26.01.2021 Views

Zepke Stephen: Head in the Stars. Essays on Science Fiction

Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […]. But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction] Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta 260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm] Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia] ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5 — the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=

Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […].

But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction]

Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta
260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm]
Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia]
ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5


— the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(ie., parasites) that can reconstitute open communities,

communities constituted around their immanent

heterogeneity and own becoming. We saw in the last

chapter how this is to once more orient science fiction

around a ‘real’ future, one capable of creating a new and

inhuman sensation.

The question now becomes what these aesthetic

attractors might be, and how could they work? Deleuze

and Guattari’s well-known call in Anti-Oedipus for an

acceleration of capitalism’s schizophrenia would be one

way of unleashing the material power of Pasquinelli’s

parasite. ‘Not to withdraw from the process,’ Deleuze

and Guattari write, ‘but to go further, to “accelerate the

process”, as Nietzsche put it: in this matter, the truth is

we havn’t seen anything yet.’ (1983 240) This will be an

approach explored by Accelerationism, and in particular

by the early work of Nick Land (see Avanessian, 2014 and

Land, 2012). Before Land explicitly adopted a far-right racist

ideology he explored an aesthetics in which capitalism

unleashes desire to gleefully turn against its captors, human

subjectivity and its organic body. Reading Bladerunner

and Terminator (Cameron, 1984) against themselves,

Land envisaged a ‘Cyberrrevolution’ (2012 319) in which

capitalism returns from the future in digital form to free

itself from human constraints: ‘How would it feel to be

smuggled back out of the future in order to subvert its

antecedent conditions? To be a cyberguerrilla, hidden in

human camouflage so advanced that even one’s software

was part of the disguise? Exactly like this?’ (Land, 2012

318) Here, the cyborgs are the heroes, cleansing the earth

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!