27.08.2019 Views

book

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Oral Communications<br />

CO5<br />

Thursday, September 5th<br />

18:00<br />

DSGE Estimation using Generalized Empirical<br />

Likelihood and Generalized Minimum Contrast<br />

Gilberto Oliveira Boaretto<br />

PUC/Rio<br />

Márcio Laurini<br />

The objective of this work is to investigate the performance of moment-based estimators of<br />

the generalized empirical likelihood (GEL) and generalized minimum contrast (GMC) families in<br />

estimation of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models, with special attention to<br />

the robustness properties under misspecification. As benchmark we used generalized method of<br />

moments (GMM), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI).We work with a real<br />

business cycle (RBC) model considered the core of DSGE models and that has a smaller number<br />

of parameters, which facilitates a analysis of the estimators. From the Monte Carlo experiments<br />

we found that (i) empirical likelihood (EL) estimator - as well as its version with smoothed moment<br />

conditions (SEL) - and Bayesian inference (BI) obtained, in that order, the best performances,<br />

including misspecification cases; (ii) continuous updating empirical likelihood (CUE), minimum<br />

Hellinger distance (HD), exponential tilting (ET) estimators and their smoothed versions exhibit<br />

intermediate comparative performance; (iii) performance of exponentially tilted empirical likelihood<br />

(ETEL), exponential tilting Hellinger distance (ETHD) and its smoothed versions was seriously<br />

compromised by atypical estimates; (iv) smoothed and non-smoothed GEL/GMC estimators exhibit<br />

very similar performances; (v) GMM, especially in over-identified case, and ML estimators performed<br />

worse than their competitors.<br />

Keywords: Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models; Method of moments; Empirical<br />

likelihood; Minimum contrast; Robustness<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!