Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...
Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...
Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
equires a predetermined set <strong>of</strong><br />
“differentiating cultivars,” which<br />
was not agreed to by <strong>Septoria</strong> tritici/<br />
<strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum workers,<br />
suitable methodology (sampling,<br />
culturing <strong>of</strong> pathogen, inoculum<br />
age <strong>and</strong> dosage, incubation<br />
categories, disease assessment,<br />
etc.), <strong>and</strong> controlled environmental<br />
conditions to ensure reliability <strong>of</strong><br />
results. The lack <strong>of</strong> a uniform<br />
methological approach <strong>and</strong>, in<br />
particular, <strong>of</strong> a common <strong>and</strong><br />
agreeable set <strong>of</strong> differentials<br />
introduces difficulties in comparing<br />
<strong>and</strong> drawing conclusions on a<br />
wider basis.<br />
The suggested speciation <strong>of</strong> M.<br />
graminicola on durum (Triticum<br />
durum) <strong>and</strong> common wheat (T.<br />
aestivum) may require the inclusion<br />
<strong>of</strong> differentiating cultivars <strong>of</strong> both<br />
species when they are grown<br />
together or in studies where both<br />
are tested (Kema et al., 1996;<br />
Saadaoui, 1987). Isolates from one<br />
species may not be pathogenic to<br />
the other Triticum species; still, they<br />
may show a significant interaction<br />
term when a proper set <strong>of</strong> cultivars<br />
<strong>of</strong> a species is being inoculated<br />
with isolates from the same species.<br />
Cross infection <strong>of</strong> the two species<br />
was reported for isolates secured<br />
from either Triticum species (Eyal,<br />
1999; Kema et al., 1996). The<br />
specific pathogenicity towards T.<br />
durum may have bearing on the<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> S. tritici populations<br />
(Saadaoui, 1987). Alternate<br />
cropping <strong>of</strong> bread wheat cultivars<br />
in a durum wheat management<br />
system may express a lower than<br />
expected infection level on the<br />
former than under uninterrupted<br />
bread wheat management.<br />
Today it is generally accepted<br />
that the specificity in virulence is<br />
low in S. nodorum, but can be<br />
The <strong>Septoria</strong>/<strong>Stagonospora</strong> Blotch <strong>Diseases</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wheat: Past, Present, <strong>and</strong> Future 179<br />
detected in S. tritici populations<br />
provided proper differentiating<br />
germplasm is used (Eyal, 1995).<br />
The magnitude <strong>of</strong> specificity in the<br />
S. tritici - wheat pathosystem <strong>and</strong><br />
its implications for breeding for<br />
disease resistance requires<br />
elaboration. Few dominant single<br />
genes conferring resistance were<br />
identified (e.g. Stb 1 - Bulgaria 88,<br />
Stb 2 - Veranopolis; Stb 4 - Tadinia)<br />
(Somasco et al., 1996). There are<br />
several reports that these resistant<br />
sources are not providing the<br />
claimed protection when moved<br />
across S. tritici populations with<br />
wide virulence patterns (Ballantyne<br />
<strong>and</strong> Thomson, 1995; Eyal, 1999).<br />
It is proposed that specificity<br />
<strong>and</strong> inheritance studies should be<br />
conducted with germplasm that is<br />
agronomically relevant to breeding,<br />
preferably exhibiting resistance to a<br />
wide virulence pattern (such as<br />
“Bobwhite“S”, IAS20-IASSUL, or<br />
other Frontana derivatives,<br />
Kavkaz/K4500 L.6.A.4, <strong>and</strong> other<br />
sources identified through<br />
multilocation testing) (Eyal et al.,<br />
1987). Special attention should be<br />
given to resistant wheat accessions<br />
developed in wide-cross programs.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> these accessions may be<br />
susceptible to other foliar diseases<br />
that may need attention when<br />
incorporating <strong>Septoria</strong>/<strong>Stagonospora</strong><br />
resistance. Germplasm used in<br />
virulence studies is usually derived<br />
from disease nurseries naturally or<br />
artificially infected with the<br />
pathogen <strong>of</strong> interest. Only in a few<br />
cases has the virulence spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />
these populations been categorized.<br />
It is therefore likely that<br />
identified resistant germplasm may<br />
have only limited use either as a<br />
breeding source or as<br />
“differentials.” Resistant<br />
germplasm that has withstood<br />
prolonged testing to variable<br />
pathogen populations can be<br />
considered a potential source for<br />
breeding for resistance. Special<br />
attention should be given to avoid<br />
selecting tall stature <strong>and</strong> late<br />
maturing germplasm that may<br />
introduce such non-genetic factors<br />
into germplasm evaluation, or<br />
germplasm with poor agronomic<br />
characteristics.<br />
Isolates possessing virulence to<br />
important resistance sources can<br />
become the “core virulence<br />
spectrum” for screening<br />
germplasm. There is no criterion as<br />
yet for selecting “relevant” isolates<br />
in artificially inoculated breeding<br />
trials. The criteria dictating the<br />
choice <strong>of</strong> isolates for genetic studies<br />
<strong>of</strong> virulence (Kema et al., 1999) may<br />
use considerations other than<br />
breeding. The choice by Kema et al.<br />
(1999) <strong>of</strong> S. tritici isolates such as<br />
IPO323 (avirulent on Veranopolis,<br />
Kavkaz, <strong>and</strong> Shafir) <strong>and</strong> IP094269,<br />
which is virulent on these cultivars,<br />
in studying the genetics <strong>of</strong><br />
avirulence in this pathogen merits<br />
adoption by other <strong>Septoria</strong> tritici /<br />
<strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum investigators.<br />
The correlation between<br />
seedling <strong>and</strong> adult host response<br />
has been substantiated by several<br />
investigators (Eyal, 1999; Kema <strong>and</strong><br />
van Silfhout, 1997). Screening for<br />
resistance at the seedling stage<br />
does not provide an integral view<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tested germplasm. Seedling<br />
tests can serve as a supplementary<br />
measure <strong>and</strong> are an excellent tool<br />
for detailed, controlled studies on a<br />
multitude <strong>of</strong> biological issues<br />
associated with host-pathogen<br />
interactions. The seedling test as a<br />
screening measure is hampered by<br />
not knowing whether the used<br />
isolates are relevant to the<br />
virulence spectrum <strong>of</strong> the