24.12.2012 Views

Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...

Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...

Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Session 6C: Breeding for Disease Resistance<br />

Breeding for Resistance to the <strong>Septoria</strong>/<strong>Stagonospora</strong><br />

Blights <strong>of</strong> Wheat<br />

M. van Ginkel <strong>and</strong> S. Rajaram<br />

Wheat Program, <strong>CIMMYT</strong>, El Batan, Mexico<br />

Abstract<br />

Genetic resistance remains the first line <strong>of</strong> defense against the septoria foliar blights, especially in developing countries.<br />

Resistance genes with major or minor effects may be either recessive or dominant. A few genes may be enough to confer<br />

resistance, as in the case <strong>of</strong> partial resistance. Additive gene effects contribute more to resistance than dominance effects.<br />

Among normally maturing semidwarf wheats possessing resistance, those carrying Rht2 may be more resistant to <strong>Septoria</strong><br />

tritici than those with Rht1. In the case <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum, resistance <strong>of</strong> the flag leaf <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the spike may be at least<br />

partly under separate genetic control.<br />

Five confounding factors complicate selection for resistance: 1) maturity <strong>and</strong> plant height affect the expression <strong>of</strong><br />

resistance; 2) the relationship between seedling <strong>and</strong> adult plant responses is highly inconsistent; 3) the correlation between<br />

disease response <strong>and</strong> yield loss is very variable; 4) there is interaction among fungal isolates on the leaf surface; <strong>and</strong> 5) it is<br />

essential to determine the implications <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> races for resistance breeding.<br />

Durability <strong>of</strong> resistance across years <strong>and</strong> locations is a particular concern, <strong>and</strong> examples <strong>of</strong> both erosion <strong>of</strong> resistance <strong>and</strong><br />

stable resistance have been put forward. There is clear pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> differential variety by isolate interactions at the seedling stage<br />

<strong>and</strong> on adult plants in the field. However, almost without exception, the size <strong>of</strong> the interaction component is about a<br />

magnitude smaller than that <strong>of</strong> the main effects due to varieties <strong>and</strong> isolates. Recent molecular experiments on the genetic<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> S. tritici populations have found a lack <strong>of</strong> adaptation to the host genotype.<br />

The methodology applied at <strong>CIMMYT</strong> for pyramiding resistance genes in wheat includes utilizing proven resistance<br />

sources as parents, selecting for resistance using a shuttle breeding program between contrasting locations, <strong>and</strong> confirming<br />

resistance through global multilocation testing. The best resulting lines are fed back into the crossing program as parents. The<br />

first genepool exploited for resistance to S. tritici by <strong>CIMMYT</strong> breeders originated in Brazil <strong>and</strong> Argentina, followed by<br />

winter wheats <strong>and</strong>, subsequently, Chinese materials. New sources <strong>of</strong> resistance, such as highly promising synthetic wheats,<br />

are currently being exploited in combination with the previous sources.<br />

Globally the septoria diseases<br />

have increased in importance over<br />

the past decades, <strong>and</strong> as Walter<br />

Spurgeon Beach wrote in 1919:<br />

“The genus is the more worthy <strong>of</strong><br />

study on account <strong>of</strong> its high<br />

economic importance.” The two<br />

main septoria blights addressed in<br />

this paper are caused by <strong>Septoria</strong><br />

tritici <strong>and</strong> <strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum.<br />

However, inferences can be drawn<br />

for the septoria blights in other<br />

cereals, such as <strong>Septoria</strong> passerinii on<br />

barley. Several excellent overviews<br />

have been written on the genetics <strong>of</strong><br />

resistance to the septoria diseases <strong>of</strong><br />

cereals <strong>and</strong> on how to breed for<br />

such resistance (Shipton et al., 1971;<br />

King et al., 1983; Nelson <strong>and</strong><br />

Marshall, 1990; Lucas et al., 1999;<br />

Eyal, 1999). Most <strong>of</strong> those reviews<br />

were published 10 years or more<br />

ago, but a great deal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

information they contain is still<br />

correct <strong>and</strong> relevant today.<br />

117<br />

This paper emphasizes some <strong>of</strong><br />

the more recent literature (post 1990)<br />

on the genetics <strong>and</strong> breeding <strong>of</strong><br />

resistance, <strong>and</strong> how these new<br />

insights may be applied in developing<br />

varieties that express durable<br />

resistance to the septoria blights.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!