02.08.2019 Views

On Track Off Road No. 189

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MOTOGP<br />

BLOG<br />

ANYONE FOR 2021?<br />

More than Europe’s<br />

largest MC store<br />

It is nearly August, and we are halfway through the 2019<br />

season. With official confirmation that Danilo Petrucci has<br />

been given another year in the factory Ducati team and that<br />

Brad Binder is to step up to MotoGP in the Red Bull KTM<br />

Tech3 team for next year, just about all of the seats are settled<br />

for the 2020 season.<br />

Jack Miller is close to nailing<br />

down the details to stay on at<br />

Pramac for 2020, and after that,<br />

only the Avintia seats are up in<br />

the air for next year. The other 20<br />

riders will all have firm and settled<br />

contracts.<br />

With next year sorted for almost<br />

everyone, you might expect that<br />

the MotoGP paddock can go<br />

about its business calmly for the<br />

best part of a term, and not have<br />

to think about contracts for 2021<br />

until May or June next year. After<br />

all, it hardly makes sense to start<br />

considering 2021 when the 2019<br />

title hasn’t yet been decided,<br />

does it?<br />

Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that<br />

way. The paradox of having everyone<br />

locked into the same contract<br />

cycle means that the next<br />

cycle starts almost immediately<br />

after the current one ends. With<br />

all the factories and big teams<br />

committed to two-year deals for<br />

their riders it means that MotoGP<br />

negotiations are starting to resemble<br />

US presidential elections:<br />

a continuous process rolling on<br />

from phase to phase, rather than<br />

at fixed intervals.<br />

Why would a system that is<br />

meant to bring stability achieve<br />

the opposite effect? The issue is<br />

not so much contract length as<br />

contract timing. The idea of signing<br />

a rider for two years makes a<br />

lot of sense for teams and factories.<br />

If a rider is switching bikes<br />

or moving up from Moto2, they<br />

have a year to get their heads<br />

around the new bike or new class,<br />

work on their riding style, adapt<br />

to the bike’s idiosyncrasies. They<br />

may, like Fabio Quartararo this<br />

year or Johann Zarco in 2017,<br />

take to it like a duck to water, and<br />

start racking up results from the<br />

start. In that case, the team has<br />

an extra year to exploit the success<br />

of their rider, while the rider<br />

has a second season to make a<br />

full-throated attempt at the title.<br />

Two-year contracts are good when<br />

riders struggle too. Throughout<br />

2017, media and fan chatter<br />

centred on whether Jorge Lorenzo<br />

would get to serve the second<br />

year of his contract with Ducati.<br />

The Spaniard was being paid an<br />

awful lot of money by the Italian<br />

factory and had been hired to win<br />

the title. It took him until Mugello<br />

2018 before all the pieces fell into<br />

place, and he started to look like<br />

the Lorenzo of old.<br />

Lorenzo may need that second<br />

year of his contract with Honda<br />

as well.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!