16.12.2012 Views

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

costly process of adjustment, the average GDP growth rate of human capital (progress that in fact was initiated before<br />

for the whole 1987-94 period may understate the benefits the adjustment program of 1986), financial deepening,<br />

of reform. If this is the case, the average GDP growth rate abatement of price distortions, decrease of nonproductive<br />

during 1990-94 may better reflect the impact of the reform public expenditures, and higher openness to intemational<br />

measures. Table 4.4 presents the actual growth rates for the competition and trade, all contributed significantly to the<br />

reform periods 1987-94 and 1990-94, as well as that for the increase of the per capita GDP growth rate. Had the averprereform<br />

period 1981-86. age investment-to-GDP ratio remained the same in the sec-<br />

Most importantly, table 4.4 reports the contribution of ond period, the growth rate would have increased by 1.97<br />

the relevant proxy variables to the improvement in the per percentage points. This increase implies an improvement in<br />

capita GDP growth rate. The increase in the growth rate the efficiency of capital investment. However, the average<br />

predicted by the change in the proxy variables (1.19 per- ratio of gross domestic investment to GDP was 5.22 percentage<br />

points) is quite close to the actual increase (1.29 if centage points lower in the period 1987-94 than in<br />

the improvement is measured with respect to 1987-94, or 1981-86. According to the estimates presented in table 4.3,<br />

1.58 if with respect to 1990-94.) Advancement in the level this large fall may in principle cause a decline in the per<br />

capita GDP growth rate anywhere from 0.52 to 1.04 per-<br />

TAKLE 4.4 centage points. Given that in Tunisia most of the reduction<br />

Determinants of growth improvement in Tunisia in domestic investment was related to public enterprises<br />

Contribution to the with low productivity, a growth-rate reduction of 0.78 per-<br />

Variable<br />

Average<br />

1981-86<br />

Average<br />

1987-94<br />

improvement in the<br />

per capita GDP<br />

growth rate (percent),<br />

centage points (the midpoint estimate presented in table<br />

4.4) may overstate the adverse effect of the investment/GDP<br />

decline in the latter period. This partialy<br />

Investment/GDpb 29.30 24.08 -0.78metG Pdcieith laerpio.Tsprily<br />

pet2ent percent explains why the predicted growth-rate improvement in<br />

Secondary education'<br />

Govemment spending<br />

on education/GDP<br />

0.52 years<br />

5.56<br />

percent<br />

0.73 years<br />

5.84<br />

percent<br />

0.21<br />

0.06<br />

table 4.4 falls short of the actual improvement and represents<br />

for economic policy.<br />

targets<br />

Life expectancy at birth 63.61 years 66.36 years 0.34<br />

M2/GDP 43.86 48.57 0.14 Key macroeconomic indicators:<br />

Black market exchange<br />

percent<br />

10.60<br />

percent<br />

1.80 0.35 Medium-term outlook<br />

rate (premium over<br />

official rate)<br />

percent percent<br />

Table 4.5 presents medium-term projections for key macro-<br />

Government consumption<br />

(net of education<br />

spending)/GDP<br />

Average tariff rated<br />

10.87<br />

percent<br />

40.00<br />

10.49<br />

percent<br />

33.00<br />

0.05<br />

0.14<br />

economic indicators under two altemative scenarios,<br />

namely, moderate and hh growth. The two scenarios presume<br />

a continuation of both macroeconomic stability and<br />

Exports/GDP<br />

percent<br />

24.63<br />

percent<br />

36.00 0.68 structural reforms. The moderate-growth scenario reprepercent<br />

percent sents, to a large extent, an economy similar to that of the last<br />

Growth rate of per capita GDP' eight years. The high-growth scenario, on the other hand,<br />

1981-86<br />

1987-94<br />

1.15 percent<br />

2.44 percent<br />

assumes an acceleration of the pace of reform implementa-<br />

1990-94 2.73 percent tion and represents targets for economic policy.<br />

Acual growth Improvment<br />

In 1987-94 with respect to 1981-86 1.29 percentage points<br />

At the sectoral level, the main sources of growth under<br />

both scenarios are the manufacturing and service sectors.<br />

In 1990-94 with respect to 1981-86 1.58 percentage points In the high-growth scenario the manufacturing sector<br />

Predicted growth Improvement 1. 1 9 percentage points grows at an average of 8.5 percent per year. The service<br />

a. The estimated effects on growth gien as a range d vaiues in table 4.3 are used as the<br />

midpoint for this table's calations.<br />

sector, especialy financial services, transport, and<br />

b. Exduding the Gazoduc and Misbr projects. telecommunication will have to satisfy the demand stemc.<br />

The figures correspond to the years 1980 and 1985, respeciely.<br />

d. The fi as correspond to the years 1986 and 1993, respectively. ming from this higher level of economic activity<br />

e. Expo of nonpetroleum. nonphosphate products. more than 6 percent per year. In the moderate-growth scef<br />

Average growth rates are alcued using the laant-squan method<br />

e<br />

Source: Uold Bank calcuatiorn. nario, manufacturing value added grows in line with past<br />

growing<br />

48 TUNISIAS GLOBAL INTEGRATON AND SUSTAINABLE DEvELOPMENT STRATEGIC CHOICES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!