07.11.2018 Views

MMC 52pp M10 WEB

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Offsite<br />

Offsite homes<br />

en masse for<br />

the masses<br />

It’s no secret that housebuilding needs to increase in the UK. It is currently estimated that a total of 250,000 homes need to be<br />

delivered each year in order to tackle spiralling house prices and the critical shortage of affordable homes. Year on year to date,<br />

this target has consistently been missed - with figures showing that only 184,000 homes were completed in England in 2016/17.<br />

Joe Bradbury of <strong>MMC</strong> Magazine discusses:<br />

Akey aspect to the problem is that<br />

developers in possession of large sites<br />

often only release a small amount of<br />

homes at a time, as slowing the pace of<br />

building affords them the opportunity to<br />

capitalise on the value of their assets. This<br />

results in local authorities looking to reclaim<br />

and manage the construction of new homes.<br />

Councils have largely been removed from<br />

housebuilding since the conservative<br />

government came into power in 1979, where<br />

private construction rose, but not by enough to<br />

compensate for the fall in public sector<br />

building.<br />

A cynic could be forgiven for posing the<br />

question “what have local authorities been<br />

doing all this time?” Council advisers argue in<br />

defence that they been exploring ways of<br />

getting back into housebuilding after decades<br />

of being removed. Both Labour and Liberal<br />

Democrats have historically argued in support<br />

of the state to once again commission and<br />

build new homes. Nevertheless, conservatives<br />

insist on austerity and warn that they need to<br />

be cautious about the state getting involved in<br />

housebuilding - stating that the country must<br />

live within its means in order to survive and<br />

thrive in a modern financial climate.<br />

It is clear that if the state reclaims house<br />

building then cost effective methods of building<br />

will have to be utilised.<br />

14 <strong>MMC</strong><br />

Nov 2018 <strong>M10</strong><br />

Offsite construction provides<br />

the solution<br />

Using offsite construction would allow the<br />

government to deliver houses faster and at a<br />

lower cost.<br />

It has been stated that a main factor holding up<br />

housebuilding in the short term, is a lack of<br />

materials. The surge in demand in late 2013<br />

and early 2014 led to a decrease in availability<br />

of traditional materials such as bricks. This<br />

paved the way for prefabricated materials like<br />

timber and steel to be used in housebuilding.<br />

Regardless of whether the state takes on<br />

housebuilding or if it is left to private house<br />

builders, the benefits of offsite construction<br />

are undoubtedly crucial to meeting targets<br />

which have to date been repeatedly missed.<br />

Offsite construction provides housebuilders<br />

with programme certainty and quality though<br />

simplification of site operations and reduced<br />

weather dependencies due to the controlled<br />

factory-based assembly process. Houses<br />

delivered through offsite construction offer<br />

enhanced specification standards and build<br />

quality which reduces occupancy costs related<br />

to energy use, defects and repairs. There is<br />

significant evidence that suggests that the use<br />

of offsite construction has been successful<br />

when applied to meet the needs of significant<br />

housing developments at scale with<br />

consequential opportunities for standardisation<br />

of design details - particularly to meet the<br />

need of government led programmes.<br />

Consider the environment<br />

‘The Waste and Resources Action Programme’<br />

posit that offsite construction practices<br />

generate up to 90% less waste than more<br />

traditional building methods. This is because a<br />

factory is a much more controlled environment<br />

than a traditional building site - throwing far<br />

fewer variables into the mix.<br />

Offsite and modular construction is much less<br />

energy intensive than traditional<br />

housebuilding. The carbon footprint left by the<br />

many construction vehicles and machinery on<br />

the site of a traditional construction project<br />

alone is considerably larger than that of<br />

modular construction. Fewer vehicles involved<br />

and less time spent on site results in fewer<br />

emissions and a vastly reduced carbon<br />

footprint as an industry.<br />

Offsite offers fast and affordable solution to a<br />

modern crisis, and with the UK Environment<br />

Agency and other government bodies putting<br />

increasing pressure on construction companies<br />

to reduce pollution and conform to<br />

environmental regulations, it may be a shift in<br />

practice that happens regardless of anybody’s<br />

stance on the subject. Ask yourself; are you<br />

ready for offsite?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!