22.11.2018 Views

Grey Power November 2018

The Grey Power Magazine is a prime national news source for its readers – New Zealand men and women over 50. Circulated quarterly to more than 68,000 members, Grey Power Magazine reports on the policies of the Grey Power Federation, and the concerns of the elderly, backgrounding and interpreting official decisions which affect their lives.

The Grey Power Magazine is a prime national news source for its readers – New Zealand men and women over 50. Circulated quarterly to more than 68,000 members, Grey Power Magazine reports on the policies of the Grey Power Federation, and the concerns of the elderly, backgrounding and interpreting official decisions which affect their lives.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28<br />

NZ GREYPOWER MAGAZINE » NOVEMBER <strong>2018</strong><br />

NATIONAL ADVISORY GROUP REPORTS - October <strong>2018</strong><br />

From page 27<br />

ing or Local Government, and liaise<br />

with the Taxation and Superannuation<br />

NAG on this.<br />

• Continue to work with associations<br />

on the use of the OPERAT assessment<br />

tool by members to provide<br />

evidence to support their and the<br />

Federation’s advocacy.<br />

Other activities<br />

At the request of the President, I liaised<br />

with NZ Land Search and Rescue<br />

concerning their Wander Search<br />

Programme. This programme is<br />

concerned with the potential of persons<br />

with cognitive impairment to go<br />

missing, and appropriate measures to<br />

both minimise risk and effect speedy<br />

location. <strong>Grey</strong> <strong>Power</strong> was invited to<br />

join a reference group to provide collective<br />

leadership and guidance.<br />

P. Matcham<br />

Group Chair<br />

RETIREMENT INCOME<br />

AND TAXATION REPORT:<br />

On this occasion the Report of the Retirement<br />

Income and Taxation Advisory<br />

Group will have more to do with<br />

the work of others, both within the<br />

membership of our board and external<br />

to the <strong>Grey</strong> <strong>Power</strong> organisation.<br />

Overseas Pension ‘abatement regime’.<br />

I refer to a remit adopted at the <strong>2018</strong><br />

Annual General Meeting and subsequently<br />

promoted passionately by<br />

at least one board member; recommending<br />

the Federation advocate for<br />

the removal from the Social Security<br />

Act 1938 (Section 70 etc.) of the impact<br />

of direct deduction provisions<br />

(DDP) on the spouse/partner of a<br />

recipient of New Zealand Superannuation<br />

who has additional overseas<br />

pension entitlements.<br />

I need to emphasize I am not referring<br />

to DDP per se. My recall of <strong>Grey</strong><br />

<strong>Power</strong>’s position on overseas pension<br />

abatements is that the measure<br />

is consistent with our concern that<br />

people who have resided and worked<br />

within the New Zealand economy for<br />

the duration of their working lives are<br />

not rendered inferior to other recipients<br />

who have accumulated overseas<br />

pension entitlements from a period of<br />

employment elsewhere than in New<br />

Zealand.<br />

The recommendation to our Board<br />

from our <strong>2018</strong> delegates was confined<br />

to support for the growing ‘lobby’ by<br />

organisations other than <strong>Grey</strong> <strong>Power</strong>,<br />

for an end to the ‘spousal’ provisions<br />

impacting on an otherwise fully dependent<br />

individual. To this limited<br />

degree I too am inclined to support<br />

their claim for relief.<br />

One of the more definitive reports<br />

on this topic is Auckland University’s,<br />

Retirement Policy and Research<br />

Centre (RPRC) paper “New Zealand<br />

Superannuation policy and Overseas<br />

State Pensions.”<br />

In the expectation that consideration<br />

of the relevant remit might well<br />

feature on the agenda of this month’s<br />

board meeting I have appended a copy<br />

of the RPRC paper; annotated with my<br />

comments in the sections I anticipate<br />

might be addressed in debate.<br />

Interim Report of the Tax Working<br />

Group:<br />

Apart from a general reference to the<br />

direction likely to be followed by the<br />

further work of the taxation review<br />

group, we are going to have to wait a<br />

little longer for the emergence of specific<br />

measures which might affect our<br />

membership.<br />

A useful commentary on the direction<br />

any restructuring might follow,<br />

is contained in the monthly economic<br />

bulletin of the Council of Trade<br />

Unions.<br />

The Executive Summary of this<br />

publication (complied by economist<br />

Bill Rosenberg, himself an appointed<br />

member of the review panel) is appended<br />

to this Report.<br />

Work in Progress (Advisory Group<br />

initiated)<br />

Lew Rohloff<br />

Group Chair (Off Board)<br />

SOCIAL SERVICES<br />

REPORT:<br />

Report on MSD consultation re Positive<br />

Ageing Strategy<br />

This second discussion was intended<br />

to cover the results of consultations<br />

around the country as well as the<br />

submissions received, but the latter<br />

(470) were so complex and numerous<br />

that not all had been analysed.<br />

The first session consisted of a presentation<br />

of the main themes presented<br />

by submitters so far and raised<br />

the following questions:<br />

• Typical patterns of expenditure in<br />

retirement?<br />

• End life care – what is it going to be?<br />

• Retirement or unemployment?<br />

• The philosophy of social investment<br />

– does this disadvantage older<br />

people?<br />

• Media approach to ageism – provision<br />

of media training packs<br />

around this attitude?<br />

• Government workshop – how often<br />

are they about ageism?<br />

• The second session was more<br />

about content and how it should be<br />

presented. Topics which came under<br />

discussion included:<br />

• The need for more population statistics<br />

around retirement, unemployment,<br />

structural ageing;<br />

• The death rate vs. population ageing;<br />

• A more interesting and challenging<br />

title for the document which might<br />

encourage people to read it;<br />

• The problematisation of ageing –<br />

terminology such as ‘silver tsunami’<br />

and the like;<br />

• Population itself does not age – it is<br />

the people within the population;<br />

• Ageing of the people a dividend to<br />

NZ, not a problem;<br />

• Accountability of responsible agencies<br />

in dealing with the situation;<br />

• Should the conclusions be placebased,<br />

finance-based or people-based?<br />

• The importance of funding – unless<br />

agencies commit to policy and<br />

receive specific resources, nothing<br />

will happen.<br />

K. de Lacy<br />

Group Chair<br />

Returns from 6.25% to 8% *<br />

DIVE INTO LIFE TODAY!<br />

Our unique investment model, with current returns<br />

of 6.25% - 8%* (paid out monthly), will give you the<br />

regular income you need to live life to the fullest. Take<br />

charge by choosing a mortgage investment that suits<br />

your financial strategy and is supported by a registered<br />

mortgage over the borrower’s property.<br />

If you’re looking for excellent returns** and a more flexible,<br />

transparent way to use your capital, talk to us today.<br />

Phone 0800 00 58 43<br />

www.southerncrosspartners.co.nz<br />

* Investment rate subject to change. Southern<br />

Cross Partners Ltd is a licenced Peer to Peer lender<br />

under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.<br />

** Based on our current rates and performance.<br />

To learn more about the risks associated with this<br />

type of investment, visit our website set out above.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!