastewater treatment for coastal areas superior to<br />

This approach does not follow the "polluter pays principle" that in many Mediterranean countries. Since the early<br />

used in many OECD and Eastern European countries, 1980s, environmental concerns have gradually become<br />

whereby the government raises funds from pollution taxes, more integrally linked with tourism development. The<br />

reducing the need for investment subsidies. Unified Investment Code (1994) makes further progress in<br />

Although the Government supports the concept of mak- correcting incentive distortions (see chapter 3, sections on<br />

ing the polluter pay, at this stage it is trying to promote com- domestic and foreign investment liberalization).' The new<br />

pliance through establishing industry norms of energy code removes preferential interest rates for tourism and<br />

efficiency and a broad-based prevention framework. These encourages hotels to introduce technologies that improve<br />

efforts combine regulations with incentives to use renewable energy efficiency. Tourist establishments must now pay the<br />

energies, natural gas and solar for final energy use, monitor- full cost of water, energy, and land, and pay a 0.5 percent tax<br />

ing and enforcement, and negotiated agreements between on tourist revenues to finance projects to clean up and<br />

specific enterprises to dean-up polluted areas and promote improve tourist towns and coastal areas.<br />

clean industrial growth. Even stronger efforts are needed to Despite these efforts, tourism development plans face<br />

make full use of the most cost-effective means of controlling environmental and social constraints to growth: (1) lack of<br />

pollution-cost recovery and pollution charges. water resources and insufficient sanitation infrastructure;<br />

The estimated cost of health problems in Tunisia (loss of (2) ecologically fragile areas; and (3) haphazard urban<br />

life, disability, and health care costs) caused by air pollution development, which frequently results from large-scale<br />

is US$595 million per year, and the estimated investment tourism development and the rapid migration of workers to<br />

requirement to provide drinking water, sanitation, industrial the area. To limit the mass tourism development that has<br />

pollution abatement, and natural resource management is degraded so many other coastal areas around the<br />

in the range of US$190-260 million per year over the next Mediterranean, the Government will need to reduce the<br />

ten years. By charging prices that fully recover the costs of physical size (number of beds) of its development plans,<br />

water and energy provision, the Government could gener- particularly in areas that are erosion-prone and pose probate<br />

an estimated additional US$484 million per year. lems in terms of water and sanitation. From the environ-<br />

Pollution charges would generate US$152 million per year, mental and social point of view, it is preferable to develop<br />

and the elimination of remaining subsidies in agriculture, fewer tourist sites that attract one visitor spending TD 120<br />

industry and tourism, another US$20 million. Even if these per day rather than three visitors spending TD 40 per day.<br />

recovery costs and pollution charges are introduced gradu- High value tourism (characterized by smaller and fewer sites<br />

ally, the potential revenue generated would help cover the and fewer people) places less stress on fragile areas, and it<br />

anticipated health and investment costs and would con- requires a more skilled work force that increases the valuetribute<br />

to the objective of lowering such costs in the future. added of the sector to the economy. To develop luxury<br />

tourism successfully, Tunisia may need to cooperate more<br />

Tourism and coastal zone management closely with foreign partners who have the know-how and<br />

expertise to design and construct luxury resorts, manage<br />

Tourism development has had a positive impact on height- them properly, and market them effectively among a more<br />

ening environmental concerns in Tunisia. But the desire to discriminating clientele.<br />

26 TUNISLi!S GLoBAL LNTEGRATION AND SusTAinABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC CHOICES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!