17.12.2012 Views

Art in its Time: Theories and Practices of Modern Aesthetics

Art in its Time: Theories and Practices of Modern Aesthetics

Art in its Time: Theories and Practices of Modern Aesthetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10<br />

THE AVANT-GARDE<br />

IN FASHION<br />

The March 1, 1951 issue <strong>of</strong> Vogue conta<strong>in</strong>ed four pages reproduc<strong>in</strong>g photographs<br />

made by Cecil Beaton <strong>in</strong> the Betty Parsons Gallery <strong>in</strong> New York, which<br />

have become well-known images among art historians <strong>and</strong> theorists deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

Abstract Expressionism (Figure 10.1). 1 They are part <strong>of</strong> a story called “American<br />

Fashion: The New S<strong>of</strong>t Look,” which follows a “Quick Tour <strong>of</strong> the Paris Collections.”<br />

The backdrops are pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs by Jackson Pollock, described <strong>in</strong> the<br />

accompany<strong>in</strong>g copy as “spirited <strong>and</strong> brilliant,” “dazzl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> curious” pictures<br />

that “almost always cause an <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>gs.” This aesthetic description is<br />

doubled by a social one: they are said to be admired by “some <strong>of</strong> the most astute<br />

private collectors <strong>and</strong> museum directors <strong>in</strong> the country.”<br />

It is easy to see why these images have come to haunt contemporary studies <strong>of</strong><br />

Pollock’s work: their elegant composition br<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>to juxtaposition a set <strong>of</strong> polar<br />

categories that have been used to talk about art throughout the modern period:<br />

avant-garde <strong>and</strong> fashion, abstraction <strong>and</strong> representation, autonomy <strong>and</strong> decoration,<br />

pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> photography, production <strong>and</strong> consumption, mascul<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>and</strong><br />

fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>ity, art <strong>and</strong> commerce. As we have seen <strong>in</strong> earlier chapters <strong>of</strong> this book,<br />

these pairs are not <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>of</strong> each other; as a group they structure the field<br />

<strong>of</strong> discourse concern<strong>in</strong>g the mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> modern art. Beaton’s pictures<br />

take us to particular versions <strong>of</strong> these issues activated <strong>in</strong> New York <strong>in</strong> 1951,<br />

but which are still alive today, half a century later.<br />

Thus T. J. Clark beg<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> ends his much-discussed essay on Jackson Pollock’s<br />

abstract pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, reworked for his book Farewell to an Idea, with Beaton’s<br />

pictures. The “idea” <strong>of</strong> Clark’s title is modernism, which he def<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the tradition<br />

<strong>of</strong> Theodor Adorno <strong>and</strong> the early Clement Greenberg as an aesthetic<br />

analogue to socialist politics. In Clark’s words:<br />

1 So far as I know, the first art-historical mention <strong>of</strong> Beaton’s pictures is <strong>in</strong> Phyllis Rosenzweig,<br />

The Fifties: Aspects <strong>of</strong> Pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> NewYork (Wash<strong>in</strong>gton: Hirshhorn Museum <strong>and</strong> Sculpture Garden,<br />

1980), p. 13. The historically best-<strong>in</strong>formed treatment rema<strong>in</strong>s Richard Mart<strong>in</strong>, “‘The New<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t Look’: Jackson Pollock, Cecil Beaton, <strong>and</strong> American fashion <strong>in</strong> 1951,” Dress 7 (1981),<br />

pp. 1–8.<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!