25.12.2012 Views

The emergence of attraction errors during sentence comprehension

The emergence of attraction errors during sentence comprehension

The emergence of attraction errors during sentence comprehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.1. GRAMMATICAL NUMBER 17<br />

in the world, a plural noun phrase refers to multiple entities. Richer number systems<br />

provide a more fine-grained division. But grammatical and notional number<br />

do not always go hand in hand. Things that are perceptually conceived as<br />

a singleton can be lexicalized as plural forms (e.g., scissors, trousers). At the<br />

same time, singular forms can refer to collections <strong>of</strong> entities sharing one property<br />

(e.g., orchestra). Mass nouns like water are another noun class for which notional<br />

number and grammatical number diverge. Since these cases received considerable<br />

attention in the discussion <strong>of</strong> agreement both in the theoretical literature and the<br />

psycholinguistic literature, they will be considered in some more detail below.<br />

Summation Plurals<br />

So-called SUMMATION PLURALS are nouns which are formally plural words but<br />

denote singleton objects. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>of</strong>ten refer to entities with symmetrical parts,<br />

mainly tools and instruments (e.g., scissors, pliers, binoculars, glasses) and clothes<br />

(e.g., trousers, pants, pajamas). Thus, there might be a transparent relation between<br />

the formal plurality and some kind <strong>of</strong> conceptual plurality. One could argue<br />

that these nouns refer to the two parts which form the object—the two cutting<br />

edges <strong>of</strong> a pair <strong>of</strong> scissors or the two trouser legs in the case <strong>of</strong> trousers. And<br />

indeed, historically this seems to be true, at least for some nouns in this class.<br />

An example is the German equivalent <strong>of</strong> trousers: Hose originally denoted a single<br />

piece <strong>of</strong> a pair <strong>of</strong> chausses which were put on in addition to some kind <strong>of</strong><br />

short pants. Later on both clothes were unified to what German speakers call now<br />

Hose (Kluge, 1999). <strong>The</strong> plural usage survived in some idioms as shown in the<br />

examples below. 5<br />

(4) a. die Spendierhosen anhaben<br />

the donating-trousers wear<br />

‘to be in a generous mood’<br />

b. die Hosen anhaben<br />

the trousers wear<br />

‘to be in charge’ (equivalent to ‘to wear the trousers/breeches’)<br />

c. die Hosen voll haben<br />

the trousers full have<br />

‘to be scared’ (equivalent to ‘to be in a blue funk’)<br />

d. Das<br />

the<br />

Herz rutschte ihm in die Hose(n)<br />

heart fell him into the trousers<br />

‘He lost his courage’ (equivalent to ‘his heart sank into his boots’)<br />

5 Some people consider the plural form in (4d) to be old-fashioned.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!