book
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Oral Communications<br />
CO5<br />
Thursday, September 5th<br />
18:00<br />
DSGE Estimation using Generalized Empirical<br />
Likelihood and Generalized Minimum Contrast<br />
Gilberto Oliveira Boaretto<br />
PUC/Rio<br />
Márcio Laurini<br />
The objective of this work is to investigate the performance of moment-based estimators of<br />
the generalized empirical likelihood (GEL) and generalized minimum contrast (GMC) families in<br />
estimation of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models, with special attention to<br />
the robustness properties under misspecification. As benchmark we used generalized method of<br />
moments (GMM), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI).We work with a real<br />
business cycle (RBC) model considered the core of DSGE models and that has a smaller number<br />
of parameters, which facilitates a analysis of the estimators. From the Monte Carlo experiments<br />
we found that (i) empirical likelihood (EL) estimator - as well as its version with smoothed moment<br />
conditions (SEL) - and Bayesian inference (BI) obtained, in that order, the best performances,<br />
including misspecification cases; (ii) continuous updating empirical likelihood (CUE), minimum<br />
Hellinger distance (HD), exponential tilting (ET) estimators and their smoothed versions exhibit<br />
intermediate comparative performance; (iii) performance of exponentially tilted empirical likelihood<br />
(ETEL), exponential tilting Hellinger distance (ETHD) and its smoothed versions was seriously<br />
compromised by atypical estimates; (iv) smoothed and non-smoothed GEL/GMC estimators exhibit<br />
very similar performances; (v) GMM, especially in over-identified case, and ML estimators performed<br />
worse than their competitors.<br />
Keywords: Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models; Method of moments; Empirical<br />
likelihood; Minimum contrast; Robustness<br />
42