07.01.2019 Views

BusinessDay 07 Jan 2019

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Monday <strong>07</strong> <strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2019</strong><br />

comment<br />

Patrick Atuanya<br />

Atuanya is the editor of<br />

<strong>BusinessDay</strong>. Email: patrick.atuanya@businessday.ng<br />

Twitter: @patrick_atuanya<br />

It’s the start of the New Year,<br />

Nigerian stock are still falling,<br />

the feel good vibe around<br />

this time of the year is yet to<br />

ebb and yet I’m still thinking<br />

about the announcement made late<br />

last year about a merger between<br />

Access Bank and Diamond bank,<br />

with the potential to shake up Nigeria’s<br />

financial services sector.<br />

Whenever I think of the Nigerian<br />

Banking sector one thought always<br />

gets me excited.<br />

This is the pre provision operating<br />

profits levels for the industry.<br />

The thinking goes that if only the<br />

banks can clean up their books there<br />

could be potential upside for investors<br />

in financials.<br />

However there is always the fear<br />

of falling into a ‘value trap’, or by<br />

definition a stock that appears to be<br />

cheap because the stock has been<br />

trading at low valuation metrics such<br />

as earnings multiple, or book valuefor<br />

an extended time period. The trap<br />

springs when investors buy into the<br />

company at low prices and the stock<br />

continues to languish or drop further.<br />

The recent Access Bank – Diamond<br />

Bank merger has made the<br />

new entity to emerge to become the<br />

largest lender in Nigeria by assets and<br />

other metrics. With its huge bad loan<br />

portfolio which would need writing<br />

off, there is some similarity the new<br />

entity bears with FBN Holdings<br />

which used to be the largest bank<br />

by assets and is also dealing with<br />

bad loans for which impairment<br />

charges of N76.1 billion was taken<br />

C002D5556<br />

Investors should instead be asking<br />

themselves what kind of Nigerian banking/<br />

financial services sector will emerge from 2020<br />

(just 1 year from now), and who will be in the<br />

dominant position then to drive profitability<br />

BUSINESS DAY<br />

11<br />

comment is free<br />

Send 800word comments to comment@businessdayonline.com<br />

Unlocking value in the Access Bank - Diamond merger<br />

in Q3, 2018.<br />

Naturally the question for investors<br />

would be, is this new entity a<br />

buy?<br />

I decided to run some numbers<br />

comparing all three banks (FBNH,<br />

Access and Diamond), separately<br />

and then the combined Access and<br />

Diamond to see where they stood<br />

as at Q3.<br />

Basically plugging in the same<br />

valuation for FBNH for the combined<br />

Access and Diamond gives<br />

a share price of N11.38 and market<br />

value of N403.9 bn. Note that FBNH<br />

bad loan portfolio (NPLs at 14%) is<br />

probably much worse that what it<br />

would be for the combined Access/<br />

The table below tells the tale:<br />

Fig 1<br />

‘<br />

Diamond entity.<br />

Access Bank has signaled they<br />

would write off all bad loans in Diamond<br />

and no legacy NPLs will be<br />

coming into the new entity.<br />

Positives for the merged (Access/<br />

’<br />

Diamond) entity<br />

Low valuation<br />

If you believe that Nigerian banks<br />

or at least the largest banks should<br />

trade close to their book value then<br />

you could argue that N20 per share<br />

is closer to fair value for the combined<br />

name. Currently Zenith Bank<br />

(another bank which we believe<br />

will be closer to the new combined<br />

Access/Diamond) is trading at 0.92x<br />

book value.<br />

Scale<br />

Total assets of over N6trillion,<br />

and 29 million customers should<br />

give the new Access – Diamond<br />

entity enough levers to pull to drive<br />

profitability.<br />

Mobile money<br />

The coming mobile money,<br />

digital financial inclusion is an opportunity<br />

for the new bank given<br />

Access adoption of technology and<br />

the CBNs mandate to Telcos to<br />

partner with banks. Together, the<br />

two companies will have 29 million<br />

customers, including more than 13<br />

million mobile customers, as well as<br />

