24.12.2012 Views

Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...

Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...

Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

equires a predetermined set <strong>of</strong><br />

“differentiating cultivars,” which<br />

was not agreed to by <strong>Septoria</strong> tritici/<br />

<strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum workers,<br />

suitable methodology (sampling,<br />

culturing <strong>of</strong> pathogen, inoculum<br />

age <strong>and</strong> dosage, incubation<br />

categories, disease assessment,<br />

etc.), <strong>and</strong> controlled environmental<br />

conditions to ensure reliability <strong>of</strong><br />

results. The lack <strong>of</strong> a uniform<br />

methological approach <strong>and</strong>, in<br />

particular, <strong>of</strong> a common <strong>and</strong><br />

agreeable set <strong>of</strong> differentials<br />

introduces difficulties in comparing<br />

<strong>and</strong> drawing conclusions on a<br />

wider basis.<br />

The suggested speciation <strong>of</strong> M.<br />

graminicola on durum (Triticum<br />

durum) <strong>and</strong> common wheat (T.<br />

aestivum) may require the inclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> differentiating cultivars <strong>of</strong> both<br />

species when they are grown<br />

together or in studies where both<br />

are tested (Kema et al., 1996;<br />

Saadaoui, 1987). Isolates from one<br />

species may not be pathogenic to<br />

the other Triticum species; still, they<br />

may show a significant interaction<br />

term when a proper set <strong>of</strong> cultivars<br />

<strong>of</strong> a species is being inoculated<br />

with isolates from the same species.<br />

Cross infection <strong>of</strong> the two species<br />

was reported for isolates secured<br />

from either Triticum species (Eyal,<br />

1999; Kema et al., 1996). The<br />

specific pathogenicity towards T.<br />

durum may have bearing on the<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> S. tritici populations<br />

(Saadaoui, 1987). Alternate<br />

cropping <strong>of</strong> bread wheat cultivars<br />

in a durum wheat management<br />

system may express a lower than<br />

expected infection level on the<br />

former than under uninterrupted<br />

bread wheat management.<br />

Today it is generally accepted<br />

that the specificity in virulence is<br />

low in S. nodorum, but can be<br />

The <strong>Septoria</strong>/<strong>Stagonospora</strong> Blotch <strong>Diseases</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wheat: Past, Present, <strong>and</strong> Future 179<br />

detected in S. tritici populations<br />

provided proper differentiating<br />

germplasm is used (Eyal, 1995).<br />

The magnitude <strong>of</strong> specificity in the<br />

S. tritici - wheat pathosystem <strong>and</strong><br />

its implications for breeding for<br />

disease resistance requires<br />

elaboration. Few dominant single<br />

genes conferring resistance were<br />

identified (e.g. Stb 1 - Bulgaria 88,<br />

Stb 2 - Veranopolis; Stb 4 - Tadinia)<br />

(Somasco et al., 1996). There are<br />

several reports that these resistant<br />

sources are not providing the<br />

claimed protection when moved<br />

across S. tritici populations with<br />

wide virulence patterns (Ballantyne<br />

<strong>and</strong> Thomson, 1995; Eyal, 1999).<br />

It is proposed that specificity<br />

<strong>and</strong> inheritance studies should be<br />

conducted with germplasm that is<br />

agronomically relevant to breeding,<br />

preferably exhibiting resistance to a<br />

wide virulence pattern (such as<br />

“Bobwhite“S”, IAS20-IASSUL, or<br />

other Frontana derivatives,<br />

Kavkaz/K4500 L.6.A.4, <strong>and</strong> other<br />

sources identified through<br />

multilocation testing) (Eyal et al.,<br />

1987). Special attention should be<br />

given to resistant wheat accessions<br />

developed in wide-cross programs.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> these accessions may be<br />

susceptible to other foliar diseases<br />

that may need attention when<br />

incorporating <strong>Septoria</strong>/<strong>Stagonospora</strong><br />

resistance. Germplasm used in<br />

virulence studies is usually derived<br />

from disease nurseries naturally or<br />

artificially infected with the<br />

pathogen <strong>of</strong> interest. Only in a few<br />

cases has the virulence spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

these populations been categorized.<br />

It is therefore likely that<br />

identified resistant germplasm may<br />

have only limited use either as a<br />

breeding source or as<br />

“differentials.” Resistant<br />

germplasm that has withstood<br />

prolonged testing to variable<br />

pathogen populations can be<br />

considered a potential source for<br />

breeding for resistance. Special<br />

attention should be given to avoid<br />

selecting tall stature <strong>and</strong> late<br />

maturing germplasm that may<br />

introduce such non-genetic factors<br />

into germplasm evaluation, or<br />

germplasm with poor agronomic<br />

characteristics.<br />

Isolates possessing virulence to<br />

important resistance sources can<br />

become the “core virulence<br />

spectrum” for screening<br />

germplasm. There is no criterion as<br />

yet for selecting “relevant” isolates<br />

in artificially inoculated breeding<br />

trials. The criteria dictating the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> isolates for genetic studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> virulence (Kema et al., 1999) may<br />

use considerations other than<br />

breeding. The choice by Kema et al.<br />

(1999) <strong>of</strong> S. tritici isolates such as<br />

IPO323 (avirulent on Veranopolis,<br />

Kavkaz, <strong>and</strong> Shafir) <strong>and</strong> IP094269,<br />

which is virulent on these cultivars,<br />

in studying the genetics <strong>of</strong><br />

avirulence in this pathogen merits<br />

adoption by other <strong>Septoria</strong> tritici /<br />

<strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum investigators.<br />

The correlation between<br />

seedling <strong>and</strong> adult host response<br />

has been substantiated by several<br />

investigators (Eyal, 1999; Kema <strong>and</strong><br />

van Silfhout, 1997). Screening for<br />

resistance at the seedling stage<br />

does not provide an integral view<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tested germplasm. Seedling<br />

tests can serve as a supplementary<br />

measure <strong>and</strong> are an excellent tool<br />

for detailed, controlled studies on a<br />

multitude <strong>of</strong> biological issues<br />

associated with host-pathogen<br />

interactions. The seedling test as a<br />

screening measure is hampered by<br />

not knowing whether the used<br />

isolates are relevant to the<br />

virulence spectrum <strong>of</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!