17.12.2012 Views

Art in its Time: Theories and Practices of Modern Aesthetics

Art in its Time: Theories and Practices of Modern Aesthetics

Art in its Time: Theories and Practices of Modern Aesthetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Buchloh sees the political limitations <strong>of</strong> Warhol’s personality as ultimately sett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

lim<strong>its</strong> to the “aesthetic <strong>and</strong> subversive ‘<strong>in</strong>tensity’” <strong>of</strong> his art. 55<br />

What Buchloh says about Warhol’s earliest work with art-cultural pretensions<br />

sets the pattern for his analysis <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> the 1960s as a whole: that<br />

the “task” Warhol set for himself was the destruction <strong>of</strong> the “metaphysical residue”<br />

that, cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g to pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, limited <strong>its</strong> utility as a “device” <strong>of</strong> negation. This<br />

55 Buchloh, “Andy Warhol l<strong>in</strong>e,” p. 64.<br />

THE PHILOSOPHY OF ANDY WARHOL<br />

Figure 9.2 James Rosenquist, Marilyn II, 1962, © James Rosenquist/VAGA, New<br />

York/DACS, London 2003. Image courtesy <strong>of</strong> The Museum <strong>of</strong> <strong>Modern</strong><br />

<strong>Art</strong>/Licensed by SCALA/<strong>Art</strong> Resource, NY.<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!