BusinessDay 07 Jan 2019
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Monday <strong>07</strong> <strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2019</strong><br />
comment<br />
Patrick Atuanya<br />
Atuanya is the editor of<br />
<strong>BusinessDay</strong>. Email: patrick.atuanya@businessday.ng<br />
Twitter: @patrick_atuanya<br />
It’s the start of the New Year,<br />
Nigerian stock are still falling,<br />
the feel good vibe around<br />
this time of the year is yet to<br />
ebb and yet I’m still thinking<br />
about the announcement made late<br />
last year about a merger between<br />
Access Bank and Diamond bank,<br />
with the potential to shake up Nigeria’s<br />
financial services sector.<br />
Whenever I think of the Nigerian<br />
Banking sector one thought always<br />
gets me excited.<br />
This is the pre provision operating<br />
profits levels for the industry.<br />
The thinking goes that if only the<br />
banks can clean up their books there<br />
could be potential upside for investors<br />
in financials.<br />
However there is always the fear<br />
of falling into a ‘value trap’, or by<br />
definition a stock that appears to be<br />
cheap because the stock has been<br />
trading at low valuation metrics such<br />
as earnings multiple, or book valuefor<br />
an extended time period. The trap<br />
springs when investors buy into the<br />
company at low prices and the stock<br />
continues to languish or drop further.<br />
The recent Access Bank – Diamond<br />
Bank merger has made the<br />
new entity to emerge to become the<br />
largest lender in Nigeria by assets and<br />
other metrics. With its huge bad loan<br />
portfolio which would need writing<br />
off, there is some similarity the new<br />
entity bears with FBN Holdings<br />
which used to be the largest bank<br />
by assets and is also dealing with<br />
bad loans for which impairment<br />
charges of N76.1 billion was taken<br />
C002D5556<br />
Investors should instead be asking<br />
themselves what kind of Nigerian banking/<br />
financial services sector will emerge from 2020<br />
(just 1 year from now), and who will be in the<br />
dominant position then to drive profitability<br />
BUSINESS DAY<br />
11<br />
comment is free<br />
Send 800word comments to comment@businessdayonline.com<br />
Unlocking value in the Access Bank - Diamond merger<br />
in Q3, 2018.<br />
Naturally the question for investors<br />
would be, is this new entity a<br />
buy?<br />
I decided to run some numbers<br />
comparing all three banks (FBNH,<br />
Access and Diamond), separately<br />
and then the combined Access and<br />
Diamond to see where they stood<br />
as at Q3.<br />
Basically plugging in the same<br />
valuation for FBNH for the combined<br />
Access and Diamond gives<br />
a share price of N11.38 and market<br />
value of N403.9 bn. Note that FBNH<br />
bad loan portfolio (NPLs at 14%) is<br />
probably much worse that what it<br />
would be for the combined Access/<br />
The table below tells the tale:<br />
Fig 1<br />
‘<br />
Diamond entity.<br />
Access Bank has signaled they<br />
would write off all bad loans in Diamond<br />
and no legacy NPLs will be<br />
coming into the new entity.<br />
Positives for the merged (Access/<br />
’<br />
Diamond) entity<br />
Low valuation<br />
If you believe that Nigerian banks<br />
or at least the largest banks should<br />
trade close to their book value then<br />
you could argue that N20 per share<br />
is closer to fair value for the combined<br />
name. Currently Zenith Bank<br />
(another bank which we believe<br />
will be closer to the new combined<br />
Access/Diamond) is trading at 0.92x<br />
book value.<br />
Scale<br />
Total assets of over N6trillion,<br />
and 29 million customers should<br />
give the new Access – Diamond<br />
entity enough levers to pull to drive<br />
profitability.<br />
Mobile money<br />
The coming mobile money,<br />
digital financial inclusion is an opportunity<br />
for the new bank given<br />
Access adoption of technology and<br />
the CBNs mandate to Telcos to<br />
partner with banks. Together, the<br />
two companies will have 29 million<br />
customers, including more than 13<br />
million mobile customers, as well as<br />
