17.12.2012 Views

Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics - Developers

Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics - Developers

Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics - Developers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dictionary <strong>of</strong> <strong>language</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>linguistics</strong> 50<br />

ambiguity<br />

In natural <strong>language</strong>s, property <strong>of</strong> expressions that can be interpreted in several ways, or,<br />

rather, that can be multiply specified in linguistic description from lexical, semantic,<br />

syntactic, <strong>and</strong> other aspects. In this sense, ambiguity is different from the complementary<br />

term vagueness as a designation for pragmatic ambiguousness or indeterminacy, which<br />

cannot be systematically described. Ambiguity can be resolved or represented (a) by the<br />

competent speaker, who can clarify the different readings with the help <strong>of</strong> paraphrases,<br />

(b) by grammatical analysis, for instance, within the framework <strong>of</strong> generative syntax<br />

models, which accord each possible interpretation <strong>of</strong> ambiguous surface structures<br />

different underlying structures ( disambiguation). Depending on whether ambiguity<br />

results from the use <strong>of</strong> specific lexemes or from the syntactic structure <strong>of</strong> complex<br />

expressions, a distinction is drawn between (a) lexical ambiguity (also polysemy,<br />

homonymy) <strong>and</strong> (b) syntactic ambiguity (also polysyntacticity, constructional<br />

homonymy). The representation <strong>and</strong> resolution <strong>of</strong> ambiguity by multiple interpretation is<br />

considered to be the most important criterion for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

grammars, especially as the occurrence <strong>of</strong> ambiguity plays a decisive part in numerous<br />

linguistic problems <strong>of</strong> description, as, for example, in quantifiers, negation,<br />

pronominalization ( personal pronoun), as well as in word formation. In everyday<br />

communication, ambiguity is a rather marginal problem, as context, intonation, situation,<br />

etc. usually sift out the adequate reading.<br />

References<br />

Gorfein, D.S. (ed.) 1989. Resolving semantic ambiguity. Berlin<br />

Kempson, R.M. 1977. Semantic theory. Cambridge. 123–138.<br />

Kooij, J. 1971. Ambiguity in natural <strong>language</strong>. Amsterdam.<br />

Su, S.P. 1994. Lexical ambiguity in poetry. London.<br />

Zwicky, A. <strong>and</strong> J.Saddock. 1975. Ambiguity tests <strong>and</strong> how to fail them. In J.Kimball (ed.) Syntax<br />

<strong>and</strong> semantics. vol. 4 New York. 1–36.<br />

Bibliography<br />

Fries, N. 1980. Ambiguität und Vagheit. Tübingen.<br />

ambisyllabic<br />

A segment occurring on the boundary <strong>of</strong> two syllables. e.g. [r] in Arab.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!