17.12.2012 Views

Untitled - Rebel Studies Library

Untitled - Rebel Studies Library

Untitled - Rebel Studies Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

98 PLANET OF SLUMS<br />

the colonial design of urban exclusion and social separation. Gooptu<br />

writes: "Implicitly or explicitly, the poor were denied a place in civic life<br />

and urban culture, and were seen as an impediment to progress and<br />

betterment of society."12<br />

Removing "Human Encumberments"<br />

Urban segregation is not a frozen status quo, but rather a ceaseless<br />

social war in which the state intervenes regularly in the name of<br />

"progress," "beautification," and even "social justice for the poor" to<br />

redraw spatial boundaries to the advantage of landowners, foreign<br />

investors, elite homeowners, and middle-class commuters. As in 1860s<br />

Paris under the fanatical reign of Baron Haussmann, urban redevelopment<br />

still strives to simultaneously maximize private profit and social<br />

control. The contemporary scale of population removal is immense:<br />

every year hundreds of thousands, sometimes milJions, of poor people<br />

- legal tenants as well as squatters - are forcibly evicted from Third<br />

World neighborhoods. The urban poor, as a result, are nomads, "transients<br />

in a perpetual state of relocation" (as planner Tunde Agbola<br />

characterizes their plight in his native Lagos),u And like the sans-culottes<br />

driven from their ancient quartiers by Haussmann - to whom Blanqui<br />

apostrophized a famous complaint - they "are weary of grandiose<br />

homicidal acts ... this vast shifting of stones by the hand of despotism."14<br />

They are also exasperated with the ancient language of<br />

modernization that defines them as "human encumberments" (to<br />

quote the Dakar authorities who cleared 90,000 residents from central<br />

bidonvzlles in the 1970s).15<br />

The most intense class conf1icts over urban space, of course, take<br />

place in downtowns and major urban nodes. In an exemplary study,<br />

Erhard Berner discusses the case of .Manila, where globalized property<br />

values collide with the desperate need of the poor to be near central<br />

sources of income.<br />

12 Gooptu, The Politics f the Urban Poorin Twentieth- Century India, p. 421.<br />

13 Tunde Agbola, Architecture if Fear, Ibadan 1997, p. 51.<br />

. . .<br />

14 Auguste Blanqui "Capital et travail" (1885), quoted in Walter BenJamm, The<br />

Arcades Pro/eel, Cambridge 2002, p. 144<br />

15 Richard Stren, "Urban Housing in Mrica," p. 38.<br />

HAUSSMANN IN THE TROPICS<br />

Metro Manila [is] one of the most densely populated areas in the world.<br />

The price of one square meter anywhere near the commercial centers far<br />

exceeds the annual income of any jeepney driver or security guard. Yet,<br />

the very nature of the income-generating possibilities requires one to<br />

stay close to where the action is, because distance from place of work<br />

means prohibitive costs in time and money .... The logical result is wide­<br />

spread squatting. Virtually all the gaps left open by city development are<br />

immediately filled with makeshift settlements that beat every record in<br />

population density.16<br />

Street vendors and other informal entrepreneurs also crowd Manila's<br />

central plazas, street corners, and parks. Berner describes the failure of<br />

market mechanisms or even private security to turn back this invasion<br />

of poor people who, after ail, are only behaving like rational economic<br />

actors - in the end, landowners are dependent upon state repression to<br />

keep squatters and vendors at bay, as well as to help evict residual populations<br />

of working-class renters and tenement-dwellers.<br />

Regardless of their political complexions and their different levels of<br />

tolerance for squatting and informal settlement on their peripheries,<br />

most Third World city governments are permanently locked in conflict<br />

with the poor in core areas. In some cities - Rio is a famous case - slum<br />

clearance has been going on for generations, but it gained irresistible<br />

momentum in the 1970s as land values exploded. Some metropolitan<br />

governments - Cairo, Mumbai, Delhi, and Mexico City, to name a few<br />

- built satellite cities to induce poor residents to relocate to the periphery,<br />

but in most cases the new towns simply sucked more population<br />

from the adjacent countryside (or, in the case of New Bombay, middleclass<br />

commuters) while the traditional urban poor clung desperately to<br />

neighborhoods closer to centrally located jobs and services. As a result,<br />

squatters and renters, sometimes even small landlords, are routinely<br />

evicted with little ceremony, compensation or right of appeal. In big<br />

Third World cities, the coercive Panoptican role of "Haussmann" is<br />

typically played by special-purpose development agencies; financed by<br />

offshore lenders like the World Bank and immune to local vetoes, their<br />

mandate is to clear, build, and defend islands of cyber-modernity<br />

amidst unmet urban needs and general underdevelopment.<br />

16 Berner, Dfending a Place, p. xv.<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!