3,100 ATMs, 15.9 million cards and<br />

around 32,000 PoS terminals. Given<br />

how ambitious the Access Bank team<br />

driving the merger is, a MTN/Access<br />

Bank-Diamond Bank mobile money<br />

roll out would not be out of place<br />

and the impact on the bottom-line<br />

could be huge.<br />

Backward looking negative<br />

Sentiment<br />

Most of the negative sentiment<br />

that has followed this merger announcement<br />

is backwards looking<br />

and in our opinion misses the point<br />

completely. Investors should instead<br />

be asking themselves what kind of<br />

Nigerian banking/financial services<br />

sector will emerge from 2020 (just 1<br />

year from now), and who will be in<br />

the dominant position then to drive<br />

profitability. We think Access – Diamond<br />

will be a major winner in the<br />

evolving financial services landscape.<br />

Nominal growth/unbanked<br />

population<br />

The Banking sector (assets) has<br />

grown at circa 10% per annum on average<br />

since 2010 in Naira terms. This<br />

should provide steady lift to profits<br />

assuming more financially excluded<br />

are gradually being lifted into the<br />

formal space using digital financial<br />

services DFS.<br />

Profit levers<br />

Looking at the table above, the<br />

combined Access/Diamond has a<br />

lot of profit levers to pull including<br />

operating expenses of N130 billion<br />

and Personnel expenses of N58 billion.<br />

We expect these to come down<br />

with direct impact on topline.<br />

Experience from Intercontinental<br />

acquisition<br />

We think the Access Bank team<br />

has learnt a lot from the experience<br />

of swallowing Intercontinental Bank.<br />

One sign of this is reports that the<br />

Diamond Bank LOGO will survive the<br />

merger. This is a symbolic but effective<br />

way to keep a lot of the Diamond<br />

Bank customers from porting. Access<br />

Bank has absorbed six institutions<br />

in the past 15 years. According to<br />

management, the same team who led<br />

the past successful integration will be<br />

responsible for delivering the merger<br />

with Diamond Bank and overseeing<br />

the transition to the enlarged entity.<br />

Unknowns<br />

We believe that any unknowns<br />

from this deal (still awaiting more<br />

clarity) will be an upside surprise for<br />

Access Bank + Diamond Bank.<br />

Risks<br />

The major risk to our assumptions<br />

are execution and possibility<br />

of another recession in Nigeria.<br />

Also interest expense should<br />

increase in the near term as Access<br />

plans a $250m Tier 2 capital raising<br />

exercise.<br />

Send reactions to:<br />

comment@businessdayonline.com<br />

Dapo Oguntade<br />

I<br />

watched with keen interest<br />

the Vice Presidential candidates’<br />

debate organised ahead<br />

of the forthcoming elections<br />

in Nigeria. Obviously, the current<br />

government, to be candid, has not<br />

performed to the level of my initial<br />

expectations when it came into office.<br />

This is not to say they have done<br />

nothing worthy of commendation.<br />

At least, some of our rail lines<br />

are working again. There are many<br />

other initiatives such as the N-power<br />

and soft loan programmes as well as<br />

the conscientious efforts to develop<br />

other infrastructure projects to which<br />

the government deserves some<br />

credit. If anything, the level of waste<br />

and profligacy of the penultimate<br />

Vice presidential debate: Beyond the political rhetoric<br />

government has been curtailed to<br />

a great extent. However, as many<br />

would agree, the process of change<br />

is moving at snail pace and while<br />

the good intentions of current actors<br />

cannot be denied, the speed we<br />

are running at is way too slow for<br />

(i) where Nigeria currently stands<br />

and where we want to be (ii) the<br />

rate of expansion of our burgeoning<br />

population now forecast to exceed<br />

250 million by 2030 and (iii) the<br />

speed at which the rest of the world<br />

is moving at.<br />

I am not a particularly strong<br />

supporter of some of the government’s<br />

policies including those on<br />

infrastructure. I ask myself if the<br />

government can really bankroll<br />