3,100 ATMs, 15.9 million cards and<br />
around 32,000 PoS terminals. Given<br />
how ambitious the Access Bank team<br />
driving the merger is, a MTN/Access<br />
Bank-Diamond Bank mobile money<br />
roll out would not be out of place<br />
and the impact on the bottom-line<br />
could be huge.<br />
Backward looking negative<br />
Sentiment<br />
Most of the negative sentiment<br />
that has followed this merger announcement<br />
is backwards looking<br />
and in our opinion misses the point<br />
completely. Investors should instead<br />
be asking themselves what kind of<br />
Nigerian banking/financial services<br />
sector will emerge from 2020 (just 1<br />
year from now), and who will be in<br />
the dominant position then to drive<br />
profitability. We think Access – Diamond<br />
will be a major winner in the<br />
evolving financial services landscape.<br />
Nominal growth/unbanked<br />
population<br />
The Banking sector (assets) has<br />
grown at circa 10% per annum on average<br />
since 2010 in Naira terms. This<br />
should provide steady lift to profits<br />
assuming more financially excluded<br />
are gradually being lifted into the<br />
formal space using digital financial<br />
services DFS.<br />
Profit levers<br />
Looking at the table above, the<br />
combined Access/Diamond has a<br />
lot of profit levers to pull including<br />
operating expenses of N130 billion<br />
and Personnel expenses of N58 billion.<br />
We expect these to come down<br />
with direct impact on topline.<br />
Experience from Intercontinental<br />
acquisition<br />
We think the Access Bank team<br />
has learnt a lot from the experience<br />
of swallowing Intercontinental Bank.<br />
One sign of this is reports that the<br />
Diamond Bank LOGO will survive the<br />
merger. This is a symbolic but effective<br />
way to keep a lot of the Diamond<br />
Bank customers from porting. Access<br />
Bank has absorbed six institutions<br />
in the past 15 years. According to<br />
management, the same team who led<br />
the past successful integration will be<br />
responsible for delivering the merger<br />
with Diamond Bank and overseeing<br />
the transition to the enlarged entity.<br />
Unknowns<br />
We believe that any unknowns<br />
from this deal (still awaiting more<br />
clarity) will be an upside surprise for<br />
Access Bank + Diamond Bank.<br />
Risks<br />
The major risk to our assumptions<br />
are execution and possibility<br />
of another recession in Nigeria.<br />
Also interest expense should<br />
increase in the near term as Access<br />
plans a $250m Tier 2 capital raising<br />
exercise.<br />
Send reactions to:<br />
comment@businessdayonline.com<br />
Dapo Oguntade<br />
I<br />
watched with keen interest<br />
the Vice Presidential candidates’<br />
debate organised ahead<br />
of the forthcoming elections<br />
in Nigeria. Obviously, the current<br />
government, to be candid, has not<br />
performed to the level of my initial<br />
expectations when it came into office.<br />
This is not to say they have done<br />
nothing worthy of commendation.<br />
At least, some of our rail lines<br />
are working again. There are many<br />
other initiatives such as the N-power<br />
and soft loan programmes as well as<br />
the conscientious efforts to develop<br />
other infrastructure projects to which<br />
the government deserves some<br />
credit. If anything, the level of waste<br />
and profligacy of the penultimate<br />
Vice presidential debate: Beyond the political rhetoric<br />
government has been curtailed to<br />
a great extent. However, as many<br />
would agree, the process of change<br />
is moving at snail pace and while<br />
the good intentions of current actors<br />
cannot be denied, the speed we<br />
are running at is way too slow for<br />
(i) where Nigeria currently stands<br />
and where we want to be (ii) the<br />
rate of expansion of our burgeoning<br />
population now forecast to exceed<br />
250 million by 2030 and (iii) the<br />
speed at which the rest of the world<br />
is moving at.<br />
I am not a particularly strong<br />
supporter of some of the government’s<br />
policies including those on<br />
infrastructure. I ask myself if the<br />
