26.01.2021 Views

Zepke Stephen: Head in the Stars. Essays on Science Fiction

Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […]. But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction] Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta 260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm] Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia] ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5 — the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=

Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […].

But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction]

Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta
260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm]
Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia]
ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5


— the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The sun rises. 61 This first image of 2001: A Space Odyssey so

memorably accompanied by Richard Strauss’s Also Sprach

Zarathustra appears as a portent, as a vision of things to

come, and as an echo of these words of Nietzsche’s:

Zarathustra has become ripe, my hour has come!

‘This is my morning, my day begins: rise up now, rise up,

great noontide!’ (1961 336)

2001 is not just ‘about’ Nietzsche’s noontide, it is an

ambitious effort to project us into a new future by

overcoming the human, all too human. In doing so the

film extends science fiction cinema both technically

and philosophically, offering images of the future more

convincing than any seen before, but as well, the film

explores a new ontology of the future, its every epic surge

defining a new stage of transformation. From the ape’s who

beget us, humanity comes to itself before transforming

into something new – the overman. In this way Kubrick’s

1968 film echoes the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze’s

contemporaneous interpretation of Nietzsche’s eternal

return, one in which the future emerges as the repetition

of difference, the return of the new, overcoming the known

to take us beyond our humanity. 62 Deleuze is vital to

our appreciation of what 2001 achieves, because it is his

insistence on the importance of the future that allows us to

read the film philosophically – a philosophy that cannot, as

we shall see, be separated from its aesthetic merits. This is

to explore, for real, the possibilities of a cinema-thought,

one that attempts to enact a transformation worthy of its

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!