16.12.2012 Views

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 4<br />

Policies for higher growth<br />

As a result of the adjustment program and structural reforms the nonmanufacturing sector to GDP growth also rose<br />

initiated in 1986, the Tunisian growth performance improved (from -0.09 percent to 0.20 percent), whereas that of the<br />

considerably. This chapter analyzes such improvement. First, manufacturing sector slightly increased. The nonmanufacit<br />

describes the sectoral contribution to aggregate output turing sector increased its contribution to GDP growth<br />

growth. Then, after a brief exposition of the insights and evi- mainly because of the strong recovery in construction and<br />

dence provided by the new growth academic literature, it the slowdown of the decline in fuel.<br />

quantitatively examines how the enhanced growth perfor- Regarding the sectoral composition of GDP (table 4.2),<br />

mance is related to objective measures of various reforms. the respective average shares of the agricultural, manufac-<br />

The medium-term outlook section presents moderate and turing, and service sectors were higher during 1987-94 than<br />

high growth scenarios and the chapter concludes by propos- in 1983-86, whereas those of the mining, fuel, and coning<br />

a further liberalization of trade and the concentration of struction (particularly public works) sectors were lower in<br />

government's actions on the provision of public goods as necessary<br />

steps to achieve higher sustainable growth in Tunisia.<br />

the second period.<br />

TABLE 4.1<br />

Growth performance, 1987-94 Contribution to real GDP growth<br />

Tunisia's growth performance improved during 1987-94 Agriculture and flshing<br />

1983-86<br />

0.89<br />

1987-94<br />

0.68<br />

with respect to 1984-86. Real GDP grew at an average rate Agriculture 0.86 0.62<br />

of 4.52 percent in the latter period, compared to 2.63 per- Fishing 0.03 0.07<br />

cent corresponding to the previous three years (table 4.1). Industry excludingfuel 1.023 1.6<br />

This improvement was stronger in terms of per capita GDP Manufacturing 0.89 0.92<br />

growth due to a reduction in average population growth<br />

from 2.6 percent in 1984-86 to 2.1 percent in 1987-94. This<br />

Agmindustry<br />

Constructon materials<br />

Machinery<br />

0.15<br />

0.08<br />

0.21<br />

-0.02<br />

0.11<br />

0.11<br />

large difference is also due partly to the unusually poor performance<br />

during 1984-86 and to the sound macroeconomic<br />

Chemicals<br />

Textiles<br />

Other<br />

0.00<br />

0.28<br />

0.18<br />

0.16<br />

0.40<br />

0.14<br />

management and the program of structural reforms started Nonmanufacturing -0.09 0.20<br />

in 1986. The 1981-86 period is more representative of the Mining (excluding fuel)<br />

peno is more o ~~~~~~~~Fel<br />

prereform period. Gas and electricity<br />

0.01<br />

-0.22<br />

0.06<br />

-0.03<br />

-0.07<br />

0.07<br />

Except for agriculture and fishing, most sectors in the<br />

economy participated in this improvement (table 4. 1.) The<br />

Water<br />

Const-dion<br />

Total services<br />

0.05<br />

0.02<br />

1.35<br />

0.00<br />

0.23<br />

2.02<br />

agricultural sector, including fishing and agroindustry, Transport and communication 0.07 0.36<br />

decreased its contribution to GDP growth from an aver- FTnanal services 0.129 0.2<br />

age of 0.89 percent during 1984-86 to 0.68 percent for Commerce -0.10 0.19<br />

1987-94. On the other hand, the nonagricultural sectors<br />

increased their contribution to GDP growth from 1.67<br />

Other<br />

Government services<br />

Adjustment factr<br />

0.38<br />

0.59<br />

-0.16<br />

0.44<br />

0.59<br />

-0.10<br />

percent to 3.89 percent over the same period. Among the Net indirect taxes -0.40 0.88<br />

nonagricultural sectors, it was the service sector that expe- GDP at market price 2.63 4.52<br />

GDP at market price excluding<br />

rienced the highest rise in the contribution to GDP growth agriculture, agroindustry 1.67 3.89<br />

(from 1.35 percent to 2.02 percent). The contribution of So.rce: Data from Ministry of Economic Development and stf calculations.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!