Zepke Stephen: Head in the Stars. Essays on Science Fiction
Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […]. But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction] Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta 260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm] Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia] ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5 — the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=
Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […].
But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction]
Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta
260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm]
Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia]
ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5
— the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The great achievement of the film is therefore the way
it turns realism and abstraction into the same thing, a real
hallucination. In this the film’s motto ‘long live the new
flesh’ affirms a powerfully inhuman and sublime force that
obliterates its conditions in order to conjure an entirely
new future. The videodrome’s inhuman flesh convulsed by
libidinal forces is not ‘outside’ Max, it is Max, but a Max
that has been abstracted from his humanity. This is the
sense in which the outside is immanent for Foucault and
Deleuze, the outside is matter abstracted from its meaning
and form, liberated to become something else. As Deleuze
describes it in his book Foucault; ‘The outside is not a
fixed limit but a moving matter animated by peristaltic
movements, folds and foldings that together make up an
inside: they are not something other than the outside, but
precisely the inside of the outside.’ (1988 97) Videodrome
is, as Foucault put it (without mentioning the film) ‘a
fiction that cancels itself out in the void where it undoes
its forms and appears with no conclusion and no image,
with no truth and no theatre, with no proof, no mask, no
affirmation, free of any centre, unfettered to any native soil;
a discourse that constitutes its own space as the outside
toward which, and outside of which, it speaks.’ (1998 153)
conclusion
Although Videodrome has some elements that are
dystopian, I’d like to call it instead a ‘utopian hallucination’
in the sense Deleuze and Guattari gives these terms in
What Is Philosophy? There, the power that Nietzsche
60