12.06.2019 Views

Compendium Test

This is a test for the Compendium

This is a test for the Compendium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In terms of female representation<br />

and the representation of women of<br />

color, programmers outperform MSOs<br />

in each employee category examined.<br />

Moreover, the representation of women<br />

and women of color at management levels<br />

exceeds all four of the national benchmarks.<br />

That said, as discussed earlier in the report, CEOs<br />

at MSOs are more likely to demonstrate support<br />

for diversity initiatives than CEOs at programmers.<br />

The ILM map in Figure 17 shows the flow of<br />

talent in 2016 throughout the participating<br />

programming organizations. 17 Unlike the ILM<br />

map for the industry overall and the ILM map<br />

for MSOs, the largest career level for programmers<br />

is the Professional level (~41%) rather than<br />

the Staff level. The Staff level among programmers<br />

contains roughly 24% of employees and the<br />

Manager level contains about 31%. The remaining<br />

employees are at the Executive/Sr. Manager level<br />

(~5%). Moreover, unlike the overall ILM map and<br />

the MSO ILM map where upward movement out<br />

of the Staff level is very limited, for programmers,<br />

the promotion rate out of the Staff level into the<br />

Professional level is comparable to the promotion<br />

rates in more senior levels of the hierarchy.<br />

The ILM map in Figure 18 illustrates the flow of<br />

women and men for programmers in 2016. The<br />

representation of women among programmers<br />

is higher at the Manager level (46%) than at the<br />

Professional level (44%). Moreover, promotion<br />

rates for women at each level are comparable to or<br />

higher than those for men. Hire rates for women<br />

exceed hire rates for men at all levels. However,<br />

exit rates for women are higher than those of men<br />

across all levels. These findings for programmers<br />

are very similar to the findings in the 2015 PAR<br />

Initiative survey.<br />

Figure 19 shows that the ILM map for young<br />

professional programmers is similarly distributed<br />

when compared to the overall programmers<br />

ILM map, with the majority of the young professional<br />

workforce located at the professional level<br />

(~52%). Also similar to the overall programmers<br />

ILM map, the promotion rates for young professional<br />

programmers at all levels are generally<br />

comparable, with the promotion rate into the<br />

Executive/Sr. Manager level slightly higher than<br />

the promotion rate into other levels. Patterns of<br />

hiring and turnover among young professional<br />

programmers also mimic those observed in the<br />

overall programmers ILM map, with higher rates<br />

of hiring and turnover at lower levels.<br />

The ILM map in Figure 20 displays the flow of<br />

young professional women and men for programmers<br />

in 2016. The representation of young<br />

professional women is higher than that of young<br />

professional men at all career levels. Promotion<br />

rates also favor young professional women at all<br />

levels. For hiring, young professional men are hired<br />

at higher rates at the Executive/Sr. Manager and<br />

Manager levels, while young professional women<br />

are hired at higher rates at the Professional and<br />

Staff levels. Exit rates favor young professional<br />

women at the Executive/Sr. Manager level and<br />

favor young professional men at all other levels.<br />

17 The ILM map reflects 13 programmers that provided the information needed to create the map. The Blue Collar career<br />

level has been excluded.<br />

32 2017 WICT PAR INITIATIVE EXECUTIVE REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!