Continuity of Earth Observation Data for Australia: Research ... - csiro
Continuity of Earth Observation Data for Australia: Research ... - csiro
Continuity of Earth Observation Data for Australia: Research ... - csiro
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.3.3 Linkages to Operational Programs<br />
The CEODA-Ops Report (Geoscience <strong>Australia</strong>, 2011) listed 91 5 operational EO programs currently<br />
being undertaken in <strong>Australia</strong> (see Appendix B). These were referenced in the CEODA-R&D survey to<br />
demonstrate the linkages between current R&D projects and operational outcomes. Survey respondents<br />
were asked to select up to three <strong>of</strong> these operational programs that were related to their projects. During<br />
the survey process, ten additional programs were identified to produce a final list <strong>of</strong> 101 operational<br />
programs (see Appendix B <strong>for</strong> details) that are related to the surveyed R&D projects.<br />
Over 70% <strong>of</strong> the R&D projects surveyed cited one or more linkages to 60 <strong>of</strong> these current operational<br />
programs. Those programs supported by multiple research projects are listed in Table 2-9.<br />
It should be noted that AusCover TERN and the Centre <strong>for</strong> Weather and Climate <strong>Research</strong> (CAWCR)<br />
were included in both the CEODA-Ops list <strong>of</strong> operational programs and the CEODA-R&D survey. These<br />
projects are unique in that they involve the joint establishment <strong>of</strong> research infrastructure and EO data<br />
centres to support both research and operational activities. As such, the two surveys address different<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> their work.<br />
Those operational programs that are most supported by the surveyed R&D projects involve large area<br />
monitoring and/or modelling <strong>of</strong> environmental resources. In particular, EO-dependent programs that involve<br />
legislative monitoring, such as the National Carbon Accounting System (NCAS), have been developed from,<br />
and continue to be refined by, <strong>Australia</strong>n R&D projects. <strong>Australia</strong> is now a world leader in carbon accounting<br />
and shares this expertise with the global community through agreements such as the International Forest<br />
Carbon Initiative (IFCI) and co-leadership <strong>of</strong> the GEO Forest Carbon Tracking task and associated Global<br />
Forest <strong>Observation</strong> Initiative (GFOI).<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the methodologies being used in operational programs are also derived from R&D projects that<br />
are initiated without direct operational linkages. The Sentinel Hotspots program, <strong>for</strong> example, which was<br />
based on the adaptation <strong>of</strong> international fire detection systems (Dyce et al., 2004), was conceptualised by<br />
CSIRO and the Defence Imagery and Geospatial Organisation, and implemented in collaboration with GA.<br />
This <strong>Australia</strong>n expertise has also been used to help set up the multi-hazard Sentinel Asia program (Held<br />
and Kaku, 2007). Similarly, the successful Statewide Landcover and Tree Survey (SLATS) program initiated<br />
in Queensland is being adapted <strong>for</strong> use in NSW and Victoria. State agencies are generally focused on<br />
implementation, rather than development, <strong>of</strong> original methodologies <strong>for</strong> operational use, and rely on the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> R&D projects to direct their implementations.<br />
5 Program 26 was not included in this list due to insufficient EOS data usage.<br />
24 <strong>Continuity</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Observation</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>: R&D • January 2012