31.03.2019 Views

Sheep magazine archive 1: issues 3-9

Lefty online magazine, issue 3: October 2015 to issue 9: April 2016

Lefty online magazine, issue 3: October 2015 to issue 9: April 2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

Among other things they pointed out: “The force<br />

cannot be seen as independent of the United<br />

States in any meaningful sense. It relies on<br />

the United States for the provision and regular<br />

servicing of the D5 missiles. While this country<br />

has, in theory, freedom of action over giving<br />

the order to fire, it is unthinkable that, because<br />

of the catastrophic consequences for guilty and<br />

innocent alike, these weapons would ever be<br />

launched, or seriously threatened, without the<br />

backing and support of the United States.” This<br />

shows how utterly pointless the “finger on the<br />

button” question is.<br />

And the generals went on: “Nuclear weapons<br />

have shown themselves to be completely<br />

useless as a deterrent to the threats and scale<br />

of violence we currently, or are likely, to face,<br />

particularly international terrorism; and the<br />

more you analyse them the more unusable<br />

they appear … Our independent deterrent has<br />

become virtually irrelevant except in the context<br />

of domestic politics.”<br />

The uselessness of Trident has been long<br />

understood. So clinging to it as a Labour party<br />

commitment is all about presentation and<br />

nothing to do with serious defence policy. Yet<br />

renewing Trident will cost £100billion.<br />

The shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, has<br />

admonished us all that we have to live within<br />

our means. So why spend billions on a cold war<br />

weapons system that is effectively useless?<br />

There are more general questions, too, raised<br />

by the response to Corbyn setting out his<br />

views on Trident. The first is: have colleagues<br />

really learned the lessons from the leadership<br />

campaign? One of those lessons is, surely, that<br />

people are tired of obfuscation and spin. They<br />

want politicians who believe in something and<br />

who set out those beliefs honestly.<br />

But there is also an issue about what constitutes<br />

leadership. Critics of Corbyn on Trident seem to<br />

think that leadership consists of a willingness to<br />

press a button and incinerate millions of people,<br />

or even to send thousands of British troops<br />

to risk their lives in wars of dubious legality. I<br />

suspect the public is weary of this kind of socalled<br />

leadership. Instead, Corbyn is trying<br />

to offer leadership on <strong>issues</strong> such as putting<br />

human rights at the top of our foreign policy<br />

agenda, even if it involves challenging allies like<br />

Saudi Arabia.<br />

In the world we face in 2015, that kind of<br />

leadership is both more relevant and much<br />

harder.<br />

Trident = suicide<br />

Artwork: KW Kaluta<br />

SHEEP IN THE ROAD : NUMBER 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!