DCN December Edition 2019
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Sixty days lead time is insufficient and is<br />
in fact a reduction to similar announcements<br />
DPWA made the previous year that offered<br />
a 90-day lead time. We received an example<br />
of the impact to a major WA exporter that<br />
these charges will cause significant losses<br />
on existing forward supply commitments<br />
and threaten the future viability of much<br />
of their business.<br />
“These fee increases equate to more<br />
than $1.50 per tonne on every container<br />
that we ship through DP World Fremantle<br />
from 1st January 2020. This fee has also<br />
been without consultation or sufficient<br />
pre-warning, extending the losses to our<br />
existing businesses caused by the abovementioned<br />
Low Sulphur Fuel Surcharge.”<br />
SUPPLY CHAIN IMPACT<br />
Furthermore, transport operators are<br />
understandably passing Infrastructure<br />
Surcharges/Terminal Access Charges<br />
down the supply chain, usually with an<br />
additional administrative fee causing a<br />
further cascading effect of costs onto<br />
exporters and importers. Again, this adds<br />
weight to our argument fees should be<br />
negotiated and paid via contracted parties<br />
and not imposed on transport operators.<br />
RE-BALANCING REVENUE RECOVERY<br />
DPWA provide a general rationale of<br />
increased Infrastructure Surcharges/<br />
Terminal Access Charges at each of their<br />
four container terminals that they are<br />
experiencing rising costs in the most<br />
dynamic and competitive market conditions<br />
in decades. DPWA claim a need to rebalance<br />
revenue recovery from waterside to landside<br />
to adequately account for landside costs and<br />
being fundamental to a sustainable future<br />
in this challenging market.<br />
If the stevedores are in fact<br />
“rebalancing” revenue recovery, then the<br />
obvious beneficiary are shipping lines who<br />
are paying them less. The latest ACCC<br />
Container Stevedoring Monitoring Report<br />
2018-19 shows revenue from quayside<br />
falling from $266.10 per lift in 2009/10 to<br />
just $190.40 per lift in 2018/19, almost a<br />
40% reduction. The report also says since<br />
the last reporting period (between 2017/18<br />
and 2018/19), the quayside revenue per lift<br />
has reduced by 8.1%.<br />
Remarkably, in a depressed economic<br />
environment, stevedores have still<br />
managed to increase average revenue per<br />
container lift for the first time in seven<br />
years. According to the ACCC report, this<br />
is attributable to the continuing cycle<br />
of increases in stevedore Infrastructure<br />
Surcharges. Something does not stack up<br />
as shipping lines are certainly not passing<br />
on savings to exporters and importers via<br />
lower terminal handling charges. The result<br />
being that exporters and importers are<br />
copping a double whammy of increasing<br />
charges without any offset or reduction<br />
in shipping line administered terminal<br />
handling charges.<br />
FINAL THOUGHTS<br />
While Infrastructure Surcharges/Terminal<br />
Access Charges provide stevedores with<br />
a healthy profit, they have significantly<br />
increased the commercial strain on<br />
logistics service providers who must carry<br />
the impost of the charges in the first<br />
instance and ultimately pass costs onto<br />
exporters and importers.<br />
Paul Zalai, director and co-founder of the Freight<br />
and Trade Alliance and secretariat to the<br />
Australian Peak Shippers Association<br />
According to the World Bank Group<br />
report Doing Business <strong>2019</strong>, Australia<br />
ranks 103rd for “trading across borders”<br />
which measures a variety of costs<br />
including domestic transport. These<br />
spiralling increases in unregulated fees<br />
administered by Australian stevedores<br />
will only further negatively impact on our<br />
international standing.<br />
While we continue to benefit from Free<br />
Trade Agreements, Mutual Recognition<br />
Arrangements and the like, our respective<br />
state and federal governments now need<br />
to look at market access barriers at our<br />
ports and introduce regulation to support<br />
our trade sector. More must be done to<br />
ensure a level-playing field for shippers and<br />
transport operators.<br />
INFRASTRUCTURE SURCHARGES - AS AT NOVEMBER <strong>2019</strong><br />
Image supplied<br />
STEVEDORE<br />
PORT<br />
INFRASTRUCTURE<br />
SURCHARGE/ TERMINAL<br />
ACCESS CHARGE<br />
DATE<br />
COMMENCED<br />
TERMINAL ACCESS CHARGE<br />
INCREASE COMMENCING<br />
1 JAN 2020<br />
Flinders Adelaide Container Terminal Adelaide $28.50 per full container + GST 1 Jul 18<br />
Australian Amalgamated Terminals Brisbane $38. 70 per full container + GST 8 Nov 18<br />
DP World Australia Brisbane $65.15 per container + GST 1 Jan 19 $89 per container + GST<br />
Hutchison Ports Brisbane $50 per full container + GST 19 Aug 19<br />
Patrick Brisbane $71.50 per laden container + GST 4 Mar 19<br />
DP World Australia Fremantle $8.22 per container + GST 18 Sep 17 $45 per container + GST<br />
Patrick Fremantle $7.50 per laden container + GST 12 Mar 18<br />
DP World Australia Melbourne $85.30 per container + GST 1 Jan 19 $98 per container + GST<br />
Patrick Melbourne $82.50 per laden container + GST 4 Mar 19<br />
Victoria International Container Terminal Melbourne $85.00 per full container + GST 1 Mar 19<br />
DP World Australia Sydney $63.80 per container + GST 1 Jan 19 $91 per container + GST<br />
Hutchison Ports Sydney $63.11 per full container + GST 18 Nov 19<br />
Data collated courtesy of the Australian Peak Shippers Association, Freight & Trade Alliance and the Container Transport Alliance Australia<br />
thedcn.com.au <strong>December</strong> <strong>2019</strong> 33