17.12.2012 Views

Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics - Developers

Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics - Developers

Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics - Developers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-Z 809<br />

non-monotonic reasoning non-monotonic<br />

logic<br />

non-strident strident vs non-strident<br />

non-terminative telic vs atelic<br />

non-verbal communication [Lat. verbum<br />

‘word’]<br />

All non-linguistic phenomena in inter-human communication processes which are studied<br />

in psychology (or psychiatry), sociology, ethnology, <strong>and</strong> <strong>linguistics</strong> (to the extent that<br />

spoken <strong>language</strong> can only be fully understood <strong>and</strong> described by considering nonlinguistic<br />

communication). Two distinctions are made in the signals <strong>of</strong> non-verbal<br />

communication: (a) vocal features such as the volume <strong>and</strong> pitch <strong>of</strong> the human voice, the<br />

rhythm <strong>of</strong> speech, laughing, coughing, etc., the study <strong>of</strong> which is collectively called<br />

para<strong>linguistics</strong> (occasionally, ‘para<strong>linguistics</strong>’ is used to refer to all types <strong>of</strong> non-verbal<br />

communication); (b) non-vocal (motor) phenomena such as mimicry, gestures, body<br />

<strong>language</strong>, eye contact, external appearance, <strong>and</strong> clothing, the study <strong>of</strong> which is also<br />

collectively known as kinesics. Structurally determined <strong>and</strong> freely variable components,<br />

which may overlie linguistic communication (such as intonation <strong>and</strong> speech tempo) or<br />

occur independently <strong>of</strong> it, are found together in both domains. Fundamental to the<br />

description <strong>of</strong> non-verbal communication is the question <strong>of</strong> the ‘character <strong>of</strong> the code,’<br />

that is, the systematic nature <strong>of</strong> non-verbal communication which suggests a distinction<br />

between intentionally directed non-verbal communication <strong>and</strong> unconscious, independent<br />

behavior having no communicative intention. In analogy to the structural characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> verbal codes, Trager (1958) <strong>and</strong> Birdwhistell (1954) interpret vocal, gesticulatory, <strong>and</strong><br />

mimic phenomena as communicative systems, while various functional approaches<br />

(above all those <strong>of</strong> Ekman <strong>and</strong> Friesen 1969 <strong>and</strong> Scherer (1978) try to describe the<br />

purpose <strong>and</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> non-verbal communication within the scope <strong>of</strong> all types <strong>of</strong><br />

communication <strong>and</strong> to describe their mutual conditions <strong>and</strong> dependencies. Scherer (1978)<br />

distinguishes between four ‘parasemantic’ functions <strong>of</strong> non-verbal communication: (a) in<br />

‘substitution,’ the non-verbal signal replaces the verbal semantic content, e.g. nodding<br />

one’s head in agreement instead <strong>of</strong> saying yes; (b) in ‘amplification,’ non-verbal<br />

communication serves to make the verbal expression clearer, e.g. directional gesture

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!