the infrastructural needs of Nigeria<br />

by taking on various loans from<br />

international finance institutions.<br />

The Vice President, Professor Yemi<br />

Osinbajo recently estimated Nigeria<br />

needs about $1 trillion to modernise<br />

its energy infrastructure alone. The<br />

country is estimated to require $450<br />

trillion to execute on the National Integrated<br />

Infrastructure Master Plan<br />

(NIIMP). In my own estimations,<br />

there is only so much government<br />

can do and given the requirements,<br />

Nigeria needs to be moving with<br />

urgency. I am aware some measures<br />

have been taken to create certain<br />

structures through the Nigeria Infrastructure<br />

Fund and the resuscitation<br />

of the Infrastructure Bank. But these<br />

measures are just not enough. If we<br />

are looking to attract capital, we need<br />

to create the right legal framework<br />

and other measures necessary to<br />

guarantee attractive returns on investment.<br />

However what we truly need is<br />

a holistic infrastructure development<br />

strategy with creative policies as to<br />

limit our dependence on foreign capital<br />

to finance our infrastructure needs.<br />

This is a long term plan which cannot<br />

be done overnight.<br />

Our policies on agriculture and<br />

development of local industries are<br />

not robust enough. Our agricultural<br />

policies are at best disjointed and we<br />

lack the necessary support industries<br />

such as steel and petrochemical industries,<br />

to mention a few, which are<br />

the essential requirements to drive a<br />

modern industrialised economy. It is<br />

only when the essential industries are<br />

in place, then the resulting multiplier<br />

effects could lead to the creation of an<br />

even larger service driven economy.<br />

However, this is a matter for another<br />

day.<br />

There is a glaring absence, at this<br />

time, of any holistic, strategic and<br />

interconnected national development<br />

plan which accounts for all<br />

elements of monetary, fiscal, trade,<br />

foreign exchange, industrial, and<br />

capital formation and labour policies.<br />

Not to forget the legal, regulatory,<br />

constitutional and institutional<br />

framework necessary to achieve our<br />

aspirations. If those policies exist<br />

today in some form – maybe the<br />

national industrial revolution plan<br />

- then execution is lacking. There is<br />

need for joint concerted effort across<br />

all sectors, government levels and the<br />

private sector.<br />

Why was I so keen on the debate?<br />

I was interested in knowing if there<br />

is truly an alternative in this election<br />

cycle. While I am mindful that perfection<br />

might just be a pipe dream or a<br />

mirage, it is important to at least assess<br />

and critically analyse our options<br />

albeit from the limited scope of a time<br />

bound debate. Given my doubts on<br />

what difference Atiku Abubakar can<br />

make as the President, I was more<br />

interested in knowing what his running<br />

mate, Peter Obi, could offer.<br />

I could hear a lot of numbers and<br />

statistics coming forth during the time<br />

he presented. However, beyond the<br />

numbers, which should be expected<br />

ahead of such a debate. I felt the comments<br />

shared were light on details<br />

and short of any concrete plan in<br />

place to make a change. It sounded<br />

all too familiar – back to 2015 again<br />

– the numbers game. The arguments<br />

in my mind felt somewhat peripheral,<br />

on-the-surface and lacking depth.<br />

Further, I thought the comments<br />

on fuel subsidy was being in some<br />

ways economical with the truth and<br />

maybe playing to the gallery. It is true<br />

a more efficient system will provide<br />

additional savings but that distracts<br />

from the substance of the matter.<br />

Can Nigerians really bear a situation<br />

where subsidies are taken away?<br />

Let’s be factual, our refineries are at<br />

present not working.<br />

Note: the rest of this article continues<br />

in the online edition of Business Day<br />

@https://businessdayonline.com/<br />

Send reactions to:<br />

comment@businessdayonline.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!