government can really bankroll<br />
the infrastructural needs of Nigeria<br />
by taking on various loans from<br />
international finance institutions.<br />
The Vice President, Professor Yemi<br />
Osinbajo recently estimated Nigeria<br />
needs about $1 trillion to modernise<br />
its energy infrastructure alone. The<br />
country is estimated to require $450<br />
trillion to execute on the National Integrated<br />
Infrastructure Master Plan<br />
(NIIMP). In my own estimations,<br />
there is only so much government<br />
can do and given the requirements,<br />
Nigeria needs to be moving with<br />
urgency. I am aware some measures<br />
have been taken to create certain<br />
structures through the Nigeria Infrastructure<br />
Fund and the resuscitation<br />
of the Infrastructure Bank. But these<br />
measures are just not enough. If we<br />
are looking to attract capital, we need<br />
to create the right legal framework<br />
and other measures necessary to<br />
guarantee attractive returns on investment.<br />
However what we truly need is<br />
a holistic infrastructure development<br />
strategy with creative policies as to<br />
limit our dependence on foreign capital<br />
to finance our infrastructure needs.<br />
This is a long term plan which cannot<br />
be done overnight.<br />
Our policies on agriculture and<br />
development of local industries are<br />
not robust enough. Our agricultural<br />
policies are at best disjointed and we<br />
lack the necessary support industries<br />
such as steel and petrochemical industries,<br />
to mention a few, which are<br />
the essential requirements to drive a<br />
modern industrialised economy. It is<br />
only when the essential industries are<br />
in place, then the resulting multiplier<br />
effects could lead to the creation of an<br />
even larger service driven economy.<br />
However, this is a matter for another<br />
day.<br />
There is a glaring absence, at this<br />
time, of any holistic, strategic and<br />
interconnected national development<br />
plan which accounts for all<br />
elements of monetary, fiscal, trade,<br />
foreign exchange, industrial, and<br />
capital formation and labour policies.<br />
Not to forget the legal, regulatory,<br />
constitutional and institutional<br />
framework necessary to achieve our<br />
aspirations. If those policies exist<br />
today in some form – maybe the<br />
national industrial revolution plan<br />
- then execution is lacking. There is<br />
need for joint concerted effort across<br />
all sectors, government levels and the<br />
private sector.<br />
Why was I so keen on the debate?<br />
I was interested in knowing if there<br />
is truly an alternative in this election<br />
cycle. While I am mindful that perfection<br />
might just be a pipe dream or a<br />
mirage, it is important to at least assess<br />
and critically analyse our options<br />
albeit from the limited scope of a time<br />
bound debate. Given my doubts on<br />
what difference Atiku Abubakar can<br />
make as the President, I was more<br />
interested in knowing what his running<br />
mate, Peter Obi, could offer.<br />
I could hear a lot of numbers and<br />
statistics coming forth during the time<br />
he presented. However, beyond the<br />
numbers, which should be expected<br />
ahead of such a debate. I felt the comments<br />
shared were light on details<br />
and short of any concrete plan in<br />
place to make a change. It sounded<br />
all too familiar – back to 2015 again<br />
– the numbers game. The arguments<br />
in my mind felt somewhat peripheral,<br />
on-the-surface and lacking depth.<br />
Further, I thought the comments<br />
on fuel subsidy was being in some<br />
ways economical with the truth and<br />
maybe playing to the gallery. It is true<br />
a more efficient system will provide<br />
additional savings but that distracts<br />
from the substance of the matter.<br />
Can Nigerians really bear a situation<br />
where subsidies are taken away?<br />
Let’s be factual, our refineries are at<br />
present not working.<br />
Note: the rest of this article continues<br />
in the online edition of Business Day<br />
@https://businessdayonline.com/<br />
Send reactions to:<br />
comment@businessdayonline.com