26.01.2021 Views

Zepke Stephen: Head in the Stars. Essays on Science Fiction

Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […]. But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction] Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta 260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm] Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia] ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5 — the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=

Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […].

But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction]

Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta
260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm]
Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia]
ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5


— the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

103 As opposed to assuming they must be repressed in order for the

social to function correctly, as hetero-normative society would have

it. See Delany, 1999a 188.

104 ‘by Natura naturans we must understand what is in itself and is conceived

through itself, [... and] by Natura naturata I understand whatever

follows from the necessity of God’s nature’ (EI, P29, Schol.).

105 Shit describes it somewhat differently, but no less dramatically on

his death bed: ‘when that boy turned around and stuck his dick up

my goddamn ass I thought the sky had opened up and the Congress

and the President of the United States had just declared Shit Haskell

was king of everything’ (792).

106 What better evidence for Spinoza’s parallelism? ‘The human mind

is capable of perceiving a great many things, and is the more capable,

the more its body can be disposed in a great many ways.’ (EII, P14) For

every affection experienced by the body there exists an idea in the

mind, an ‘idea’ rather than a ‘perception’ because perception implies

something caused by an object (EII, D3 + Exp.). As Eric thinks it;

‘something added to the sunlight rather than something that came

from it’. This takes us to; ‘The order and connection of ideas is the

same as the order and connection of things.’ (EII, P7) They are the same

substance only under the different attributes of thought and action

(EII, P7, Schol.).

107 Bull has a special function in the Dump, he delivers messages to

its occupants that actualise their till-then hidden desires. He is the

messenger of liberatory truth.

108 The published book only goes to section 113, as section 90 was

accidentally left out. The missing section can be found at http://sensitiveskinmagazine.com/chapter-90-through-the-valley-of-the-nestof-spiders/

109 ‘That thing is said to be finite in its own kind that can be limited

by another of the same nature. For example, a body is called finite

because we always conceive another that is greater. Thus a thought is

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!