Zepke Stephen: Head in the Stars. Essays on Science Fiction
Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […]. But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction] Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta 260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm] Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia] ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5 — the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=
Science fiction concerns the future, of course, this being its simple, organising essence. But science fiction wants to do more than just be in the future, it wants to predict the future, to reveal its horrors and beauty, its similarities and difference, and more importantly, tell us about all the cool stuff. This means that the ‘future’ science fiction explores has changed a lot over the years, and has a fascinating past, one with a twistier time-line than a Phillip K. Dick story […].
But this book is not a history of science fiction, because although historical context plays a part – the Cold War from which alien arrival films emerge, or our biopolitical present in which interface films become symptomatic – this book is most concerned with science fiction futures that crack history open, allowing something unaccountable to emerge, something singular and new. As a result, this book sees the ‘new’ and its ‘future’ in science fiction in a very different way from Darko Suvin and Frederic Jameson, whose astoundingly influential theory sees science fiction futures as forms of ‘cognitive estrangement’ that seek to reflect on the present that produces them. [from the Introduction]
Layout: Dejan Dragosavac Ruta
260 pages [Paperback : 13,5 x 19 cm]
Publisher: Multimedijalni institut [Zagreb, Croatia]
ISBN: 978-953-7372-67-5
— the book is available via Amazon: https://www.amazon.de/dp/9537372677/ref=olp_product_details?_encoding=UTF8&me=
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the infinite essence of God/Nature. 112 Common notions
are constantly occurring to Eric, even before he has read
Spinoza. As he sucks Jay’s cock in Turpens he has ‘a flash
of spring clarity, the afternoon sun a-slant beneath the
Atlantic highway – as Jay rubbed his head, the way the
hillbillies sometimes had. Eric thought: Damn…!’ (41-2)
Or when Eric tells Shit that holding his dick makes his
own feel bigger, and Shit says the same, remembering
that his Dad Dynamite used to tell him that too, when
they held each other’s (81). Or when Eric shoots his sperm
into a ‘medallion’ on his toilet wall, and then finds a stiff
‘irregular blotch’ in Dynamite and Shit’s bed that was ‘Their
medallion…?’ (126) Or as Jay tells us; ‘Boys and dogs, boys
and dogs – jerk ’em off, and they’ll be your friends for
life.’ That was always Dynamite’s philosophy.’ (344) From a
joyful affect comes an insight of commonality, of an essence
of pleasure defining the community that shares it, of a
common notion that includes Eric too, who thinks it.
Affective affinities lead to affirmative communities.
While Spinoza says that we love something that a person
we love loves (EIV, P22), in the language of Through the
Valley of the Nest of Spiders, ‘Shit claimed to love it [sex with
men when he was a child]. And because Eric loved Shit, he
loved whatever history had made Shit into Shit.’ (244) And
a little later the same logic applies to the love Dynamite
feels for Eric ‘Cause Shit loves you the way he do – and
that kind of love spreads around’ (293), or to Eric’s love of
Dynamite, which reminds Shit of his (437). It works the
other way too, as Barb explains to Eric regarding her lover
Ron (named after Ronald Reagan, also a conservative and
209