26.01.2021 Views

Zepke Stephen: Head in the Stars. Essays on Science Fiction

Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […]. But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction] Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta 260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm] Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia] ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5 — the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=

Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […].

But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction]

Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta
260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm]
Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia]
ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5


— the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

disappearing, but one which is not opposed to the genetic

element.’ (Deleuze, 1986 120) The any-space-whatever is

abstract, inasmuch as it eliminates both narrative and

character, producing what Deleuze calls ‘pure Powers and

Qualities’, creative potentials that open up new aesthetic

futures. The ‘any-space-whatever’ therefore exists, Deleuze

continues, ‘independently of the temporal order’, because it

appears ‘independently of the connections and orientations

which the vanished characters and situations gave to them’.

This appearance of ‘deconnection and emptiness’ (Deleuze,

1986 120) gives rise to what Deleuze will call ‘hallucination’. 15

I have already mentioned the stargate sequence, and

the ‘Regency room’ that follows it in 2001 as exemplary

examples of a hallucinatory abstraction in this sense, and

this is no surprise given Kubrick’s many references to

Nietzsche, most obviously in the famous theme music;

Also Sprach Zarathustra by Richard Strauss. Another

wonderfully ‘abstract’ film is Glen and Randa (McBride,

1971), a post-apocalyptic film that is neither mythic nor epic

in its narrative, and offers a compelling alternative to the

anti-counter-culture films from the early 1970s. Glen and

Randa instead affirms the hippy experience in the most

radical terms possible, as an absolute break with human

subjectivity that ushers in a ‘new age’ and new values. These

values are so new they seem almost impossible for us to

grasp, the film’s protagonists appearing as a teenage Adam

and Eve that are entirely beyond good and evil.

Their child-like innocence is bereft of any emotional

or moral commitments, and their aimless wanderings

appear without purpose. Indeed, the film’s post-apocalyptic

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!