31.03.2019 Views

Sheep magazine archive 1: issues 3-9

Lefty online magazine, issue 3: October 2015 to issue 9: April 2016

Lefty online magazine, issue 3: October 2015 to issue 9: April 2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24<br />

thing” and remains “something to be proud<br />

of”. Which might explain why – when some<br />

Royal Holloway University students recently<br />

posted a group-photo of themselves next to an<br />

on-campus statue of the “Empress of India”,<br />

with the question “How can we feel included<br />

when there’s a statue that celebrates the<br />

subordination of our people?” – they started an<br />

online storm.<br />

“I had some seriously nasty comments,” says<br />

Grace Almond, vice-president of the Royal<br />

Holloway Women of Colour Feminism Society.<br />

“People trying to defend Queen Victoria, saying<br />

that colonialism was the best thing to happen<br />

to India.” She finds the sheer hypocrisy of her<br />

attackers almost overwhelming. “People don’t<br />

seem to have a problem with the fact that British<br />

people were looting India and Nigeria and all<br />

sorts of other colonised countries and bringing<br />

it back over here. But, as soon as you suggest<br />

knocking down a statue of someone who is<br />

– in my opinion – one of the most evil men<br />

to ever walk the planet, people get extremely<br />

defensive.”<br />

One soft option is to simply update the<br />

monuments. In 2004, Italian artist Eleonora<br />

Aguiari famously covered the equestrian statue<br />

of another imperial figure – Lord Napier of<br />

Magdala, who sits at the gates to Kensington<br />

Gardens – entirely in red tape. “We have to<br />

discern between what’s good about our past<br />

and what is not – or no longer – good,” she<br />

says. “I believe in transformation more than<br />

destruction. It would be interesting to use<br />

these statues as a base for a new message, to<br />

transform them into something more in line with<br />

the new moment and society.”<br />

From a different perspective, Professor Mary<br />

Beard, the TV historian, author and Cambridge<br />

don, has consistently opposed the toppling of<br />

Rhodes. “Wanting to preserve his statue is not<br />

about saying that Rhodes was a good guy,” she<br />

claims. “ But I think people have to see...what<br />

we’re the beneficiaries of. I want to empower<br />

[students] to put two fingers up to that statue<br />

and say: ‘He was wrong.’ We’ve got to be able<br />

to look these figures from the past in the eye;<br />

otherwise we just push them underground, and<br />

that doesn’t solve the problem.”<br />

From across the quads, though, comes a<br />

dissenting voice. Actually, says Dr Priyamvada<br />

Gopal of Churchill College, Cambridge, tearing<br />

down statues is an “interesting idea”. She<br />

continues: “I would welcome any move that<br />

actually began the process of undoing imperial<br />

amnesia, a condition that afflicts large swathes<br />

of Britain, not least élite institutions.” Britain, she<br />

adds, needs to “look at itself in the mirror and<br />

finally undertake a reckoning with a history that<br />

is not beautified or sanitised”.<br />

For her, Rhodes Must Fall campaign was, and<br />

is, far more than a reductive debate about<br />

masonry. “As the campaign has demanded,”<br />

says Dr Gopal, “at a practical level, there needs<br />

to be a totally honest accounting-for of Britain’s<br />

imperial past, combined with a monumental<br />

effort to acknowledge how the legacy of that<br />

SHEEP IN THE ROAD : NUMBER 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!